The built-in way is to put those tests in a separate directory, and
specify that directory when you run R CMD check. For example, rgl has
directory "inst/slowTests", and I use these options to R CMD check:
--test-dir=inst/slowTests
Duncan Murdoch
On 08/06/2020 10:52 a.m., Spencer Graves wro
s:
https://github.com/easystats/insight/blob/cddc6df6783aae859f2b707dd5a938493bff3aaa/tests/testthat/test-spatial.R#L141
Hope this helps!
Best
Daniel
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: R-package-devel Im Auftrag von
Spencer Graves
Gesendet: Montag, 8. Juni 2020 16:53
An: r-package-devel@r-proj
On 08.06.2020 17:02, Gábor Csárdi wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 3:58 PM Uwe Ligges
wrote:
[...]
Nor do I how they can find out, as our idea is that CRAN cannot be
special cased.
If you want to run additional tests, you can execute them if some env
var is set that you define on machines where
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 3:58 PM Uwe Ligges
wrote:
[...]
> Nor do I how they can find out, as our idea is that CRAN cannot be
> special cased.
> If you want to run additional tests, you can execute them if some env
> var is set that you define on machines where you want to run the
> additional tests
On 08.06.2020 16:52, Spencer Graves wrote:
Hi, Uwe et al.:
What's the preferred way to eliminate tests on CRAN that the
maintainer still wants to run on other platforms?
For several years, I've been using "if(!fda::CRAN()){...}". I've
been told that I should NOT do that, b
Hi, Uwe et al.:
What's the preferred way to eliminate tests on CRAN that the
maintainer still wants to run on other platforms?
For several years, I've been using "if(!fda::CRAN()){...}". I've
been told that I should NOT do that, but it has worked for me, and I
haven't found any
Hello Uwe,
OK sorry for that.
Best wishes.
*Stefano *
Stefano Mangiola | Postdoctoral fellow
Papenfuss Laboratory
The Walter Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
+61 (0)466452544
Il giorno mar 9 giu 2020 alle ore 00:40 Uwe Ligges <
lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de> ha scritto:
>
>
>
On 08.06.2020 16:26, stefano wrote:
Hello,
I would like to point out that I (and others in various forums) find that
the CRAN check with the note :
*checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTEMaintainer*
Not true, it also says
Flavor: r-devel-windows-ix86+x86_64
Check: running examples
Hello,
I would like to point out that I (and others in various forums) find that
the CRAN check with the note :
*checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTEMaintainer*
Triggers an email saying
1) *package nanny_0.1.7.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks
automatically*
2) *Please fix all
