Thanks a lot!
Kind regards,
Klaus Schliep
On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 9:43 PM Uwe Ligges
wrote:
> Indeed,
>
>
> * checking re-building of vignette outputs ... [13m] OK
>
> Please reduce the vignette build timings by using
> - small toy data only
> - few iterations
> - or by providing
Indeed,
* checking re-building of vignette outputs ... [13m] OK
Please reduce the vignette build timings by using
- small toy data only
- few iterations
- or by providing precomputed results for the most lengthy parts.
Otherwise we cannot afford checking the vignette regularly on CRAN.
On Sun, 22 Jan 2023 19:51:30 +0100
Klaus Schliep wrote:
> package phangorn_2.11.0.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks
> automatically, please see the following pre-tests:
Is this the whole e-mail? There may be a list of problems at the end of
the message, right after the signature ("Best
Long build time for vignettes?
On January 22, 2023 10:51:30 AM PST, Klaus Schliep
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
>I try to submit a new version of the package phangorn and got the mail back:
>
>"Dear maintainer,
>
>package phangorn_2.11.0.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks
>automatically, please
Seems pretty mysterious to me! (No cryptic NOTEs anywhere in the
logs, other than the inevitable "Note_to_CRAN_maintainers")
I will be curious to see if anyone else finds something, but my guess
is a hiccup on the CRAN end (i.e., you'll end up sending e-mail to the
CRAN maintainers to
