On 03/01/2018 8:35 PM, Lenth, Russell V wrote:
Developers:
Lately (the past month or so), I have been getting a ton of messages like the
following whenever I rebuild my package:
Rd warning: H:/progs/R/devel/EMMEANS/emmeans/man/xtable.emmGrid.Rd:57:
missing file link 'print.xtableList'
Developers:
Lately (the past month or so), I have been getting a ton of messages like the
following whenever I rebuild my package:
Rd warning: H:/progs/R/devel/EMMEANS/emmeans/man/xtable.emmGrid.Rd:57:
missing file link 'print.xtableList'
The flagged line 57 in xtable.emmGrid.Rd looks
Hi,
We faced a problem when we tried Dirk's solution for our package
rvinecopulib: there is a strip binary on OS X but it doesn't work as the
linux one.
As such, to avoid calling OS X's strip which doesn't work, we use:
strippedLib: $(SHLIB)
if test -e "/usr/bin/strip" & test -e "/bin/uname" &
Christopher,
On 3 January 2018 at 21:59, Christopher Lalansingh wrote:
| I'm running into troubles with the total size of my package and I've found
that when using Rcpp, one can reduce the size of shared objects by stripping
out debug symbols by including `-Wl,-S' in PKG_LIBS. Unfortunately
Hello all,
I'm running into troubles with the total size of my package and I've found that
when using Rcpp, one can reduce the size of shared objects by stripping out
debug symbols by including `-Wl,-S' in PKG_LIBS. Unfortunately this is not
portable with Solaris, and using ifeq in my
Yep. Bear in mind that many system-wide installation, e.g. in universities, are
of .0 or .1 releases and upgraded yearly. If we end up with packages depending
on packages depending on a later version, bad things can happen (and _did_
happen in the 3.2.* series). For the same reason, we have
On 03.01.2018 13:59, Hockemeyer, Cord (cord.hockeme...@uni-graz.at) wrote:
Hi everybody,
on submitting a new package I got a rejection because of the above warning in the CRAN-check. I guess
it is because of the "Depends" entry "R (>= 3.3.3)" in the DESCRIPTION file but
I have no idea how
Hi everybody,
on submitting a new package I got a rejection because of the above warning in
the CRAN-check. I guess it is because of the "Depends" entry "R (>= 3.3.3)" in
the DESCRIPTION file but I have no idea how to do this otherwise. Any hel�p
would be highly appreciated.
Best regards,
