Philippe Grosjean wrote:
John W. Eaton wrote:
On 17-Nov-2004, Philippe Grosjean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| - There is no possibility to make a commercial GUI for R (thanks to
| the GPL),
This is false. Please don't confuse commercial (Red Hat
and SuSE GNU/Linux distributions are commercial
John W. Eaton wrote:
On 17-Nov-2004, Philippe Grosjean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| - There is no possibility to make a commercial GUI for R (thanks to
| the GPL),
This is false. Please don't confuse commercial (Red Hat
and SuSE GNU/Linux distributions are commercial software)
with
Hello,
I appreciate many comments and the various points of view, especially
because there are a couple of clear explanations why several people do not
need (or even do not want) a GUI for R!
Another part of the discussion seems to switch to the never-ending question
of what kind of GUI... which
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, Philippe Grosjean wrote:
John W. Eaton wrote:
On 17-Nov-2004, Philippe Grosjean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| - There is no possibility to make a commercial GUI for R (thanks to
| the GPL),
This is false. Please don't confuse commercial (Red Hat
and SuSE GNU/Linux distributions
Patrick Burns wrote:
I'm a big advocate -- perhaps even fanatic -- of making R easier for
novices in order to spread its use, but I'm not convinced that a GUI
(at least in the traditional form) is the most valuable approach.
Perhaps an overly harsh summary of some of Ted Harding's statements
is:
