Re: [R-pkg-devel] Winbuilder down?

Dear Uwe, Mea culpa. that was a false alarm. I forgot that the email goes to the maintainer, which is not me. Apologies. -Naras On 2/1/24 7:40 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote: Dear Naras, the queues are empty, so everything has been processed. Which package are you talking about? Then I can take a

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Winbuilder down?

Dear Naras, the queues are empty, so everything has been processed. Which package are you talking about? Then I can take a look what went wrong. Best, Uwe On 01.02.2024 15:53, Balasubramanian Narasimhan wrote: Just FYI: Winbuilder seems to be unresponsive. My uploads over the last 2 days have

[R-pkg-devel] Winbuilder down?

Just FYI: Winbuilder seems to be unresponsive. My uploads over the last 2 days have not resulted in any output or messages. Thank you. -Naras __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

Re: [R-pkg-devel] winbuilder

Please delete drjimle...@gmail.com from your mailing list. He passed away a month ago. Regards, Juel Wife On Thu, 19 Oct 2023, 02:17 Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal via R-package-devel I am not sure who is the appropriate person to contact, but thought I > would try here since WInbuilder is a

Re: [R-pkg-devel] winbuilder

Not too long after I sent the message it came back up. Thanks! -Roy > On Oct 18, 2023, at 8:39 AM, Michael Dewey wrote: > > Dear Roy > > When I just checked using the winbuilder_queue function from the foghorn > package it seemed to respond and had one package in the queue. Not sure that

Re: [R-pkg-devel] winbuilder

Dear Roy When I just checked using the winbuilder_queue function from the foghorn package it seemed to respond and had one package in the queue. Not sure that is definitive evicence. Michael On 18/10/2023 16:16, Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal via R-package-devel wrote: I am not sure who

[R-pkg-devel] winbuilder

I am not sure who is the appropriate person to contact, but thought I would try here since WInbuilder is a big help in package testing. Winbuilder appears to be down at the moment. Thanks, -Roy ** "The contents of this message do not reflect any position of the U.S.

[R-pkg-devel] winbuilder and incoming checks offline on Nov 1 from 10 am CET

Dear all, winbuilder service and CRAN incoming checks (submission is possible) will be offlne tomorrow (Nov 1) from 10 am CET to not later than 6pm. Some CRAN hardware in Dortmund will be physically migrated to a new locatiom. Best, Uwe Ligges (CRAN team)

Re: [R-pkg-devel] WinBuilder error: dependency version not available

AN and > see if it works. > You may also just wait out until ggtree works on winbuilder... > > Regards, > Berry > > > > -- > *From:* R-package-devel on behalf > of Carrie Tribble > *Sent:* Friday, August 6, 2021 22:34 > *To:

Re: [R-pkg-devel] WinBuilder error: dependency version not available

To: r-package-devel@r-project.org Subject: [R-pkg-devel] WinBuilder error: dependency version not available I am in the final stages of preparing an R package <https://github.com/cmt2/RevGadgets/tree/development> to submit to CRAN. The package passes devtools::check() locally, GitHub A

[R-pkg-devel] WinBuilder error: dependency version not available

I am in the final stages of preparing an R package to submit to CRAN. The package passes devtools::check() locally, GitHub Actions on multiple systems (including windows), devtools::check_rhub() remotely, and rhub::check_on_windows(check_args =

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Winbuilder error for rgl on R 3.6.3

Dear Uwe, It worked this time, thanks. Apparently just a hiccup. Best, Tim > On 04/26/2021 11:18 PM Uwe Ligges wrote: > > > What happens if you simply try again? > > Best, > Uwe Ligges > > On 26.04.2021 20:32, Tim Schäfer wrote: > > Dear R experts, > > > > I am testing my R package

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Winbuilder error for rgl on R 3.6.3

What happens if you simply try again? Best, Uwe Ligges On 26.04.2021 20:32, Tim Schäfer wrote: Dear R experts, I am testing my R package 'fsbrain' using the Winbuilder service [1] before submitting a new version to CRAN. All checks pass under R versions 4.0.5 and 4.1.0 alpha, but the

[R-pkg-devel] Winbuilder error for rgl on R 3.6.3

Dear R experts, I am testing my R package 'fsbrain' using the Winbuilder service [1] before submitting a new version to CRAN. All checks pass under R versions 4.0.5 and 4.1.0 alpha, but the installation fails under R 3.6.3 because of a problem related to rgl, which is a dependency of my

[R-pkg-devel] Winbuilder seems stuck

This is just FYI to CRAN as no results came back from an upload over a day and a half ago. A repeat upload gives: ERROR: Access to the path 'C:\Inetpub\ftproot\R-devel\...' is denied. -Naras [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Winbuilder queues jammed again?

Download the 'rhub' package. Then submission to 'rhub' is one easy command. HTH, -Roy > On Mar 5, 2020, at 3:33 PM, Rolf Turner wrote: > > > On 6/03/20 11:14 am, Ben Bolker wrote: > > > >> It's probably been suggested already in this thread, but perhaps >> rhub would work for you as an

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Winbuilder queues jammed again?

On 6/03/20 11:14 am, Ben Bolker wrote: It's probably been suggested already in this thread, but perhaps rhub would work for you as an alternative? Quite possibly, but I have no real idea what "rhub" is. I've seen it referred to many times but the references always assume that you

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Winbuilder queues jammed again?

You can also just paste the ftp link into your browser. On Thursday, March 5, 2020, 6:31:03 PM EST, Rolf Turner wrote: On 6/03/20 11:41 am, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: > 1. I'd guess it helps Uwe a bit you clarify exactly which queue you > think is stuck - otherwise he has to check

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Winbuilder queues jammed again?

On 6/03/20 11:41 am, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: 1. I'd guess it helps Uwe a bit you clarify exactly which queue you think is stuck - otherwise he has to check them all. They're independent. Yeah. Sorry. It's the R-release queue. 2. You can look at the different win-builder queues yourself

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Winbuilder queues jammed again?

1. I'd guess it helps Uwe a bit you clarify exactly which queue you think is stuck - otherwise he has to check them all. They're independent. 2. You can look at the different win-builder queues yourself via ftp, see https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-package-devel/2020q1/005098.html /Henrik On

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Winbuilder queues jammed again?

Maybe there's something queriable similar to the CRAN queue? (In an ideal world this could even be incorporated into F Michonneau's foghorn package ...) It's probably been suggested already in this thread, but perhaps rhub would work for you as an alternative? On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 4:35 PM

[R-pkg-devel] winbuilder + CRAN incoming checkes offline for 30 hours from now

Dear all, unfortunately there is infrastructure work going on at the place where winbuilder and part of the CRAN incoming check infrastructure is hosted, hence the winbuilder service will be offline for roughly 30 hours from now (going down in one hour from now). Same is true for CRAN

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Winbuilder 'experimental' toolchain 4-5x slower than all other architectures

On 5 February 2020 at 08:39, Brian G. Peterson wrote: | We've noticed over the past week that Winbuilder/R-Hub's 'experimental' Are you refering to winbuilder, or to rhub? | Rtools4 toolchain images for Windows are approximately 4-5x slower than | all other containers to build and check

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Winbuilder 'experimental' toolchain 4-5x slower than all other architectures

On 05.02.2020 16:42, Uwe Ligges wrote: Then this is specific to your package, I meant the new one, not the one on CRAN which is also similarly quick (less than 10% difference). Best, Uwe Ligges see the overall timings for the whole CRAN check:

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Winbuilder 'experimental' toolchain 4-5x slower than all other architectures

Then this is specific to your package, see the overall timings for the whole CRAN check: https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_timings.html which is 2379156 sec for old and 2516120 sec for the new toolchain, i.e. roughly a 6%. Given the machines runs with very different loads it could

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Winbuilder 'experimental' toolchain 4-5x slower than all other architectures

For every other architecture, Travis-CI and R-Hub take approximately 10-12 minutes to build and check PerformanceAnalytics. On the Windows Rtools4 experimental toolchain, the build/check on Winbuilder and R-Hub take over an hour, sometimes as much as an hour and a half. Non-trivial example

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Winbuilder 'experimental' toolchain 4-5x slower than all other architectures

Can you please show some numbers? Thanks, Gabor On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 2:40 PM Brian G. Peterson wrote: > > We've noticed over the past week that Winbuilder/R-Hub's 'experimental' > Rtools4 toolchain images for Windows are approximately 4-5x slower than > all other containers to build and check

[R-pkg-devel] Winbuilder 'experimental' toolchain 4-5x slower than all other architectures

We've noticed over the past week that Winbuilder/R-Hub's 'experimental' Rtools4 toolchain images for Windows are approximately 4-5x slower than all other containers to build and check several packages we maintain. This affects everything, including example timings, where this architecture is the

Re: [R-pkg-devel] winbuilder fails for package depending on rJava

Hi all, Confirming that I'm having issues building a package that depends on rJava (dialrjars: https://cran.r-project.org/package=dialrjars) with winbuilder so I can't submit updates to CRAN. The winbuilder error from my original post that Kevin linked to below is: ``` * installing *source*

Re: [R-pkg-devel] winbuilder fails for package depending on rJava

On 10/30/19 3:46 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 29/10/2019 7:23 p.m., David Winsemius wrote: On 10/29/19 2:12 PM, Jeff Newmiller wrote: Once again, you can color me mystified. Are you reading logs not referred to in this email thread? Hi Jeff; I suppose am reading else. I ran:

Re: [R-pkg-devel] winbuilder fails for package depending on rJava

I was replying to the OP at https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-package-devel/2019q4/004539.html. This indeed pertains to reverse dependencies of rJava not passing checks on Windows. I have reached out to Uwe and will report back if I hear back. Thanks for the lively discussion :) On Wed, Oct 30,

Re: [R-pkg-devel] winbuilder fails for package depending on rJava

On 29/10/2019 7:23 p.m., David Winsemius wrote: On 10/29/19 2:12 PM, Jeff Newmiller wrote: Once again, you can color me mystified. Are you reading logs not referred to in this email thread? Hi Jeff; I suppose am reading else. I ran: maintainer("rJava") ... and the result was Simon

Re: [R-pkg-devel] winbuilder fails for package depending on rJava

My understanding is that the failure of rJava in the winbuilder server is likely to be a system configuration error specific to that server, and is a sysadmin issue rather than a package maintainer issue. But the sysadmin may know different. On October 29, 2019 4:23:24 PM PDT, David Winsemius

Re: [R-pkg-devel] winbuilder fails for package depending on rJava

On 10/29/19 2:12 PM, Jeff Newmiller wrote: Once again, you can color me mystified. Are you reading logs not referred to in this email thread? Hi Jeff; I suppose am reading else. I ran: maintainer("rJava") ... and the result was Simon Urbanek's name (which wasn't surprising to me), and

Re: [R-pkg-devel] winbuilder fails for package depending on rJava

Once again, you can color me mystified. Are you reading logs not referred to in this email thread? On October 29, 2019 12:28:59 PM PDT, David Winsemius wrote: > >On 10/29/19 12:22 PM, Jeff Newmiller wrote: >> I suspect David did not read the subject line. This is about >winbuilder [1]. I don't

Re: [R-pkg-devel] winbuilder fails for package depending on rJava

On 10/29/19 12:22 PM, Jeff Newmiller wrote: > I suspect David did not read the subject line. This is about winbuilder [1]. > I don't know who runs that service (Uwe?), but this sounds like they need to > investigate. Correct on the first point, but when I go to that page it says: Pleasedo

Re: [R-pkg-devel] winbuilder fails for package depending on rJava

I suspect David did not read the subject line. This is about winbuilder [1]. I don't know who runs that service (Uwe?), but this sounds like they need to investigate. [1] https://win-builder.r-project.org/ On October 29, 2019 9:28:23 AM PDT, David Winsemius wrote: > >On 10/29/19 4:48 AM,

Re: [R-pkg-devel] winbuilder fails for package depending on rJava

On 10/29/19 4:48 AM, Kevin Kuo wrote: Seems like all rev deps of rJava are failing Windows checks with the same error. Might be a Java architecture mismatch issue? Copied from the rJava GitHub page: == Bug reports Please userJava GitHub issues page

Re: [R-pkg-devel] winbuilder fails for package depending on rJava

Seems like all rev deps of rJava are failing Windows checks with the same error. Might be a Java architecture mismatch issue? [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list

[R-pkg-devel] WinBuilder Debian: GnuTLS recv error

Hi, I tried to use curl in examples and get the following error: GnuTLS recv error (-110): The TLS connection was non-properly terminated. Can I solve this without dontrun? Below code of example and traceback: > # detect encoding of the web pages content > if (require("curl")) { + fetch_url

[R-pkg-devel] winbuilder fails for package depending on rJava

Hi all, I'm trying to ready a package update for CRAN, but it's failing 32 bit Windows checks because of rJava: ``` * installing *source* package 'dialrjars' ... ** using staged installation ** R ** inst ** byte-compile and prepare package for lazy loading ** help *** installing help indices **

Re: [R-pkg-devel] WInbuilder and rHub updating

Thanks for the info. No special requests. Just no point in sending in a test until the package gets there. -Roy > On May 21, 2019, at 4:47 AM, Uwe Ligges > wrote: > > For winbuilder and general incoming check services: > > New packages on CRAN should be directly available for incoming

Re: [R-pkg-devel] WInbuilder and rHub updating

For winbuilder and general incoming check services: New packages on CRAN should be directly available for incoming checks, perhaps with some short technical delays of less than one hour. For winbuilder on demand checks, there may be a lag of 2 days. Requests may be considered. Best, Uwe

Re: [R-pkg-devel] WInbuilder and rHub updating

." > "From those who have been given much, much will be expected" > "the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice" -MLK Jr. > > > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federa

[R-pkg-devel] WInbuilder and rHub updating

--- Begin Message --- HI All: I have a package I am developing that depends on a package that was just accepted and appears on CRAN. Do Winbuilder and rHub update daily, or if not, what is the usual lag for new packages to appear on the test machines. Or may generally, is there a way to

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Winbuilder build error on r-release due to lazy loading

Please try again now. Best, Uwe Ligges On 04.09.2015 20:59, Benjamin Leutner wrote: To supplement my previous email: here is a link to the source bundle if that helps https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bleutner/RStoolbox/gh-pages/RStoolbox_0.1.0.tar.gz On 04.09.2015 10:34, Benjamin Leutner