Re: [R] complex contrasts and logistic regression

2007-06-25 Thread Nicholas Lewin-Koh
Hi,
Sorry to take so long to reply, I was travelling last week. Thanks for
your
suggestions. Actually in this case contrast and predict gave the same
result,
and what I was looking at was the correct odds from the model. 

What is still confusing me is the 1st part of my question,
looking for a trend in odds ratios. From what I understand
testing the interaction:
fit1-glmD(survived ~ as.numeric(Covariate)+Therapy +
confounder,myDat,X=TRUE, Y=TRUE, family=binomial())
fit2-glmD(survived ~ as.numeric(Covariate)*Therapy +
confounder,myDat,X=TRUE, Y=TRUE, family=binomial()) 
lrtest(fit1,fit2)

Would be effectively testing for a trend in odds ratios? 
Do I have to fiddle with contrasts to make sure I am testing the correct
parameter?

Thanks
Nicholas

On Sat, 16 Jun 2007 11:14:12 -0500, Frank E Harrell Jr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
 Nicholas Lewin-Koh wrote:
  Hi,
  I am doing a retrospective analysis on a cohort from a designed trial,
  and I am fitting
  the model
  
  fit-glmD(survived ~ Covariate*Therapy + confounder,myDat,X=TRUE,
  Y=TRUE, family=binomial()) 
 
 For logistic regression you can also use Design's lrm function which 
 gives you more options.
 
  
  My covariate has three levels (A,B and C) and therapy has two
  (treated and control), confounder is a continuous variable.
  Also patients were randomized to treatment in the trial, but Covariate
  is something that is measured
  posthoc and can vary in the population.
 
 If by posthoc you mean that the covariate is measured after baseline, it 
 is difficult to get an interpretable analysis.
 
   
  I am trying to wrap my head around how to calculate a few quantities
  from the model
  and get reasonable confidence intervals for them, namely I would like to
  test
  
  H0: gamma=0, where gamma is the regression coefficient of the odds
  ratios of surviving
   under treatment vs control at each level of Covariate
   (adjusted for the confounder)
 
 You mean regression coefficient on the log odds ratio scale.  This is 
 easy to do with the contrast( ) function in Design.  Do ?contrast.Design 
 for details and examples.
 
  
  and I would like to get the odds of surviving at each level of Covariate
  under treatment and control
  for each level of covariate adjusted for the confounder. I have looked
  at contrast in the Design 
  library but I don't think it gives me the right quantity, for instance 
  
  contrast(fit,list(covariate=A, Therapy=Treated,
  confounder=median(myDat$confounder), X=TRUE)
  ( A is the baseline level of Covariate) 
  
  gives me beta0 + beta_Treated + beta_confounder*68  
  
  Is this correctly interpreted as the conditional odds of dying? 
  As to the 1st contrast I am not sure how to get it, would it be using
  type = 'average' with some weights 
  in contrast? The answers are probably staring me in the face, i am just
  not seeing them today.
 
 contrast( ) is for contrasts (differences).  Sounds like you want 
 predicted values.  Do ?predict  ?predict.lrm  ?predict.Design.  Also do 
 ?gendata which will generate a data frame for getting predictors, with 
 unspecified predictors set to reference values such as medians.
 
 Frank
 
  
  Nicholas
  
  
  
 
 
 -- 
 Frank E Harrell Jr   Professor and Chair   School of Medicine
   Department of Biostatistics   Vanderbilt University

__
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] complex contrasts and logistic regression

2007-06-16 Thread Frank E Harrell Jr
Nicholas Lewin-Koh wrote:
 Hi,
 I am doing a retrospective analysis on a cohort from a designed trial,
 and I am fitting
 the model
 
 fit-glmD(survived ~ Covariate*Therapy + confounder,myDat,X=TRUE,
 Y=TRUE, family=binomial()) 

For logistic regression you can also use Design's lrm function which 
gives you more options.

 
 My covariate has three levels (A,B and C) and therapy has two
 (treated and control), confounder is a continuous variable.
 Also patients were randomized to treatment in the trial, but Covariate
 is something that is measured
 posthoc and can vary in the population.

If by posthoc you mean that the covariate is measured after baseline, it 
is difficult to get an interpretable analysis.

  
 I am trying to wrap my head around how to calculate a few quantities
 from the model
 and get reasonable confidence intervals for them, namely I would like to
 test
 
 H0: gamma=0, where gamma is the regression coefficient of the odds
 ratios of surviving
  under treatment vs control at each level of Covariate
  (adjusted for the confounder)

You mean regression coefficient on the log odds ratio scale.  This is 
easy to do with the contrast( ) function in Design.  Do ?contrast.Design 
for details and examples.

 
 and I would like to get the odds of surviving at each level of Covariate
 under treatment and control
 for each level of covariate adjusted for the confounder. I have looked
 at contrast in the Design 
 library but I don't think it gives me the right quantity, for instance 
 
 contrast(fit,list(covariate=A, Therapy=Treated,
 confounder=median(myDat$confounder), X=TRUE)
 ( A is the baseline level of Covariate) 
 
 gives me beta0 + beta_Treated + beta_confounder*68  
 
 Is this correctly interpreted as the conditional odds of dying? 
 As to the 1st contrast I am not sure how to get it, would it be using
 type = 'average' with some weights 
 in contrast? The answers are probably staring me in the face, i am just
 not seeing them today.

contrast( ) is for contrasts (differences).  Sounds like you want 
predicted values.  Do ?predict  ?predict.lrm  ?predict.Design.  Also do 
?gendata which will generate a data frame for getting predictors, with 
unspecified predictors set to reference values such as medians.

Frank

 
 Nicholas
 
 
 


-- 
Frank E Harrell Jr   Professor and Chair   School of Medicine
  Department of Biostatistics   Vanderbilt University

__
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


[R] complex contrasts and logistic regression

2007-06-15 Thread Nicholas Lewin-Koh
Hi,
I am doing a retrospective analysis on a cohort from a designed trial,
and I am fitting
the model

fit-glmD(survived ~ Covariate*Therapy + confounder,myDat,X=TRUE,
Y=TRUE, family=binomial()) 

My covariate has three levels (A,B and C) and therapy has two
(treated and control), confounder is a continuous variable.
Also patients were randomized to treatment in the trial, but Covariate
is something that is measured
posthoc and can vary in the population.
 
I am trying to wrap my head around how to calculate a few quantities
from the model
and get reasonable confidence intervals for them, namely I would like to
test

H0: gamma=0, where gamma is the regression coefficient of the odds
ratios of surviving
 under treatment vs control at each level of Covariate
 (adjusted for the confounder)

and I would like to get the odds of surviving at each level of Covariate
under treatment and control
for each level of covariate adjusted for the confounder. I have looked
at contrast in the Design 
library but I don't think it gives me the right quantity, for instance 

contrast(fit,list(covariate=A, Therapy=Treated,
confounder=median(myDat$confounder), X=TRUE)
( A is the baseline level of Covariate) 

gives me beta0 + beta_Treated + beta_confounder*68  

Is this correctly interpreted as the conditional odds of dying? 
As to the 1st contrast I am not sure how to get it, would it be using
type = 'average' with some weights 
in contrast? The answers are probably staring me in the face, i am just
not seeing them today.

Nicholas

__
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.