Do note that ?asNamespace says:
"Not **intended** to be called directly," (emphasis added)
but not "should never be called directly" or some such. I don't know if
this makes a difference to package checking, but it isn't clear to me that
it would.
Cheers,
Bert Gunter
"The trouble with having an
At least one package on CRAN uses
get("foo", envir=asNamespace("imported_package"))
and passes check.
Is this known?
-Naras
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
On 6/15/20 6:52 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 15/06/2020 12:30 p.m., Daniel Kelley wrote:
Duncan, thanks very much for that very helpful hint. I got as
follows. My guess is that the first column in rdx$variables is an
address offset, and so it seems that the lion's share of the storage
is
I found as Duncan, but then I saw
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54144239/how-to-use-saverds-refhook-parameter
and found more info as follows. (It will take me a while to go through the
output, but basically I am seeing code from the "oce" package, which makes me
think I ought to get rid
On 15/06/2020 1:24 p.m., Ivan Krylov wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 12:52:20 -0400
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
maybe someone else can suggest how to read an object from
the .rdb file using R code. Internally R uses C code for this.
This function seems to work for me:
# filename: the .rdb file
#
On 15/06/2020 12:05 p.m., Martin Maechler wrote:
Duncan Murdoch on Sun, 14 Jun 2020 07:28:03 -0400 writes:
> I agree with almost everything you wrote, except one thing: this isn't
> newly enforced, it has been enforced since the help system began. What
> I think is new is
Duncan, thanks very much for that very helpful hint. I got as follows. My
guess is that the first column in rdx$variables is an address offset, and so it
seems that the lion's share of the storage is dedicated to items with names
starting with a decimal point. For example, the "[[" item is
> Duncan Murdoch on Sun, 14 Jun 2020 07:28:03 -0400 writes:
> I agree with almost everything you wrote, except one thing: this isn't
> newly enforced, it has been enforced since the help system began. What
> I think is new is that there are now tests for it. Previously
On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 11:13:21 +
Daniel Kelley wrote:
> A possible clue is that I get a large-file note on macOS, but not
> when I use rhub for test linux builds, or winbuilder for a windows
> build. I do not have ready access to either linux or windows
> machines, to examine those builds in
I can't install your package (I don't have an up to date GDAL), but
maybe this is some help:
- Package dependencies aren't included, except possibly for static
linking of C/Fortran/C++ code. Those normally won't end up in an .rdb file.
- .rdb files are part of the lazy load mechanism. You
I am working on a package (https://github.com/ArgoCanada/argoFloats) that has a
412K source tarball (most of which is data; the R code is 176K), but that
creates a library .rdb file of MUCH larger size, namely 7.2M. This file causes
a build NOTE, being over the threshold of 1M, and that
11 matches
Mail list logo
