Packages and Libraries (was: Re: lme4 package etc {Re: [R] lme4 -- GLMM}

2005-02-08 Thread A.J. Rossini 
For OBVIOUS reasons, is there any chance that we could introduce
package() and deprecate library()?

(well, I'll also ask if we could deprecate = for assignment, but
that's hopeless).

best,
-tony


On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 11:49:39 +0100, Martin Maechler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Pavel == Pavel Khomski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  on Tue, 08 Feb 2005 10:20:03 +0100 writes:
 
Pavel this is a question, how can i specify the random part
Pavel in the GLMM-call (of the lme4 library) for compound
Pavel matrices just in the the same way as they defined in
Pavel the lme-Call (of the nlme library).
 
 ``twice in such a short paragraph -- yikes !!'' ... I'm getting
 convulsive...
 
 There is NO lme4 library nor an nlme one !
 There's the lme4 *PACKAGE* and the nlme *PACKAGE* -- please --
 
 (If the nlme package is built, it will rely on a nlme.so or
 nlme.dll (or nlme.dylib ...) *library* of compiled C code,
 and if packages are installed,
 they are installed into a library of packages;
 typically into one of the libraries in .libPaths()
 )
 
 whooh Martin
 
 __
 R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
 https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
 PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
 


-- 
best,
-tony

Commit early,commit often, and commit in a repository from which we can easily
roll-back your mistakes (AJR, 4Jan05).

A.J. Rossini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html

Re: Packages and Libraries (was: Re: lme4 package etc {Re: [R] lme4 -- GLMM}

2005-02-08 Thread Peter Dalgaard 
A.J. Rossini [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 For OBVIOUS reasons, is there any chance that we could introduce
 package() and deprecate library()?

usepackage() or usePackage() has been suggested, but someone got
ambitious and wanted it to be different from library(), and it sort of
didn't get any further. We still have some time before feature freeze
for 2.1.0 though.

 (well, I'll also ask if we could deprecate = for assignment, but
 that's hopeless).

You're not *forced* to use it...

-- 
   O__   Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3  
  c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N   
 (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen   Denmark  Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~ - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) FAX: (+45) 35327907

__
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html