Re: [R-pkg-devel] Note about No repository set, so cyclic dependency check skipped

2015-07-20 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel

On 20 July 2015 at 08:53, Martyn Plummer wrote:
| On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 07:36 +0200, Antonio José Saez Castillo wrote:
|  When checking a package I am getting
|  
|  * checking package dependencies ... NOTE
| No repository set, so cyclic dependency check skipped
|  
|  This is an old source of discussion and I've found a lot of suggestions,
|  but none of them work for me (.Rprofile and/or Rprofile.site edition and
|  so). What is more worrying is that I'm also getting this note when I check
|  in R-devel on win-builder site (win-builder.r-project.org). There is
|  another similar topic in relation to that (
|  
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/No-repository-set-so-cyclic-dependency-check-skipped-td4684184.html),
|  but I don't know if it is the same problem.
|  
|  How can I avoid this note?
| 
| This is covered in the Writing R Extensions manual (page 32), but if you
| tried creating a .Rprofile file and it didn't work then the problem
| might be that it is in the wrong place. On my Windows 7 desktop, R opens
| in my Documents folder rather than my home directory, so my .Rprofile
| folder has to go into Documents.

If I recall correctly, setting the environment variable HOME (which is not
standard under Window) allows you to control that.  Files such as ~/.Rprofile
will then be searched in the directory pointed to by the value assigned to
HOME.

Dirk

-- 
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel


Re: [R-pkg-devel] Note about No repository set, so cyclic dependency check skipped

2015-07-20 Thread Martyn Plummer
On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 07:36 +0200, Antonio José Saez Castillo wrote:
 When checking a package I am getting
 
 * checking package dependencies ... NOTE
No repository set, so cyclic dependency check skipped
 
 This is an old source of discussion and I've found a lot of suggestions,
 but none of them work for me (.Rprofile and/or Rprofile.site edition and
 so). What is more worrying is that I'm also getting this note when I check
 in R-devel on win-builder site (win-builder.r-project.org). There is
 another similar topic in relation to that (
 http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/No-repository-set-so-cyclic-dependency-check-skipped-td4684184.html),
 but I don't know if it is the same problem.
 
 How can I avoid this note?

This is covered in the Writing R Extensions manual (page 32), but if you
tried creating a .Rprofile file and it didn't work then the problem
might be that it is in the wrong place. On my Windows 7 desktop, R opens
in my Documents folder rather than my home directory, so my .Rprofile
folder has to go into Documents.

Martyn

 
 
 
 
 *Dr. Antonio José Sáez-Castillo*Department of Statistics and
 Operational Research
 Escuela Politécnica Superior de Linares
 UNIVERSIDAD DE JAÉN
 C/ Alfonso X el Sabio, 28
 23700 Linares (Jaén)
 Teléfono: +34 953 64 85 78
 e-mail: ajs...@ujaen.es
  https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Antonio_Saez-Castillo
 http://twitter.com/ajsaezUJA
 
   [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
 
 __
 R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
 https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

---
This message and its attachments are strictly confidenti...{{dropped:8}}

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel


[R-pkg-devel] recreating CRAN Testing environment

2015-07-20 Thread Jonathan Callahan
I am (hopefully) at the end of a series of back-and-forth submissions of a
package to the CRAN upload site.

I have done my best to test things by:

   - using devtools
   - running R CMD check --as-cran on the command line
   - checking my package on OSX, win-builder.R and various 32 and 64 bit
   linux virtual machines at DigitalOcean

But I have never managed to recreate all of the notes and warning messages
that the CRAN testing comes up with.

In an effort to save time and effort on both ends, can anyone advise on
what I need to do to generate ALL the warning messages that the CRAN
testing will find?



-- 
Jonathan Callahan, PhD
Mazama Science
206-708-5028
mazamascience.com

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel


Re: [R-pkg-devel] recreating CRAN Testing environment

2015-07-20 Thread Ben Bolker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 15-07-20 01:50 PM, Jonathan Callahan wrote:
 I am (hopefully) at the end of a series of back-and-forth
 submissions of a package to the CRAN upload site.
 
 I have done my best to test things by:
 
 - using devtools - running R CMD check --as-cran on the command
 line - checking my package on OSX, win-builder.R and various 32 and
 64 bit linux virtual machines at DigitalOcean
 
 But I have never managed to recreate all of the notes and warning
 messages that the CRAN testing comes up with.
 
 In an effort to save time and effort on both ends, can anyone
 advise on what I need to do to generate ALL the warning messages
 that the CRAN testing will find?

   The most important thing that you haven't explicitly mentioned is
to test on the most recent development version of R (check out via
Subversion/configure/make/make install from scratch).  Can you adjust
your DigitalOcean settings accordingly?

  Ben Bolker


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVrTcSAAoJEOCV5YRblxUHNqUIAKMpuDZ5viQSBlyXpIqjtjEW
Na6LhC5O/XcjmmrZHDftXAat2gTrRM0OJAn0cfzSZttdcJKowbMYfJzDWe/5oBCE
QRQ0zwxbJY1cFHFyYR6r1zCe4ah4SzoGt+FmBYjtAKefvjm12tfQubhQlxPxZ1kV
XFIfYTWHmHWNGlhZuokPE/GtdXK5/4MNF/32HxseNBRzc2SWqP3i6VKPnbN7LFgl
xrjXsHQdqU3UaY37D44mInl+qm5y5reRSUi6NO0SrSh2WcVWTnqZ3HsUkFPND5tM
NyzrfhtGN2wISsFq1J+dC87ajyeh6D8LTYBiokUnWQFOj8tPi1Zhff0LuTJi7Vc=
=gytX
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel


Re: [R-pkg-devel] recreating CRAN Testing environment

2015-07-20 Thread Avraham Adler
Even if you don't use Windows, it pays to submit your package to the
Winbuilder test of buth R-release and R-devel. The error reports, if any,
are often not-OS dependant and will serve as a good gaage as to how the
real CRAN will respond.

Avi

On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Ben Bolker bbol...@gmail.com wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 On 15-07-20 01:50 PM, Jonathan Callahan wrote:
  I am (hopefully) at the end of a series of back-and-forth
  submissions of a package to the CRAN upload site.
 
  I have done my best to test things by:
 
  - using devtools - running R CMD check --as-cran on the command
  line - checking my package on OSX, win-builder.R and various 32 and
  64 bit linux virtual machines at DigitalOcean
 
  But I have never managed to recreate all of the notes and warning
  messages that the CRAN testing comes up with.
 
  In an effort to save time and effort on both ends, can anyone
  advise on what I need to do to generate ALL the warning messages
  that the CRAN testing will find?

The most important thing that you haven't explicitly mentioned is
 to test on the most recent development version of R (check out via
 Subversion/configure/make/make install from scratch).  Can you adjust
 your DigitalOcean settings accordingly?

   Ben Bolker


 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVrTcSAAoJEOCV5YRblxUHNqUIAKMpuDZ5viQSBlyXpIqjtjEW
 Na6LhC5O/XcjmmrZHDftXAat2gTrRM0OJAn0cfzSZttdcJKowbMYfJzDWe/5oBCE
 QRQ0zwxbJY1cFHFyYR6r1zCe4ah4SzoGt+FmBYjtAKefvjm12tfQubhQlxPxZ1kV
 XFIfYTWHmHWNGlhZuokPE/GtdXK5/4MNF/32HxseNBRzc2SWqP3i6VKPnbN7LFgl
 xrjXsHQdqU3UaY37D44mInl+qm5y5reRSUi6NO0SrSh2WcVWTnqZ3HsUkFPND5tM
 NyzrfhtGN2wISsFq1J+dC87ajyeh6D8LTYBiokUnWQFOj8tPi1Zhff0LuTJi7Vc=
 =gytX
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-

 __
 R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
 https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel


[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel


Re: [R-pkg-devel] recreating CRAN Testing environment

2015-07-20 Thread Gábor Csárdi
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Ben Bolker bbol...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
The most important thing that you haven't explicitly mentioned is
 to test on the most recent development version of R (check out via
 Subversion/configure/make/make install from scratch).  Can you adjust
 your DigitalOcean settings accordingly?

If you want an easy way to build and check your package with R-devel,
and your package is on GitHub, consider using
https://github.com/metacran/r-builder

By default it builds and checks your package with R-oldrel, R-release
and R-devel, on Travis CI.

win-builder.r-project.org is another possibility, somewhat complementary.

Disclaimer: r-builder is my project, and I have no financial interests in it.

Best,
Gabor

   Ben Bolker

[...]

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel


Re: [R-pkg-devel] recreating CRAN Testing environment

2015-07-20 Thread Jonathan Callahan
Thanks to all so far for excellent suggestions!

On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Gábor Csárdi csardi.ga...@gmail.com
wrote:

 On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Ben Bolker bbol...@gmail.com wrote:
 [...]
 The most important thing that you haven't explicitly mentioned is
  to test on the most recent development version of R (check out via
  Subversion/configure/make/make install from scratch).  Can you adjust
  your DigitalOcean settings accordingly?

 If you want an easy way to build and check your package with R-devel,
 and your package is on GitHub, consider using
 https://github.com/metacran/r-builder

 By default it builds and checks your package with R-oldrel, R-release
 and R-devel, on Travis CI.

 win-builder.r-project.org is another possibility, somewhat complementary.

 Disclaimer: r-builder is my project, and I have no financial interests in
 it.

 Best,
 Gabor

Ben Bolker

 [...]

 __
 R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
 https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel




-- 
Jonathan Callahan, PhD
Mazama Science
206-708-5028
mazamascience.com

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel


Re: [R-pkg-devel] Setting up R-devel in Linux Mint 17.1 64-bit

2015-07-20 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel

On 20 July 2015 at 18:05, MAURICIO ZAMBRANO BIGIARINI wrote:
| Dear list,
| 
| I'm trying to set up the development version of R (R-devel ) for
| testing some packages before submitting them to CRAN. I'm using Linux
| Mint 17.1 64-bit, which is an Ubuntu-based distro.
| 
| I followed the advice of Dirk on
| https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-debian/2012-August/001935.html
| 
| 
| Everything seems to run fine until .configure:
| 
| R is now configured for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
| 
|   Source directory:  .
|   Installation directory:/usr/local/lib/R-devel
| 
|   C compiler:ccache gcc -std=gnu99  -g -O2
|   Fortran 77 compiler:   gfortran  -g -O2
| 
|   C++ compiler:  ccache g++  -g -O2
|   C++11 compiler:ccache g++  -std=c++11 -g -O2
|   Fortran 90/95 compiler:gfortran -g -O2
|   Obj-C compiler:
| 
|   Interfaces supported:  X11, tcltk
|   External libraries:readline, BLAS(generic), LAPACK(generic), curl
|   Additional capabilities:   PNG, JPEG, TIFF, NLS, cairo, ICU
|   Options enabled:   shared R library, R profiling
| 
|   Capabilities skipped:
|   Options not enabled:   shared BLAS, memory profiling
| 
|   Recommended packages:  no

Looks good but ...
| 
| 
| However, when running make, I got an error saying:
| 
| /usr/bin/ld: ../appl/dchdc.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against
| `.rodata' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with
| -fPIC
| 
| 
| I would highly appreciate any advice on how to solve this issue (or
| what should I  recompile with -fPIC and how).

... naybe your R was built without shared library support?  The binaries
resulting from my configuration (ie the Debian or Ubuntu packages obtained
either from the distro themselves or the CRAN mirrors) have 'pic' set:

edd@max:~$ grep -i pic /etc/R/Makeconf 
CPICFLAGS = -fpic
CXXPICFLAGS = -fpic
CXX1XPICFLAGS = -fpic
DYLIB_LDFLAGS = -shared -fopenmp# $(CFLAGS) $(CPICFLAGS)
FCPICFLAGS = -fpic
FPICFLAGS = -fpic
SHLIB_LDFLAGS = -shared# $(CFLAGS) $(CPICFLAGS)
## We want to ensure libR is picked up from $(R_HOME)/lib
ALL_CFLAGS = $(R_XTRA_CFLAGS) $(PKG_CFLAGS) $(CPICFLAGS) $(SHLIB_CFLAGS) 
$(CFLAGS)
ALL_CXXFLAGS = $(R_XTRA_CXXFLAGS) $(PKG_CXXFLAGS) $(CXXPICFLAGS) 
$(SHLIB_CXXFLAGS) $(CXXFLAGS)
ALL_OBJCFLAGS = $(PKG_OBJCFLAGS) $(CPICFLAGS) $(SHLIB_CFLAGS) $(OBJCFLAGS)
ALL_OBJCXXFLAGS = $(PKG_OBJCXXFLAGS) $(CXXPICFLAGS) $(SHLIB_CXXFLAGS) 
$(OBJCXXFLAGS)
ALL_FFLAGS = $(R_XTRA_FFLAGS) $(PKG_FFLAGS) $(FPICFLAGS) $(SHLIB_FFLAGS) 
$(FFLAGS)
$(FC) $(PKG_FCFLAGS) $(FCPICFLAGS) $(FCFLAGS) -c  $ -o $@
$(FC) $(PKG_FCFLAGS) $(FCPICFLAGS) $(FCFLAGS) -c  $ -o $@
edd@max:~$

Here /etc/R/Makefonf is just a convenient link to $(R_HOME)/etc/Makeconf.

Dirk


-- 
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel


Re: [R-pkg-devel] Setting up R-devel in Linux Mint 17.1 64-bit

2015-07-20 Thread MAURICIO ZAMBRANO BIGIARINI
=
When the pupil is ready, the master arrives.
(Zen proverb)
=
Linux user #454569 -- Linux Mint user


On 20 July 2015 at 18:35, Dirk Eddelbuettel e...@debian.org wrote:

 On 20 July 2015 at 18:05, MAURICIO ZAMBRANO BIGIARINI wrote:
 | Dear list,
 |
 | I'm trying to set up the development version of R (R-devel ) for
 | testing some packages before submitting them to CRAN. I'm using Linux
 | Mint 17.1 64-bit, which is an Ubuntu-based distro.
 |
 | I followed the advice of Dirk on
 | https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-debian/2012-August/001935.html
 |
 |
 | Everything seems to run fine until .configure:
 |
 | R is now configured for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
 |
 |   Source directory:  .
 |   Installation directory:/usr/local/lib/R-devel
 |
 |   C compiler:ccache gcc -std=gnu99  -g -O2
 |   Fortran 77 compiler:   gfortran  -g -O2
 |
 |   C++ compiler:  ccache g++  -g -O2
 |   C++11 compiler:ccache g++  -std=c++11 -g -O2
 |   Fortran 90/95 compiler:gfortran -g -O2
 |   Obj-C compiler:
 |
 |   Interfaces supported:  X11, tcltk
 |   External libraries:readline, BLAS(generic), LAPACK(generic), curl
 |   Additional capabilities:   PNG, JPEG, TIFF, NLS, cairo, ICU
 |   Options enabled:   shared R library, R profiling
 |
 |   Capabilities skipped:
 |   Options not enabled:   shared BLAS, memory profiling
 |
 |   Recommended packages:  no

 Looks good but ...
 |
 |
 | However, when running make, I got an error saying:
 |
 | /usr/bin/ld: ../appl/dchdc.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against
 | `.rodata' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with
 | -fPIC
 |
 |
 | I would highly appreciate any advice on how to solve this issue (or
 | what should I  recompile with -fPIC and how).

 ... naybe your R was built without shared library support?  The binaries
 resulting from my configuration (ie the Debian or Ubuntu packages obtained
 either from the distro themselves or the CRAN mirrors) have 'pic' set:

 edd@max:~$ grep -i pic /etc/R/Makeconf
 CPICFLAGS = -fpic
 CXXPICFLAGS = -fpic
 CXX1XPICFLAGS = -fpic
 DYLIB_LDFLAGS = -shared -fopenmp# $(CFLAGS) $(CPICFLAGS)
 FCPICFLAGS = -fpic
 FPICFLAGS = -fpic
 SHLIB_LDFLAGS = -shared# $(CFLAGS) $(CPICFLAGS)
 ## We want to ensure libR is picked up from $(R_HOME)/lib
 ALL_CFLAGS = $(R_XTRA_CFLAGS) $(PKG_CFLAGS) $(CPICFLAGS) $(SHLIB_CFLAGS) 
 $(CFLAGS)
 ALL_CXXFLAGS = $(R_XTRA_CXXFLAGS) $(PKG_CXXFLAGS) $(CXXPICFLAGS) 
 $(SHLIB_CXXFLAGS) $(CXXFLAGS)
 ALL_OBJCFLAGS = $(PKG_OBJCFLAGS) $(CPICFLAGS) $(SHLIB_CFLAGS) $(OBJCFLAGS)
 ALL_OBJCXXFLAGS = $(PKG_OBJCXXFLAGS) $(CXXPICFLAGS) $(SHLIB_CXXFLAGS) 
 $(OBJCXXFLAGS)
 ALL_FFLAGS = $(R_XTRA_FFLAGS) $(PKG_FFLAGS) $(FPICFLAGS) $(SHLIB_FFLAGS) 
 $(FFLAGS)
 $(FC) $(PKG_FCFLAGS) $(FCPICFLAGS) $(FCFLAGS) -c  $ -o $@
 $(FC) $(PKG_FCFLAGS) $(FCPICFLAGS) $(FCFLAGS) -c  $ -o $@
 edd@max:~$

 Here /etc/R/Makefonf is just a convenient link to $(R_HOME)/etc/Makeconf.

 Dirk


Thank you very much Dirk, but I forgot to mention that this is my very
first time trying to set up R-devel.


In my ~/SVN/R-devel/trunk/Makeconf file I currently don't have the
first two lines you mentioned:

 CPICFLAGS = -fpic
 CXXPICFLAGS = -fpic

and instead of

SHLIB_LDFLAGS = -shared# $(CFLAGS) $(CPICFLAGS)

I have

DYLIB_LDFLAGS = -shared -fopenmp# $(DYLIBS_LTO)

how can I be sure that I I enabled the shared library support ?


Mauricio

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel


Re: [R-pkg-devel] Setting up R-devel in Linux Mint 17.1 64-bit

2015-07-20 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel

On 20 July 2015 at 18:56, MAURICIO ZAMBRANO BIGIARINI wrote:
| how can I be sure that I I enabled the shared library support ?

edd@max:~/svn/r-devel$ ./configure --help | grep enable-R-sh
  --enable-R-shlibbuild the shared/dynamic library 'libR' [no]
edd@max:~/svn/r-devel$

Make sure you set --enable-R-shlib.

It is in the script which you linked to in your previous email.

Dirk

-- 
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel


Re: [R-pkg-devel] Setting up R-devel in Linux Mint 17.1 64-bit

2015-07-20 Thread MAURICIO ZAMBRANO BIGIARINI
On 20 July 2015 at 20:29, peter dalgaard pda...@gmail.com wrote:
 Oi!

 Could you guys move to r-devel? This has nothing to do with _package_ 
 development.

Thanks for the advice. I was not sure about the list I should have
submitted this message, but looking at
http://www.r-project.org/mail.html:

R-package-devel
is to get help about package development in R,...
If you are having problems developing a package or passing R CMD
check, this is the place to ask!


R-devel:
This list is intended for questions and discussion about code
development in R.  ...
The list is also for proposals of new functionality for R, and
pre-testing of new versions. It is meant particularly for those who
maintain an active position in the development of R.


and as my original intend was to passing R CMD check--as-cran using
the development version of R, I chose r-package-devel.


I'll create a shorten version of this message in r-devel (not sure if
this is the right way of moving a message from one mailing list to
another).

Mauricio


 -Peter D

 On 21 Jul 2015, at 00:49 , MAURICIO ZAMBRANO BIGIARINI 
 mauricio.zambr...@ufrontera.cl wrote:

 -- Forwarded message --
 From: Dirk Eddelbuettel e...@debian.org
 Date: 20 July 2015 at 19:21
 Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Setting up R-devel in Linux Mint 17.1 64-bit
 To: MAURICIO ZAMBRANO BIGIARINI mauricio.zambr...@ufrontera.cl
 Cc: Dirk Eddelbuettel e...@debian.org, r-package-devel@r-project.org



 On 20 July 2015 at 18:56, MAURICIO ZAMBRANO BIGIARINI wrote:
 | how can I be sure that I I enabled the shared library support ?

 edd@max:~/svn/r-devel$ ./configure --help | grep enable-R-sh
  --enable-R-shlibbuild the shared/dynamic library 'libR' [no]
 edd@max:~/svn/r-devel$

 Make sure you set --enable-R-shlib.

 It is in the script which you linked to in your previous email.


 I thought I did it already when running configure:

 ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/lib/R-devel --enable-R-shlib
 --with-blas --with-lapack --with-readline
 --without-recommended-packages



 I just tried to run again your script (mentioned in my previous
 e-mail) from scratch and I'm still getting an error:

 R is now configured for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

  Source directory:  .
  Installation directory:/usr/local/lib/R-devel

  C compiler:ccache gcc  -ggdb -pipe -std=gnu99 -Wall 
 -pedantic
  Fortran 77 compiler:   ccache gfortran  -g -O2

  C++ compiler:  ccache g++  -ggdb -pipe -Wall -pedantic
  C++11 compiler:ccache g++  -std=c++11 -ggdb -pipe -Wall 
 -pedantic
  Fortran 90/95 compiler:ccache gfortran -g -O2
  Obj-C compiler:

  Interfaces supported:  X11, tcltk
  External libraries:readline, BLAS(generic), LAPACK(generic), curl
  Additional capabilities:   PNG, JPEG, TIFF, NLS, cairo, ICU
  Options enabled:   shared R library, R profiling

  Capabilities skipped:
  Options not enabled:   shared BLAS, memory profiling

  Recommended packages:  no

 make[1]: Entering directory `/home/hzambran/SVN/R-devel/trunk/doc/manual'
 make[1]: Nothing to be done for `front-matter'.
 make[1]: Nothing to be done for `html-non-svn'.
 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/hzambran/SVN/R-devel/trunk/doc/manual'
 SVN-REVISION is unchanged
 make[1]: Entering directory `/home/hzambran/SVN/R-devel/trunk/m4'
 make[1]: Nothing to be done for `R'.
 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/hzambran/SVN/R-devel/trunk/m4'
 make[1]: Entering directory `/home/hzambran/SVN/R-devel/trunk/tools'
 make[1]: Nothing to be done for `R'.
 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/hzambran/SVN/R-devel/trunk/tools'
 make[1]: Entering directory `/home/hzambran/SVN/R-devel/trunk/doc'
 make[2]: Entering directory `/home/hzambran/SVN/R-devel/trunk/doc/html'
 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/hzambran/SVN/R-devel/trunk/doc/html'
 make[2]: Entering directory `/home/hzambran/SVN/R-devel/trunk/doc/manual'
 make[2]: Nothing to be done for `R'.
 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/hzambran/SVN/R-devel/trunk/doc/manual'
 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/hzambran/SVN/R-devel/trunk/doc'
 make[1]: Entering directory `/home/hzambran/SVN/R-devel/trunk/etc'
 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/hzambran/SVN/R-devel/trunk/etc'
 make[1]: Entering directory `/home/hzambran/SVN/R-devel/trunk/share'
 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/hzambran/SVN/R-devel/trunk/share'
 make[1]: Entering directory `/home/hzambran/SVN/R-devel/trunk/src'
 make[2]: Entering directory `/home/hzambran/SVN/R-devel/trunk/src/scripts'
 creating src/scripts/R.fe
 make[3]: Entering directory `/home/hzambran/SVN/R-devel/trunk/src/scripts'
 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/hzambran/SVN/R-devel/trunk/src/scripts'
 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/hzambran/SVN/R-devel/trunk/src/scripts'
 make[2]: Entering directory `/home/hzambran/SVN/R-devel/trunk/src/include'
 config.status: creating src/include/config.h
 config.status: src/include/config.h is unchanged
 Rmath.h is unchanged
 make[3]: Entering