On 6/21/23 8:33 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 17:39:48 -0400
wrote:
If you really need a new package name, is there an accepted way to
update the old name to at least provide a message for a while as to
the new name to use and perhaps have the load otherwise fail?
I don't
On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 17:39:48 -0400
wrote:
> If you really need a new package name, is there an accepted way to
> update the old name to at least provide a message for a while as to
> the new name to use and perhaps have the load otherwise fail?
I don't know about "accepted", but the following
Dear All,
Thanks very much for the positive and helpful replies here.
All the best,
William
> On 20/06/2023 19:36 CEST Uwe Ligges wrote:
>
>
> On 20.06.2023 18:00, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> >
> > Hi William,
> >
> > On 20 June 2023 at 16:06, William Becker wrote:
> > | I am the
, June 20, 2023 12:00 PM
To: William Becker
Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Change package name
Hi William,
On 20 June 2023 at 16:06, William Becker wrote:
| I am the maintainer of a package which is unfortunately involved in a
complicated dispute regarding its
On 20.06.2023 18:00, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
Hi William,
On 20 June 2023 at 16:06, William Becker wrote:
| I am the maintainer of a package which is unfortunately involved in a complicated
dispute regarding its intellectual property (since the package was partly built under a
contract
I second Dirk's suggestion to address this issue directly to CRAN. I had
one of my packages changed once from "Reot" to "remote" (which enables
calculation of empirical orthogonal teleconnections as introduced by van
den Dool 2000) and had to present some convincing arguments to do so (in
quite a
Hi William,
On 20 June 2023 at 16:06, William Becker wrote:
| I am the maintainer of a package which is unfortunately involved in a
complicated dispute regarding its intellectual property (since the package was
partly built under a contract with an organisation), but also the "branding" of
Dear All,
I am the maintainer of a package which is unfortunately involved in a
complicated dispute regarding its intellectual property (since the package was
partly built under a contract with an organisation), but also the "branding" of
the package, i.e. the name.
The story is long and
