But the example timing...:
Please reduce each example to less than 5 sec.

Best,
Uwe Ligges

On 17.08.2021 15:53, Aisouda Hoshiyar wrote:
* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
Maintainer: ‘Aisouda Hoshiyar <aisouda.hoshi...@hsu-hh.de>’

is just a change of the maintainer and already declared in my cran-comments.md 
file.

Best
Aisouda



Am 17.08.2021 um 15:42 schrieb Gábor Csárdi <csardi.ga...@gmail.com>:

I think they are this:

* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
...

and this:

* checking examples ... [76s/77s] NOTE
Examples with CPU (user + system) or elapsed time > 5s
                  user system elapsed
ordPens-package 54.112  0.044  54.158
ordPCA          18.377  0.004  18.382

G.

On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 3:38 PM Aisouda Hoshiyar
<aisouda.hoshi...@hsu-hh.de <mailto:aisouda.hoshi...@hsu-hh.de>> wrote:

The CRAN (pretest) email states:

package ordPens_1.0.0.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks automatically, 
please see the following pre-tests:
Debian: 
<https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/00check.log 
<https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/00check.log>
 
<https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/00check.log 
<https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/00check.log>>>
Status: 2 NOTEs

Last released version's CRAN status: NOTE: 13
See: <https://CRAN.R-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html 
<https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html> 
<https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html 
<https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html>>>

Please fix all problems and resubmit a fixed version via the webform.
If you are fairly certain the rejection is a false positive, please reply-all 
to this message and explain.

I really don’t understand how else to fix (and what to fix). These are out of 
date problems of version 0.3-1, which are not relevant any more in version 1.0.0
Version 1.0.0 exactly was a fix to those.

Do you think I can reply-all & explain that this must be a false-positive?

Best
Aisouda



Am 17.08.2021 um 15:22 schrieb Georgi Boshnakov <georgi.boshna...@manchester.ac.uk 
<mailto:georgi.boshna...@manchester.ac.uk>>:

When the previous version has problems, you get an email listing them, followed 
with something like 'Did you fix them? Please Reply-All...'

Maybe you missed the last phrase?

Georgi Boshnakov



Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>>
From: R-package-devel <r-package-devel-boun...@r-project.org 
<mailto:r-package-devel-boun...@r-project.org>> on behalf of Aisouda Hoshiyar 
<aisouda.hoshi...@hsu-hh.de <mailto:aisouda.hoshi...@hsu-hh.de>>
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2021 12:59:13 PM
To: r-package-devel@r-project.org <mailto:r-package-devel@r-project.org> 
<r-package-devel@r-project.org <mailto:r-package-devel@r-project.org>>
Subject: [R-pkg-devel] submitting package update failed, since old version out 
of date (?)

Hi,

submitting an update of our package ordPens failed (update version is 1.0.0), 
reporting the following:
Version: 1.0.0
ok
Version: 0.3-1
Check: R code for possible problems, Result: NOTE
  genRidge: no visible global function definition for 'plogis'
  ordGene: no visible global function definition for 'anova'
  ordGene: no visible global function definition for 'lm'
  ordSelect: no visible binding for global variable 'sd'
  ordSmooth: no visible binding for global variable 'sd'
  plot.ordPen: no visible global function definition for 'grey'
  plot.ordPen: no visible global function definition for 'devAskNewPage'
  plot.ordPen: no visible global function definition for 'lines'
  predict.ordPen: no visible global function definition for 'plogis'
  Undefined global functions or variables:
    anova devAskNewPage grey lines lm plogis sd
  Consider adding
    importFrom("grDevices", "devAskNewPage", "grey")
    importFrom("graphics", "lines")
    importFrom("stats", "anova", "lm", "plogis", "sd")
  to your NAMESPACE file.
Version: 0.3-1
Check: package dependencies, Result: NOTE
  Package suggested but not available for checking: ‘IsoGene’
https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html 
<https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html> 
<https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html 
<https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html>> 
<https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html 
<https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html> 
<https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html 
<https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html>>>

https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/ 
<https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/><https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/
 <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/>> 
<https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/ 
<https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/><https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/
 <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/>>>

But these are exactly the new changes that we already took care of in the 
updated version 1.0.0
The previous version 0.3-1 is from 2015 and due to R updates, the old package 
won’t work any more.
That is exactly the reason for update version 1.0.0, were everything is fixed 
now.

Also,
- there is a NOTE about change in maintainer, which is already stated in the 
cran-comments.md, and the previous maintainer sent an e-main to CRAN as well
- there is a NOTE saying 'Examples with CPU (user + system) or elapsed time > 
10s‘
which is also stated in the cran-comments.md explaining that cross-validation 
examples are important for illustrating the package usage.


So is this a false positive?

Best
Aisouda





        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org> mailing 
list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel 
<https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel> 
<https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel 
<https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel>>


        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org> mailing 
list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel 
<https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel>

        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel


______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

Reply via email to