Hello,
I'm very sorry for my repeated question, which i asked 2 weeks ago, namely:
i'm interested in possibly simple random-part specification in the call
of GLMM(...) (from lme4-package)
i have a random blocked structure (i.e. ~var.a1+var.a2+var.a3,
hello!
this is a question, how can i specify the random part in the GLMM-call
(of the lme4 library) for compound matrices just in the the same way as
they defined in the lme-Call (of the nlme library). For example
i would just need
random=list(my.Subject=pdBlocked(list(pdIdent(~...
Pavel == Pavel Khomski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Tue, 08 Feb 2005 10:20:03 +0100 writes:
Pavel this is a question, how can i specify the random part
Pavel in the GLMM-call (of the lme4 library) for compound
Pavel matrices just in the the same way as they defined in
Pavel the
I guess Martin is struggling to have the most entries in the next version
of fortunes ;-)
Well... I hope so! Or we should really do something for new users - letting
any R core team member getting convulsive is dangerous for the futuRe.
Best wishes,
Eric
Pavel this is a question, how can i
Martin Maechler wrote:
Pavel == Pavel Khomski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Tue, 08 Feb 2005 10:20:03 +0100 writes:
Pavel this is a question, how can i specify the random part
Pavel in the GLMM-call (of the lme4 library) for compound
Pavel matrices just in the the same way as they defined
For OBVIOUS reasons, is there any chance that we could introduce
package() and deprecate library()?
(well, I'll also ask if we could deprecate = for assignment, but
that's hopeless).
best,
-tony
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 11:49:39 +0100, Martin Maechler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pavel == Pavel
A.J. Rossini [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For OBVIOUS reasons, is there any chance that we could introduce
package() and deprecate library()?
usepackage() or usePackage() has been suggested, but someone got
ambitious and wanted it to be different from library(), and it sort of
didn't get any
Dear all,
1. How do I compute the fixed-effects var-cov matrix from a GLMM object
(lme4 package) fitted with the Laplace method?
details: the vcov method for GLMM objects does not seem to work in this
case: returns a 0 * 0 matrix:
fm1 - GLMM(immun ~ kid2p + mom25p + ord,
+ family =
