On 19/10/2020 1:05 p.m., Spencer Graves wrote:
On 2020-10-19 10:34, Rafael H. M. Pereira wrote:
Thank you Dirk and Hugo for your responses. I guess I'll just have to be
patient and wait.
I can only imagine how the CRAN team is overwhelmed by the exponential
growth of package submissions. I
My 'revdepcheck' is obsolete, superseded by r-lib/revdepcheck (which
it does predate by about a year ...)
Dirk Eddelbuettel maintains an automated system for diffs of the CRAN
repository policy https://github.com/eddelbuettel/crp , or follow
@CRANPolicyWatch -- similar to your idea about
On 2020-10-19 10:34, Rafael H. M. Pereira wrote:
Thank you Dirk and Hugo for your responses. I guess I'll just have to be
patient and wait.
I can only imagine how the CRAN team is overwhelmed by the exponential
growth of package submissions. I wonder, though, whether the CRAN
maintainers
Thank you Dirk and Hugo for your responses. I guess I'll just have to be
patient and wait.
I can only imagine how the CRAN team is overwhelmed by the exponential
growth of package submissions. I wonder, though, whether the CRAN
maintainers and the R community more broadly are thinking about
Hi all,
this is a bit tricky since the documentation on the dashboard comes from
an official, authoritative, source: the R journal [1].
"pending: if a decision is pending a response from the package
maintainer: If an additional issue was present in the package that we
cannot check for in
Hello,
Usually such problems with pkgdown will come from your pkgdown configuration. I
see (thanks to a search engine :-) and sorry if my search result is wrong )
that you actually write to exclude all articles
* your configuration
