2023 12:11 PM
To: Vladimir Dergachev
Cc: McGrath, Justin M; r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Wrong mailing list: Could the 100 byte path length
limit be lifted?
Compiled code is another source of long names. Some libraries are produced by companies
with style re
vs 160 characters for just a directory path.
From: Steven Scott
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2023 12:11 PM
To: Vladimir Dergachev
Cc: McGrath, Justin M; r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Wrong mailing list: Could the 100 byte path
Compiled code is another source of long names. Some libraries are produced
by companies with style restrictions that demand LongDescriptiveNames for
functions and classes, and which expect file names to match the name of the
class contained within. If you've got
On Wed, 13 Dec 2023, McGrath, Justin M wrote:
On Windows, packages will be in "C:\Users\[User Name]\Documents\R\win-library\[R
version]\[Package Name]".
With a 150 byte limit, that leaves 70 bytes for the user name, R version
and package name. That seems more than sufficient. If people
Tomas Kalibera
> Cc: Dirk Eddelbuettel; McGrath, Justin M; Ben Bolker; Martin Maechler;
> r-package-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Wrong mailing list: Could the 100 byte path length
> limit be lifted?
>
>
> On 13 December 2023 at 16:02, Tomas Kalibera wrote:
>
>r-package-devel@r-project.org
>Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Wrong mailing list: Could the 100 byte path length
>limit be lifted?
>
>
>On 13 December 2023 at 15:32, Tomas Kalibera wrote:
>| Please don't forget about what has been correctly mentioned on this
>| thread alread
roject.org
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Wrong mailing list: Could the 100 byte path length
limit be lifted?
On 13 December 2023 at 16:02, Tomas Kalibera wrote:
|
| On 12/13/23 15:59, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > On 13 December 2023 at 15:32, Tomas Kalibera wrote:
| > | Please don't forget abo
.
From: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2023 8:59 AM
To: Tomas Kalibera
Cc: McGrath, Justin M; Ben Bolker; Martin Maechler;
r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Wrong mailing list: Could the 100 byte path length
limit be lifted?
On 13 December 2023 at 15:32
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Wrong mailing list: Could the 100 byte path length
limit be lifted?
On 12/13/23 14:56, McGrath, Justin M wrote:
>> Thanks. Pursuing this a bit further, from ?tar "Known problems":
> > The handling of file paths of more than 100 bytes. These
>
On 13 December 2023 at 16:02, Tomas Kalibera wrote:
|
| On 12/13/23 15:59, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > On 13 December 2023 at 15:32, Tomas Kalibera wrote:
| > | Please don't forget about what has been correctly mentioned on this
| > | thread already: there is essentially a 260 character limit
On 12/13/23 15:59, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 13 December 2023 at 15:32, Tomas Kalibera wrote:
| Please don't forget about what has been correctly mentioned on this
| thread already: there is essentially a 260 character limit on Windows
| (see
|
On 13 December 2023 at 15:32, Tomas Kalibera wrote:
| Please don't forget about what has been correctly mentioned on this
| thread already: there is essentially a 260 character limit on Windows
| (see
| https://blog.r-project.org/2023/03/07/path-length-limit-on-windows/index.html
| for
On 12/13/23 14:56, McGrath, Justin M wrote:
Thanks. Pursuing this a bit further, from ?tar "Known problems":
> The handling of file paths of more than 100 bytes. These
> were unsupported in early versions of ‘tar’, and supported in
> one way by POSIX ‘tar’ and in another by GNU
check reports a NOTE?
Best wishes,
Justin
From: Martin Maechler
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2023 2:22 AM
To: Ben Bolker; McGrath, Justin M
Cc: Simon Urbanek; Duncan Murdoch
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Wrong mailing list: Could the 100 byte path length
limit be lifted?
>&g
Maechler
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2023 10:13 AM
To: McGrath, Justin M
Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Wrong mailing list: [R-pkg-devel] Could the 100 byte path
length limit be lifted?
McGrath, Justin M
on Tue, 12 Dec 2023 15:03:28 + writes:
We include other software in
rom: Martin Maechler
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2023 10:13 AM
To: McGrath, Justin M
Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Wrong mailing list: [R-pkg-devel] Could the 100 byte path length limit
be lifted?
McGrath, Justin M
on Tue, 12 Dec 2023 15:03:28 + writes:
We include ot
ist: [R-pkg-devel] Could the 100 byte path length limit
be lifted?
McGrath, Justin M
on Tue, 12 Dec 2023 15:03:28 + writes:
We include other software in our source code. It has some long paths so a few
of the files end up with paths longer than 100 bytes, and we need to manually
ren
er 12, 2023 10:13 AM
> To: McGrath, Justin M
> Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: Wrong mailing list: [R-pkg-devel] Could the 100 byte path length
> limit be lifted?
>
>>>>>> McGrath, Justin M
>>>>>>on Tue, 12 Dec 2023 15:03:2
-devel] Could the 100 byte path length limit
be lifted?
>>>>> McGrath, Justin M
>>>>> on Tue, 12 Dec 2023 15:03:28 + writes:
> We include other software in our source code. It has some long paths so a
few of the files end up with paths longer than 10
> McGrath, Justin M
> on Tue, 12 Dec 2023 15:03:28 + writes:
> We include other software in our source code. It has some long paths so a
few of the files end up with paths longer than 100 bytes, and we need to
manually rename them whenever we pull in updates.
> The 100
20 matches
Mail list logo
