Re: [R-pkg-devel] Inconsistent R CMD Check results

2023-01-25 Thread Ying Li via R-package-devel
: [R-pkg-devel] Inconsistent R CMD Check results On 24.01.2023 22:03, Tomas Kalibera wrote: > On 1/23/23 17:51, Ying Li via R-package-devel wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> Hope you are well! Recently, in the check before a re-submission, I >> got an unexpected note when doin

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Inconsistent R CMD Check results

2023-01-25 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 24.01.2023 22:03, Tomas Kalibera wrote: On 1/23/23 17:51, Ying Li via R-package-devel wrote: Dear all, Hope you are well! Recently, in the check before a re-submission, I got an unexpected note when doing R CMD Check using rhub::check_for_cran(), saying that "Examples with CPU (user +

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Inconsistent R CMD Check results

2023-01-24 Thread Tomas Kalibera
On 1/23/23 17:51, Ying Li via R-package-devel wrote: Dear all, Hope you are well! Recently, in the check before a re-submission, I got an unexpected note when doing R CMD Check using rhub::check_for_cran(), saying that "Examples with CPU (user + system) or elapsed time > 5s". I didn't expect

[R-pkg-devel] Inconsistent R CMD Check results

2023-01-24 Thread Ying Li via R-package-devel
Dear all, Hope you are well! Recently, in the check before a re-submission, I got an unexpected note when doing R CMD Check using rhub::check_for_cran(), saying that "Examples with CPU (user + system) or elapsed time > 5s". I didn't expect this note to appear because the same examples didn't