Re: [R-pkg-devel] New Package Removal because Shared Library Too Large from Debugging Symbols

Hi Uwe, You’re completely right. I misunderstood the “additional issue” and thought it was referring to the “NOTE.” Thanks for the help! Best, Hans > Uwe Ligges 於 2024年1月20日 下午7:12 寫道： > > Others have pointed you to the Additional issue, namely LTO. > > But I really cannot resist: > You omi

Re: [R-pkg-devel] New Package Removal because Shared Library Too Large from Debugging Symbols

Hi Ivan, Thanks, this is very helpful! You are completely right that I misread the message. I will try including that header in `cpp11.cpp`. Unfortunately, that’s supposed to be programmatically generated, so I’m not sure what the “right" fix is: most likely there’s some error on my part in ho

Re: [R-pkg-devel] New Package Removal because Shared Library Too Large from Debugging Symbols

Others have pointed you to the Additional issue, namely LTO. But I really cannot resist: You omitted a line from our message that actually explains it. We wrote: "Do remember to look at the 'Additional issues'." Best, Uwe Ligges On 20.01.2024 20:38, Johann Gaebler wrote: Hi everyone, I re

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Inquiry Regarding Package Organization in CRAN

On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 8:41 PM Protsak Andriy via R-package-devel wrote: > > Hi all! > > > > My name is Andriy, and I’m a student at University of Alcalá, currently > working on my final year project. > > > > I’m tasked with organizing the R packages developed by our university that > are curre

Re: [R-pkg-devel] New Package Removal because Shared Library Too Large from Debugging Symbols

В Sat, 20 Jan 2024 14:38:55 -0500 Johann Gaebler пишет: > The issue is that the compiled libraries are too large. Was it in the e-mail? As you quite correctly observed, many other packages get the NOTE about shared library size. It may be not exactly obvious, but the red link saying "LTO" on th

Re: [R-pkg-devel] New Package Removal because Shared Library Too Large from Debugging Symbols

Are you sure the issue that CRAN has is the library sizes, and not the issues flagged by the "LTO" platform ? https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/bdr/LTO/rar.out I would check with CRAN for clarification before you spend a lot of time trying

Re: [R-pkg-devel] New Package Removal because Shared Library Too Large from Debugging Symbols

Johann, On 20 January 2024 at 14:38, Johann Gaebler wrote: | Hi everyone, | | I received the following message regarding `rar` , a package that I put up on CRAN two days ago: | | > Dear maintainer, | > | > Please see the problems shown on | >

[R-pkg-devel] New Package Removal because Shared Library Too Large from Debugging Symbols

Hi everyone, I received the following message regarding `rar` , a package that I put up on CRAN two days ago: > Dear maintainer, > > Please see the problems shown on > . > > Please correct b

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Inquiry Regarding Package Organization in CRAN

Dear Andriy I would second the advice that David and Ivan have already given. I woouls also add that I suspect that most users search for packages by functionality so you might want to study techniques for search engine optimisation and then advise authors how to increase the visibility of th