to
have real world examples. Small data and few iterations are typically
sufficient for tests.
It is also possible to run less important tests only conditionally if
some environment variable is set that you only define on your machine.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 22.11.2020 20:36, Dirk Eddelbuettel
+ API" you asked for, not about an
R package. R packages from BioC + CRAN should be availabe on CRAN, in
that case it is a problem in your package.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Best,
Kamil
On Sat, 14 Nov 2020 at 19:39, Gábor Csárdi wrote:
You probably import functions from shiny. Don't do t
Write to c...@r-project.org, explain how to install the third party
software (availability and names of Debian packages etc.) and the CRAN
team will decide whether the software will be isntalled on (a subset of)
CRAN machines.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 09.11.2020 19:24, Akshit Achara wrote:
Hey
You cannot use strong dependencies to packages that are not in standard
repositories such as CRAN or BioC.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 13.11.2020 09:10, Jason Luo wrote:
Hi,
I'm submitting a new package (https://github.com/Penncil/pda/) to CRAN. It
relies on some function (zerotrunc and hurdle
Next guess is that you need more, because you may have an object that
needs the flexmix, so likely something S4 related? I can take a closer look.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 11.11.2020 17:30, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
Uwe suggested you suggest flexmix, but I see below you already tried that.
I'd
You have to suggest flexmix.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 11.11.2020 14:44, Kevin R. Coombes wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to figure out how to fix warnings from two of the CRAN
machines on the submission of an update to a package. The only change to
my package was to add a "show" method to one
It will make them run.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 23.10.2020 23:52, Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal wrote:
Thanks. I had a feeling that was the case from looking at the queue. Does the
clearing make them run or do they need to be resubmitted?
-Roy
On Oct 23, 2020, at 2:43 PM, Uwe Ligges wrote
Generally by submission time, but there is a series of packages
unprocessed stuck in the queue, will clear that up shortly.
Best,
Uwe
On 23.10.2020 19:17, Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal via R-package-devel
wrote:
Just out of curiousity, how is pretest order determined? I have a package
t be
used under its own license conditions in that case.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 23.10.2020 14:25, Ege Rubak wrote:
Hi all,
My two cents are below Marc's summary here:
On Thu, 2020-10-22 at 20:33 -0400, Marc Schwartz wrote:
Right now, the interpretation, without further clarification from
C
Windows binaries may be delayed these days, but they are generated in a
bunch R-flavour-wise. They typical delay after a source package
publication should be less then 72 hours ideally.
Best,
Uwe
On 23.10.2020 14:05, Marc Schwartz wrote:
Hi All,
Just a quick note to indicate that one of the
with no Notes. Any suggestions for a fix that I can take?
The server reported a permament move to the other URL given above, hence
you simply need a trailinmg slash.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Thanks,
-Roy
**
"The contents of this message do not reflect any position of th
ave to check one architecture ...)
Do I interpret correctly that the advice is to address this problem,
bump the version number, and re-submit?
Yes, please.
Best,
Uwe
cheers
Ben Bolker
On 10/12/20 5:18 PM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Actually more than 23 minutes check time for a single pack
Indeed, in this case, the CRAN team will let is pass anyway.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 28.09.2020 18:41, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 28/09/2020 11:10 a.m., Yicheng Yang wrote:
Dear all,
I notice that there is a note from CRAN package check results for our
package as follows:
Version: 1.4.1
Check
Ideally send a note to Imion Urbanek, the Mac maintainer.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 25.09.2020 19:40, Kort, Eric wrote:
Good afternoon. Forgive me if this belongs on R-SIG-Mac.
I am the maintainer of the rtiff package. It has come to my attention that
binaries are not being successfully built
ntionality that does not strictly depend on jdx in order to
make your package available on more platforms. If you need it strictly,
that's OK, too.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
best,
Rafa
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 9:57 AM Uwe Ligges
wrote:
Yes, jdx has
SystemRequirements: Java Runtime Environment (&g
Yes, jdx has
SystemRequirements: Java Runtime Environment (>= 8)
hence not on Solaris.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 25.09.2020 14:44, Rafael H. M. Pereira wrote:
Hi all.
I'm having a strange error with the CRAN checks on Solaris. The Solaris
server throws the error: Package requi
s myself)
interprets this as "reply-all means replying only to
cran-submissi...@r-project.org". The wording in the email, on the other
hand, suggests I also should reply to Uwe Ligges. I find the current
disagreement of wording and email headers more than confusing.
Can someone clarify th
`:
No, it can import from the namespace, i.e. it loads the package, but
does not modify the search path (i.e. does not attach the package).
Also note the workspace (=.GlobalEnv) is not the search path.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
```
#' Function in another package, that depends on my package
Hyphens that, e.g., get auto generated in MS Word are non ASCII. You
have to declare an appropriate encoding, or even better, replace by
regular hypehsn.
See functions
tools:::showNonASCII tools:::showNonASCIIfile
that may help to see where these are...
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 25.08.2020
Pls try agaibn, if it fails again, pls let me know privately.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 26.08.2020 15:13, Nicholas Tierney wrote:
Hi Uwe,
OK thank you for that, good to know! I imagine it might be a bit tricky
to know when, but do you have an idea of when submissions might return
to normal
Friends, thias looks like a hang in the CRAN incoming feasibility
checks, hence may well be some web related issue as it seems it ran into
the timeout there.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 26.08.2020 14:57, Nicholas Tierney wrote:
Hi Michael,
I do indeed have quite a few examples in the package
I have triggered new checks on the CRAN machines.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 03.08.2020 16:42, Paul Buerkner wrote:
Dear R community,
in an effort to re-submit one of my packages (thurstonianIRT) to CRAN
because of some test failures after updates of other packages, I get the
following error from
Ideally ask Simon Urbanek who runs the Mac system.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 14.07.2020 11:42, Torsten Schöps wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to submit an updated version of the RPPanalyzer package,
because of an upcoming maintainer change for the package.
But unfortunately the update does not pass
No need to resubmit, we will trigger new checks.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 13.07.2020 10:57, Novica Nakov wrote:
Hi,
Something with the ellipsis installation on the check machines seems
broken, this is something for the CRAN team (which I am a member of) and
will be fixed.
Should I wait
Something with the ellipsis installation on the check machines seems
broken, this is something for the CRAN team (which I am a member of) and
will be fixed.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 12.07.2020 17:55, Novica Nakov wrote:
Hi,
I tried to submit a new version of the package to CRAN today and got
Not nice, but you may follow the way described in subsection
"Platform-specific documentation" in WRE.
Best,
Uwe
On 08.07.2020 03:11, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
Here's another "Non-file package-anchored link(s) ..." issue. I'd
like to reference parallel::mclapply() in my help pages. With the
sion 3 for the new files.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Thanks, Göran
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
On 08.06.2020 17:02, Gábor Csárdi wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 3:58 PM Uwe Ligges
wrote:
[...]
Nor do I how they can find out, as our idea is that CRAN cannot be
special cased.
If you want to run additional tests, you can execute them if some env
var is set that you define on machines
.
If you want to run additional tests, you can execute them if some env
var is set that you define on machines where you want to run the
additional tests.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Thanks,
Spencer Graves
On 2020-06-08 09:43, stefano wrote:
Hello Uwe,
OK sorry for that.
Best wishes.
*
for arch 'x64', Result: NOTE
Examples with CPU (user + system) or elapsed time > 10s
user system elapsed
lower_triangular-methods 11.48 011.5
Please reduce each example to less than 5 sec.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Triggers an email saying
1) *pack
Right, so "reply-all and and explain: Have these been fixed?"
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 04.06.2020 15:16, Tiago Olivoto wrote:
Dear all,
I have submitted a patch release (1.6.0) of my package metan
(https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/metan/) to fix an additional issue
and impl
Simply:
** running tests for arch 'i386' ... [14m] OK
And the CRAN threshold for the whole package is 10 min. So only the
tests for two architectures already take ~ 30 min here. which is too
much for CRAN.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 02.06.2020 16:13, Gábor Csárdi wrote:
Seems like your tests
.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 01.06.2020 23:37, R. Mark Sharp wrote:
Adelchi,
I have a similar situation where I had made all of the typical academic
references within the code and documentation for a small but important function
my package uses. I was asked by the CRAN reviewers to add the author
Spencer, I guess you have 64 bit components on the path before the new
toolchain is found.
Also check at first if you can load rJava both under 32-bit RGui and
64-bit RGui.
If this does not help: Can you send me privately the full output (i.e.
including check.log and also install.out
functions in an R package.
Is there any idea to remove this warning.
Have you exported the function?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Thanks!
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
CL
Yoiu see class(N.inv) has length > 1 hence if(cond) has a length > 1
condition and cannot deal with it (well takes only the first value),
hence rewrite to, e.g.,
if ("try-error" %in% class(V.inv))
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 02.05.2020 01:41, José Alejandro Ordoñez wrote:
Good even
My wild guess is that 'r ' indicates there is an invisible char after
the r that is not representable in the chosen encoding.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 02.05.2020 01:12, Matthew Young wrote:
I’ve tried both ways (with and without a space after the backtick) and get the
same error.
From: Max
' and
'stderr'. In this case, how can I avoid this warning?
Not use those calls, see Writing R Extensions.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Thanks,
--Sameh
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch
, CRAN reports issues for system calls (made by `git2r` and
`whoami`, I guess)
for my package on r-patched-solaris-x86 only, so I am not sure how to reproduce
them.
Yes, but as SystemRequirements are not alsways fullfilled, you should
test whether these are available before use.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
keywords are not mandatory.
You can invent your own keywords and use them in
\concept{}
entries.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 17.04.2020 02:57, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
You can get away with a lot if you are not distributing your package. But I
usually try to satisfy R CMD check at least.
On April
that.
Or better create it in tempdir(): I guess you used paste(tempdir(), ...)
instead of file.path() and got afilename one level above tempdir()?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Duncan Murdoch
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch
Yes, should be fixed by tmorrow,
Uwe
On 08.04.2020 00:16, Martin Morgan wrote:
This is the same as
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-package-devel/2020q1/005256.html
and due I believe to stale packages on the CRAN windows builder; the solution
is I believe on the CRAN side.
Martin Morgan
I just looked, you got a repsonse from Swetlana Herbrandt on Dec 16.
Will forward privately.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 10.04.2020 05:08, John Lawson wrote:
Ok, thanks.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 1:46 PM Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
On 09/04/2020 3:28 p.m., John Lawson wrote:
I submitted the Package
Actually we had the Windows platform for incomign tests on
stringsAsFactors = TRUE
for checking back compatibility to older versions of R, but this is no
longer possible for new versions of R-devel.
Can you pls simply resubmit the same version?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 31.03.2020 03:07, Duncan
Pls write to c...@r-project.org.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 30.03.2020 01:09, fvaf...@mailbox.org wrote:
Dear All,
inspired by Karl Broman`s reader on using 'knitr' with 'asciidoc'
(http://kbroman.org/knitr_knutshell/pages/asciidoc.html), I wrote package
rasciidoc some time ago.
It is just a wrapper
'vign_test' already exists
I do not get it when checking your package.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Under macOS 10.15.3 it finishes fine.
"grep 'vign_test'" failed to find anything.
???
Thanks,
Spencer Graves
p.s. Running R 3.6.3 on both m
the paranoid nature of the website's security system, it's hard
to offer a good solution to your problem: linking to it may place
people running R CMD check into temporary ban, while not linking to it
does not seem polite.
Well, then mention the URL in plain text but not link
Best,
Uwe Ligges
its own rules; you might want to ask
there, given the subject matter of your package.
Thanks, Duncan, same from here, just to confrim from a "part of CRAN"
point of view.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Duncan Murdoch
Alois Schlögl
[1] https://github.com/schloegl/mxe
Am 3/16/20
defined in ./R.
I haven't looked at the details, but if you fullfilled tjhe above,
please simply resubmit or in case you do not need to change anytrhing,
simply say so and respond to the CRAN team member CCing
cran-submissions@...
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 16.03.2020 05:22, R. Mark Sharp wrote:
I
Sorry, takes longer as I we use a lot of COU cychecking ...
Uwe
On 11.03.2020 15:23, Joe Thorley wrote:
Hi All
Version 0.4.0 of the chk package was accepted by CRAN over a week ago (on March
3rd 2020).
However, the windows binaries have not yet updated for r-devel and r-release.
I do not speak roxygen, but you have to register the S3 method.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 10.03.2020 17:28, fpaloma...@correo.ugr.es wrote:
Hi, I thiks its weird:
The error is: no applicable method for 'fit' applied to an object of
class "model_sslr"
In the code:
#' fit
#'
#' @title
We do not accept submissions that strongnly depend on orphaned packages
as these are subject to be archived from CRAN.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 10.03.2020 17:48, John Lawson wrote:
The package daewr contains the data sets and functions shown in the book
"Design and Analysis of Experiments w
Please simply submit a new version ideally without sugesting the
archived one as you apparently do not need it for your paclkage's
functionality at all.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 09.03.2020 10:43, Fabio Corradini Santander wrote:
Hi,
I recently submitted my frist package to CRAN (
https://CRAN.R
On 05.03.2020 09:45, Rolf Turner wrote:
On 5/03/20 9:04 pm, Tomas Kalibera wrote:
On 3/5/20 4:26 AM, John Lawson wrote:
I see this error on the CRAN Check report
Fatal error: the condition has length > 1
The problem is that the condition t1 == "I" & t2 == "(" of the if
statement in
ed, as people also use winbuilder for the check results these days,
I will remove that sentence.
The queues were stuck due to some processes that the watchdog was not
able to kill entirely. Now oen and rnnign again.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
Yes, queue is stuck, will be cleared up by tomorrow,
Uwe Ligges
On 21.02.2020 18:01, Gianmarco Alberti wrote:
Thank you.
So, it’s better to wait for few days?
Best
Gm
Dr Gianmarco Alberti (PhD Udine)
Lecturer in Spatial Forensics
Coordinator
incoming
checks: You can well submit further on, but submissions won't be auto
processed for that time.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
voidable that for users to exploit multiple cores
they must specify a non-default function argument, or similar?
Exactly.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/l
On 05.02.2020 16:42, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Then this is specific to your package,
I meant the new one, not the one on CRAN which is also similarly quick
(less than 10% difference).
Best,
Uwe Ligges
see the overall timings for the
whole CRAN check:
https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks
even be the other way round.
And for PerformanceAnalytics I get overall 418 sec for old and 446 sec
(without vignettes each) for the new toolchain (again, load may have
varied):
https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_PerformanceAnalytics.html
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 05.02.2020 16
ges/release/bioc/html/M3C.html).
BioC is a standard repository that you do not need to delcare.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Would this be the correct way to conditionally use a package from
Bioconductor in own packages?
Best
Daniel
--
_
t;
... Where you probably have \. and need \\.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
However, I can't find the original file where the error is found. I
have
try unsuccessfully for several hours :(
any suggestions on how to find it?
thanks!
Marcelo
El mar., 4 feb. 2020 a las 8:34, Dirk Eddelbuettel ()
es
but no function listed in the \usage section uses '...'.
The question is why you don't always get that warning.
Because there was a bug in R that the warnings was not produced for a
long time, and this is now fixed in recent verisons of R-devel. Hence ou
only get it here.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Bill
No, for Windows you may use winbuilder that comes very close. More
generally you can try r-hub for all OSes, but that is less close.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 30.01.2020 22:40, Borini, Stefano wrote:
I am currently trying to submit a package to CRAN, and I see no problems in
running the test
-lrtmp -lssl -lssh2 -lcrypto -lgdi32 -lz
-lws2_32 -lwldap32 -lwinmm
and that is wrong as -LC:/extsoft/lib/i386 or C:/extsoft/lib/x64 are not
directories where the software is installed on winbuilder.
Pls use the directories the other packages are using, too.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 26.
78 marked UTF-8 strings*
Fine for CRAN.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
The package has been on CRAN for years now, and it's the first time I get
this note. Checking with R 3.6.2, I still get:
checking data for non-ASCII characters ... OK
The package contains 4 sample data frames, two of which
field from the Authors@R field and indert the person with cre role as
maintainer.
Please fix and resubmit.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 23.01.2020 15:21, Sowmya C wrote:
Dear CRAN/DEVEL Team,
I am looking forward for kind reply. The two NOTEs are intended changes
that we made and I think
Don't worry, this is an issue that trhe CRAN incoimng checks have not
uncovered with a new farvber version. As we found the breakage later in
regular checks, the farver package has been rolled back on CRAN, hence
pls simpy ignore the problem for your own packages.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Probably some race condition. Simply submit a new versin.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 11.01.2020 03:10, Chris Brien wrote:
Hi list members,
On checking the CRAN Package Check Results for my package growthPheno I find
that there is the error below for r-devel-windows-ix86+x86_64, but not for
r
My guess is that you have nmot properly closed open connections?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 29.12.2019 05:30, Artem Klevtsov wrote:
Hello,
The package is R bindings of the uap-cpp library using Rcpp. Package also
includes re2 and yaml-cpp libs (included in the source tree and built with
Makevars
.3229615
and we do not have a field fo it, but you can cite it within the
Description field and link to it via a sentence and DOI such as:
"See R.M. Krug and O. Petchey (2019) ."
Best,
Uwe Ligges
To the DESCRIPTION file. This raises not an error during check, but tells me,
esssages
we receive. That one has now been answered.
2. I do not see a submission fom Nov 25. Can you simply resubmit and
make sure you click on the confirmation link?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Duncan Murdoch
Best,
Tiago Olivoto
-Mensagem original-
De: Duncan Murdoch
Enviada em: domingo
Have you tried to write to CRAN@... and ask if thirs party software can
be installed on CRAN?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 11.12.2019 10:39, Serguei Sokol wrote:
Hi,
I have tried to submit my new package
https://github.com/sgsokol/r2sundials to CRAN but submission seems to be
dismissed.
The package
Ideally yoiu wpuld host the data elsewhere and submit a CRAN package
that allows users to easily get/merge/aggregate the data.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 12.12.2019 20:55, b...@denney.ws wrote:
Hello,
I have two questions about creating data packages for data that will be
updated
That was a bug in Biostrings that has been fixed in the meantime.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 05.12.2019 05:19, Hugh Parsonage wrote:
rgb is from package grDevices not package base.
On Thu, 5 Dec 2019 at 2:48 pm, Dalgleish, James (NIH/NCI) [V] via
R-package-devel wrote:
Question:
NIPTeR
likely included in error. See section 'Package
structure' in the 'Writing R Extensions' manual.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 02.12.2019 18:46, Rafael Pereira wrote:
Thanks for the heads up, Ivan. In any case, I’ll change the encoding of the
database.
Uwe, I’m faxing this issue in the geobr package
h packages is this?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
I have used to code below to identify my scripts that have strings using
non-ASCII characters. The problem is that in most cases these non-ASCII
characters are used in the documentation of functions, so I cannot simply
convert their encoding using iconv() for examp
Pls ignore the knitr et all missings for now, some hicc up on the check
machine caused an inconsistent setup. We will fix this shortly.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 01.12.2019 00:06, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 30 November 2019 at 18:29, Mauricio Vargas wrote:
| This is the 1st time that the pre
See section 4.3.3 "Using the Address Sanitizer" in Writing R Extensions.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 29.11.2019 17:58, Youyi Fong wrote:
Hello, I would like to reproduce this error locally:
https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/bdr/memtests/clang-ASAN/chngpt/00check.log
I followed the tutori
We had to install the most recent pandoc release as the old failed for
the recent texlive release with rmarkdown.
Apparently pandoc gives a different error message for empty titles now.
The simplest solution would be to provide a proper title anyway.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 27.11.2019 22:33
a package with the above size of (uncompressed)
directories.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Suggestions?
Thanks,
Spencer Graves
On 2019-11-21 11:43, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 21 November 2019 at 16:43, Joris Meys wrote:
| The workflow as described in the manual :
|
https://cr
Can you pls send a message to Simon?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 05.11.2019 14:38, Lionel Henry wrote:
Hello,
rlang 0.4.1 was released on 24th of October, but the macOS binaries
haven't been distributed yet. Is the binary service down?
I also see the check results for macOS haven't been published
What happens if you disable byte code compilation?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 02.11.2019 19:37, Viktor Gal wrote:
Hi Dirk,
no worries, thnx for the feedback!
cheers,
viktor
On 2 Nov 2019, at 13:58, Viktor Gal wrote:
Hi Dirk,
so the project is open source, you can reproduce the error yourself
Well, binaries may well have different sizes on different platforms,
aslo when statically linkd vs dynamically linked etc.
In this case, you should not worry.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 15.10.2019 18:46, Dalgleish, James (NIH/NCI) [V] via R-package-devel
wrote:
On Solaris, I'm finding that my
before.
Nobody reported this so far. Apparently my cron service died and no on
demand checks have been performed since saturday.
I restarted cron now, but it will take a while to process the queues.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Same for R-devel. Permission problems?
Thanks,
-Roy
On Oct 14, 2019
Please resubmit, we had a space problem oin the check machine.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 13.10.2019 07:00, Dalgleish, James (NIH/NCI) [V] via R-package-devel
wrote:
* using log directory 'd:/RCompile/CRANincoming/R-devel/CNVScope.Rcheck'
* using R Under development (unstable) (2019-10-10 r77275
calling R CMD build? Is it rebuilt
by R CMD build?
... and are ghostscript and qpdf on your PATH so that R picks it up?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Duncan Murdoch
Best regards
Juhee Lee.
---
Sys.which(Sys.getenv("R_GSCMD"))
C:\\Program Files\\gs\\gs
given there are
dozens of new submissions on a single day.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 15.09.2019 19:49, John Harrold wrote:
Hello Max,
The comment I received was:
Please ensure that you do not use more than 2 cores in your examples.
I believe the only output I received was these incoming pretest
On 15.09.2019 05:39, John Harrold wrote:
Thanks Uwe,
Is there a way to find out on my end where this is happening?
Yes, simply set the env var
_R_CHECK_LIMIT_CORES_=true
to reproduce.
Best,
Uwe
Thanks
john
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 10:51 PM Uwe Ligges
<mailto:lig...@statistik
that requires doParallel or was this triggered because one of my
examples actually used more than 2 cores?
The latter. In examples, vignettes and tests you must not start more
than 2 workers as resources for CRAN checks are limited.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Thanks
John
).
Then one gets an HTTP 404.
All true, just le to me add: CRAN sends many requests to these sites a
day, hence they may reject CRAN traffic, which you can simply ignore.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
How do I modify it?
You can't. Be patient. As stated in the note, wait for a member of CRAN
to check
e the links via the (ideally stable) DOI as in
.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Thank you in advance for any help.
Eric
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/
that these files are created in the check directory when
running the examples, but I don't understand what's the matter with this?
because you must not write to the user filespace in examples as detailed
in the CRAN policies. Please rather write to tempdir() in examples.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
What should
Simply submit as it is, false positives in spell checks will be
confirmed in the submission process by a CRAN team member when they
appear the first time in the package.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 20.08.2019 00:13, John Harrold wrote:
Hello,
I am attempting to submit my first package to CRAN. I
Dear package developers,
the CRAN incoming queue will be closed from Aug 09, 2019 to Aug 18,
2019. Hence package submissions are only possible before and after that
period.
CRAN maintainance work and some work on a possibly forthcoming Windows
toolchain will be pushed forward.
Best,
Uwe
Checks with address sanitizers have to be done with instrumnted R
versions and take a long time, hence we run these checks less frequently
and only under one platform (here Linux for simplicity).
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 26.07.2019 08:50, Jiahuan ye wrote:
Hi,
Recently, my first r package
I'd suggest not to use pipes in package code, as the parser does not
know about them and hence debugging, error messages are more
obfuscated.
Why not use he functional way of R?
For the question: I guess you do not have a corresponding entry in the
NAMESPACE file?
Best,
Uwe
On
Thanks, a good example for the case at hand, where it again does not
help that there is a mailing list, but apparently nobody feels
responsible and the CRAN team had to fix the package twice already.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 26.06.2019 03:00, Dario Strbenac wrote:
Good day,
What about the CRAN
The CRAN team has very bad experiences in the past when various people
of research groups reponded with non coordinated answers. Hence the
decision was made that we only want to talk to a dedicated maintainer
who is responsible for the submission. And we want to know who that is.
Best,
Uwe
Yes, it is.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 26.06.2019 00:00, John Muschelli wrote:
Understood, thanks for the clarification. Is it acceptable to have
gmail tagged emails such as muschellij2+f...@gmail.com
<mailto:muschellij2%2bf...@gmail.com> for different packages (such as fslr)?
Best,
John
201 - 300 of 512 matches
Mail list logo
