Did you check on https://itsalocke.com/cransays/articles/dashboard? If it is a
first time submission, there is a code review and that can take some time.
-Roy
> On Feb 3, 2020, at 3:56 PM, Marcelo Araya Salas wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> I submitted a new package to CRAN a couple of weeks ago. Doe
Hi all
I submitted a new package to CRAN a couple of weeks ago. Does anyone know
how long does it take for the package to be processed? New package versions
are usually processed in a few hours so that's why I am wondering if
everything is fine.
thanks
Marcelo
[[alternative HTML version
On 3 February 2020 at 23:58, Ivan Krylov wrote:
| On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 13:30:11 -0600
| Spencer Graves wrote:
|
| > logo.jpg <- paste(R.home(), "doc", "html", "logo.jpg", sep
| > = .Platform$file.sep)
|
| I wonder whether file.path(R.home('doc'), 'html', 'logo.jpg') would be
| more portable. Ar
I echo this. Relying on something undocumented and platform-specific, like the
location of a random installation file, is just asking for problems. Instead,
make a small image of your own and distribute it with your package.
-Original Message-
From: R-package-devel On Behalf Of Ben
Bol
On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 13:30:11 -0600
Spencer Graves wrote:
> logo.jpg <- paste(R.home(), "doc", "html", "logo.jpg", sep
> = .Platform$file.sep)
I wonder whether file.path(R.home('doc'), 'html', 'logo.jpg') would be
more portable. Are there R installations built without the HTML docs?
--
Best reg
El lun., 3 feb. 2020 20:30, Spencer Graves <
spencer.gra...@effectivedefense.org> escribió:
>Thanks to Iñaki Ucar for identifying a second error that
> explained why I still got an error after wrapping one in "try".
>
>
>That still leaves a question of how to find a file like
> "lo
On 4/02/20 3:03 am, profjohn wrote:
While there are huge benefits to upgrading, there is pain. It's that
pain that keeps people on OS versions that are older but still in the
LTS [1] period.
Fortune nomination!
cheers,
Rolf
[1] Long Term Support
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Departmen
Maybe include your own version of logo.jpg in inst/ ?
On 2020-02-03 2:30 p.m., Spencer Graves wrote:
> Thanks to Iñaki Ucar for identifying a second error that explained
> why I still got an error after wrapping one in "try".
>
>
> That still leaves a question of how to find a fi
Thanks to Iñaki Ucar for identifying a second error that
explained why I still got an error after wrapping one in "try".
That still leaves a question of how to find a file like
"logo.jpg" in a platform independant way.
The following had worked for several years and now bro
On 3 February 2020 at 09:03, profjohn wrote:
| While there are huge benefits to upgrading, there is pain. It's that
We have a dedicated mailing list r-sig-debian for use of R on operating
systems that are .deb based. It is low volume, and has high signal / noise.
So I would cordially invite ever
>
> While there are huge benefits to upgrading, there is pain. It's that
> pain that keeps people on OS versions that are older but still in the
> LTS period.
More or less what I was going to say.
>
> Best, JN
>
>
> On 2/3/20 12:27 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>>
>> On 2 February 2020 at
Looks like Spencer's issue solved in another post.
And this isn't a criticism of Dirk's contribution, just a partial
explanation of some of the noise that occurs.
I use Linux Mint -- family members are still recovering from Win XP.
But LM 18.x is based on Ubuntu 16.04. So I found recently that th
On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 at 03:16, Spencer Graves
wrote:
>
> Hello, All:
>
>
>devtools::check_rhub failed to trap an error wrapped in "try",
> per the email below. This came from running
> devtools::check_rhub(Ecfun_dir), where Ecfun_dir = the path to a copy of
> "https://github.com/sbgraves237
13 matches
Mail list logo
