Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package submission rejected as it fails checks on Debian

2023-02-23 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 23/02/2023 1:11 p.m., Ben Bolker wrote: Not important (of course) but where does the 5000 kWh per tree number come from? Is that (dry weight) x (50% carbon per dry weight) / (carbon content of CO2 emissions per kWh) ?

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package submission rejected as it fails checks on Debian

2023-02-23 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 23/02/2023 1:11 p.m., Ben Bolker wrote: Not important (of course) but where does the 5000 kWh per tree number come from? Is that (dry weight) x (50% carbon per dry weight) / (carbon content of CO2 emissions per kWh) ? That's just made up, but it is close to the numbers here for dry

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package submission rejected as it fails checks on Debian

2023-02-23 Thread Ben Bolker
Not important (of course) but where does the 5000 kWh per tree number come from? Is that (dry weight) x (50% carbon per dry weight) / (carbon content of CO2 emissions per kWh) ? https://www.epa.gov/energy/greenhouse-gas-equivalencies-calculator#results If we say 200 watts x 15 minutes

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package submission rejected as it fails checks on Debian

2023-02-23 Thread Duncan Murdoch
Hi Martin. I think your calculations are way off. A one-tonne tree contains about 5000 kWh of energy. A typical computer server uses about 200 watts, and can process many jobs simultaneously on different cores, but let's say the whole server is dedicated to the Github action. Then it would

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package submission rejected as it fails checks on Debian

2023-02-23 Thread Martin Maechler
> Spencer Graves > on Tue, 21 Feb 2023 05:25:39 -0600 writes: > On 2/21/23 2:34 AM, Vasileios Nikolaidis wrote: >> Yes, with all this I can think where I may have messed up. So thanks for >> the help, at least it verified it is indeed an issue with the code. As >>