Yes, the resubmission and re-building has fixed the problem with buildmer/
Matrix.
Carl
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 12:17 PM Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> I see the same thing. This sounds like a problem in the handling of
> methods that has been discussed somewhat recently:
>
>
It seems that this could be mostly avoided if instead of caching copies
of Matrix methods when buildmer was installed, R would cache promises to
get those methods. Then if the method for some particular signature
changed, on first use buildmer would retrieve the current version.
There would
Please let the Simon (Mac maintainer for CRAN) know.
For Windows, the revdeps get rebuild automatically.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 19.10.2022 09:39, Martin Maechler wrote:
Duncan Murdoch
on Tue, 18 Oct 2022 15:17:33 -0400 writes:
> I see the same thing. This sounds like a problem in
> Duncan Murdoch
> on Tue, 18 Oct 2022 15:17:33 -0400 writes:
> I see the same thing. This sounds like a problem in the handling of
> methods that has been discussed somewhat recently:
> https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2022-September/081971.html
> The
I see the same thing. This sounds like a problem in the handling of
methods that has been discussed somewhat recently:
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2022-September/081971.html
The problem is that when the binary is built, some code from other
packages is kept as part of it. When
