One could take the position that the library and require functions were a
mistake to begin with and that all contributed packages should be accessed
using ::... or one could recognize that these functions are an expected
feature of R at this point and then it is not defensible to ban the
On 06/04/2020 11:25 a.m., Stefan Lenz IMBI wrote:
Yes, as I wrote earlier, I would like to imitate the behaviour of loading an R
package
juliaUsing("SomeJuliaPackage") # exports myJuliaFunction
myJuliaFunction()
like R:
library("MyRPackage") # exports myRFunction
myRFunction()
I
Hi,
following up on this.
Has anybody encountered this issue or could give some insights on it?
Is there anything I can do here, except avoiding using Matrix in the union
class?
Thanks
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
On 06/04/2020 10:59 a.m., Ben Bolker wrote:
Fair enough. I'm going to derail/repurpose this thread to ask a
couple of questions about attach().
I have often used with() for situations where I want to evaluate a
bunch of expressions with the elements of a parameter vector, e.g.
inside a
Yes, as I wrote earlier, I would like to imitate the behaviour of loading an R
package
juliaUsing("SomeJuliaPackage") # exports myJuliaFunction
myJuliaFunction()
like R:
library("MyRPackage") # exports myRFunction
myRFunction()
I could return an environment, such that the call becomes
My case is a little bit different from the use of global variables for data
described in the Stackoverflow post.
I import a data base which contains function names of Julia functions from a
Julia package.
This is analogous to loading a package in R.
The goal is to make it possible to call Julia
On 06/04/2020 10:49 a.m., Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 6 April 2020 at 08:38, Ben Bolker wrote:
| Just reply to the CRAN maintainers and explain this situation. It¨s
| slightly buried, but the e-mail you received does say:
|
| > If you are fairly certain the rejection is a false positive,
Fair enough. I'm going to derail/repurpose this thread to ask a
couple of questions about attach().
I have often used with() for situations where I want to evaluate a
bunch of expressions with the elements of a parameter vector, e.g.
inside a gradient function for deSolve::ode().
On 6 April 2020 at 08:38, Ben Bolker wrote:
| Just reply to the CRAN maintainers and explain this situation. It¨s
| slightly buried, but the e-mail you received does say:
|
| > If you are fairly certain the rejection is a false positive, please
reply-all to this
| > message and explain.
Just reply to the CRAN maintainers and explain this situation. It¨s
slightly buried, but the e-mail you received does say:
> If you are fairly certain the rejection is a false positive, please reply-all
> to this
> message and explain.
cheers
Ben Bolker
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 8:28 AM
Dear all,
I just submitted the new package "JuliaConnectoR" to CRAN.
(See https://github.com/stefan-m-lenz/JuliaConnectoR )
The submission does not pass the automatic checks because of two notes (see
below).
One note is simply that I am a new submitter.
The other note is because of the the use
11 matches
Mail list logo
