Thanks, Duncan and Uwe, for the answers!
I'll resubmit it as soon as possible.
Best regards,
Tiago Olivoto
--
M.Sc. Tiago Olivoto
Doutorando em Agronomia
Departamento de Fitotecnia
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Av. Roraima, 1000, Camobi
Santa Maria, RS, 97105-340
E-mail: tiagooliv...@gmail.c
On 15.12.2019 23:39, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 15/12/2019 4:57 p.m., Tiago Olivoto wrote:
Thank you for the response.
As far I remember, I've responded that message by following the link
and selecting "I have read the CRAN policies and would like to submit
this package to CRAN" and " I have
On 15/12/2019 4:57 p.m., Tiago Olivoto wrote:
Thank you for the response.
As far I remember, I've responded that message by following the link and selecting "I have read the CRAN
policies and would like to submit this package to CRAN" and " I have checked the submission using R
CMD check --as-c
Thank you for the response.
As far I remember, I've responded that message by following the link and
selecting "I have read the CRAN policies and would like to submit this package
to CRAN" and " I have checked the submission using R CMD check --as-cran and a
current version of r-devel, as mandat
Remove the "inst" directory and don't use "--no-build-vignettes" in your
build command.
Iñaki
On Sun, 15 Dec 2019 at 21:45, Charith Karunarathna <
charith_karunarat...@sfu.ca> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
>
> I wonder how to address the following NOTE that I am getting from the
> win-builder chec
Hi Everyone,
I wonder how to address the following NOTE that I am getting from the
win-builder check.
"
* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
Maintainer: 'Charith Karunarathna '
Package has a VignetteBuilder field but no prebuilt vignette index.
"
I am including a static PDF v
On 15/12/2019 1:29 p.m., Tiago Olivoto wrote:
Dear all,
I've submitted my package 'metan' to CRAN for the first time a few weeks ago
and received some suggestions to improve the code. After fixing some bugs,
I've resubmitted it on November 25, but I still don't have any response and
the package
Dear all,
I've submitted my package 'metan' to CRAN for the first time a few weeks ago
and received some suggestions to improve the code. After fixing some bugs,
I've resubmitted it on November 25, but I still don't have any response and
the package was not found in incoming/ dir on CRAN cran ftp
On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 6:27 PM wrote:
> Thanks for this information, and it makes sense to me. Is there a preferred
> way to cache the data locally?
Personally I like making an R package out of the data and hosting it
in an "AdditionalRepository". This is quite easy with the help of the
drat p
The R.cache package on CRAN provides can be used for this purpose. It
works on all platforms. Per CRAN Policies, it will prompt the user
(in an interactive session) whether they wish to use a persistent
cache folder, or to fall back to temporary one. For example,
> path <- R.cache::getCachePath(
Hi Uwe,
Thanks for this information, and it makes sense to me. Is there a preferred
way to cache the data locally?
None of the ways that I can think to cache the data sound particularly good,
and I wonder if I'm missing something. The ideas that occur to me are:
1. Download them into the pac
Have you tried to write to CRAN@... and ask if thirs party software can
be installed on CRAN?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 11.12.2019 10:39, Serguei Sokol wrote:
Hi,
I have tried to submit my new package
https://github.com/sgsokol/r2sundials to CRAN but submission seems to be
dismissed.
The package
Ideally yoiu wpuld host the data elsewhere and submit a CRAN package
that allows users to easily get/merge/aggregate the data.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 12.12.2019 20:55, b...@denney.ws wrote:
Hello,
I have two questions about creating data packages for data that will be
updated and in total
13 matches
Mail list logo