-Original Message-
From: Prof Brian Ripley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 November 2004 15:32
To: Dan Bebber
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [R] summary.lme() vs. anova.lme()
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Dan Bebber wrote:
I modelled changes in a variable (mconc) over time (d
Dear R list:
I modelled changes in a variable (mconc) over time (d) for individuals
(replicate) given one of three treatments (treatment) using:
mconc.lme - lme(mconc~treatment*poly(d,2), random=~poly(d,2)|replicate,
data=my.data)
summary(mconc.lme) shows that the linear coefficient of one of
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 3:35 PM
Subject: [R] summary.lme() vs. anova.lme()
Dear R list:
I modelled changes in a variable (mconc) over time (d) for
individuals
(replicate) given one of three treatments (treatment) using:
mconc.lme - lme(mconc~treatment*poly(d,2),
random=~poly(d
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Dan Bebber wrote:
I modelled changes in a variable (mconc) over time (d) for individuals
(replicate) given one of three treatments (treatment) using:
mconc.lme - lme(mconc~treatment*poly(d,2), random=~poly(d,2)|replicate,
data=my.data)
summary(mconc.lme) shows that the linear
