What is a "right side window"? Are you mixing up what R does and what RStudio
does? I think I agree with Ivan that this is a question about the environment
in which you are loading the package rather than anything in the package itself.
On March 7, 2024 11:21:06 AM PST, "Ruff, Sergej"
wrote:
Remove leading periods from all file names in the tar.gz. Use .Rbuildignore to
handle such files in your dev directory if you need them. Maybe also look at
[1].
[1]
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/40950799/r-cmd-check-error-how-to-get-rid-of-hidden-files-and-directory-in-devel-r-pack
On
Are you aware of this [1]? J. Random Lurker may not be a reliable source, and
actual CRAN repo maintainers are probably a bit busy...
[1] https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/policies.html#Submission
On February 8, 2024 8:37:50 AM PST, Josiah Parry wrote:
>I intend to change the maintainer
Type conversions are always a bit risky... this one appears to be likely to
corrupt data. If they actually intended to truncate values like this then they
should have cast explicitly.
Looks like you need to report this to the SUNDIALS maintainers.
On February 3, 2024 7:38:35 AM PST,
This is a narrow view of the world. As has been mentioned here by Tomas, the
issue at this point is that a very widely-used operating system does not allow
the absolute path to be longer than 254 characters unless users make
possibly-breaking changes to their OS configuration. If a user is
Rhub is not CRAN. Please include a link to your source package if you want
help. If there is actually a bug in Rhub then this NUL error may not reflect
the response you will get from CRAN if and when you submit.
On December 13, 2023 12:58:41 AM PST, Friedemann von Lampe
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>when
Richard ... they are by different maintainers. They also are built with
completely different underlying technologies... creating a bitmap is easy,
deciphering one is difficult and may not be necessary in the same workflow and
there may be different compiled code available optimized for
A code chunk does always begin with a triple backtick at the beginning of a
line. The term for what you encountered is "inline code" used to embed computed
results into the markdown text as though you had typed them directly.
Check out
ROFL! Seconded!
The quote itself has a bit of greybeard smell to it, but the "ran out of stuff
to delete at 100GB with 1000 out of 6000 targets compiled" had me in stitches.
On October 31, 2023 10:16:10 AM PDT, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
>On 31 October 2023 at 19:58, Ivan Krylov wrote:
>|
Installed packages may not be modified because they are permitted to be
installed with read-only access. You have no option to proceed in this
direction.
Configuration files are normally stored in the user's working directory.
Dotfiles are a common convention in *nix operating systems, but in
R could care less about what is in PATH... there is however a difference
between Windows parsing PATH and how CMD lets you quote things interactively.
The whole point of PATH is to let you or R provide simple program names like
qpdf without knowing where they are... Windows takes over and looks
This error arises because you are not declaring the function properly before
you call it... likely because you have not included the appropriate header file
or because you have typoed the function call.
If you provide a link to your package someone may point you more precisely to
your error,
h is part of public R C
>api.
>Should I notice something relevant in the source of R's order?
>
>Best
>Jan
>
>On Sun, Sep 24, 2023, 17:27 Jeff Newmiller wrote:
>
>> Have you read the output of
>>
>> order
>>
>> entered at the R console?
>&
Have you read the output of
order
entered at the R console?
On September 24, 2023 1:38:41 AM PDT, Jan Gorecki wrote:
>Dear pkg developers,
>
>Are there any ways to check which sorting algorithm is being used when
>calling `order` function? Documentation at
I thought roxygen supported documenting NULL constants for data.
I do think roxygen ought to be able to co-exist with Rd files... but the claim
that documenting data requires Rd files smells fishy to me.
On September 21, 2023 1:30:11 PM PDT, Michael L Friendly
wrote:
>I am an RStudio user,
None of us here are lawyers, but a simple google search should take you to
discussions such as [1]. There is a long history of debates about the upsides
and downsides of restricting how people can use your source code.
My short take is that a GPL license prevents anyone from stuffing your code
Yes.
Demo/test files need to use the library function to attach the package like any
other user.
On September 13, 2023 5:24:52 PM PDT, "Richard M. Heiberger"
wrote:
>I have a demo file that uses a function defined in the package.
>when I force the demo to be run with
>R CMD check
I don't know how you can negotiate with CRAN regarding attach, but one approach
is to return the data frame and instruct your students to write
moodledata <- paste.data()
instead of
paste.data()
since either is just as obscure as the other in the mind of a beginner and the
former
CRAN doesn't care about whether devtools is happy. R CMD check --as-cran needs
to work, e.g. as in [1].
Devtools is a convenience tool to help put all of the necessary bits in the
right places in your source code according to [2]. But if there is any
disagreement about what works, devtools is
You have a really bizarre way of twisting what others are saying, Dirk. I have
seen no-one here saying 'limit R to 2 threads' except for you, as a way to
paint opposing views to be absurd.
What _is_ being said is that users need to be in control_, but _the default
needs to do least harm_ until
performing if they link with
compiled code that is supposed to make use of threads.
On August 23, 2023 7:24:46 AM PDT, Uwe Ligges
wrote:
>
>
>On 23.08.2023 15:58, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
>> To whom are you addressing this question? The OpenMP developers who define
>> the mis
To whom are you addressing this question? The OpenMP developers who define the
missing-OMP_THREAD_LIMIT behaviour and-or supply default config files? The CRAN
server administrators who set the variable in their site-wide configuration
intentionally or unintentionally? Or the package authors
Use of precompiled code is not allowed in CRAN. This looks like your package
needs to be distributed elsewhere... e.g. via GitHub.
On July 12, 2023 6:41:11 AM PDT, Russell Almond
wrote:
>I have an R package (RNetica available at
>https://ralmond.r-universe.dev/RNetica and
Sure. On your computer. Install the old version of R and let it serve the
relevant docs.
Dunno of anyone doing this historical dive online for you though. Why would you
want preformatted docs if you didn't have those old versions installed?
On June 29, 2023 4:23:55 PM PDT, David Hugh-Jones
if (any(c( "alaska", "hawaii") %in% zoom)){}
On June 27, 2023 9:11:09 AM PDT, "Göran Broström" wrote:
>
>
>Den 2023-06-27 kl. 17:17, skrev Göran Broström:
>> If(zoom %in% c(“alaska”, “hawaii”)…
>
>Wrong, maybe
>
>if (("alaska" %in% zoom) || ("hawaii" %in% zoom)){}
>
>
>>
>> Göran
>>
>>> 27
Your mistake is confusing a tool designed for _iterative development_ for a
tool designed for _delivery_.
Use R CMD build the way WRE says you should.
On May 16, 2023 9:07:05 AM PDT, Jarrett Phillips
wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>I'm trying to generate a `tar.gz` file on a Mac for R package submission
Long build time for vignettes?
On January 22, 2023 10:51:30 AM PST, Klaus Schliep
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
>I try to submit a new version of the package phangorn and got the mail back:
>
>"Dear maintainer,
>
>package phangorn_2.11.0.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks
>automatically, please
Isn't the whole purpose of creating a new package to introduce new algorithms?
That there is a history related to the modelsummary package is fine, but I
think the request is for references to published discussion of why modelsummary
needed to be augmented with new algorithms. It seems to me
Educating package authors about the semantics of URLs is not really something
the CRAN maintainers should have to do. A slash at the end of a URL implies
different URL construction for relative URLs based on the original one. [1]
I am not sure why you think https is no more secure than http...
This is definitely not a false positive. Find a way to not run long calcs
during the CRAN build. There is no alternative.
One way this can be done is by only running your examples when an environment
variable of your choosing exists. Since CRAN machines won't configure that
variable, you can
zones (UTC and local civil are a common
combination). Again, character import and manual conversion are needed.
On October 10, 2022 9:40:42 AM PDT, Hadley Wickham wrote:
>On Sun, Oct 9, 2022 at 9:31 PM Jeff Newmiller wrote:
>>
>> ... which is why tidyverse functions and Python da
... which is why tidyverse functions and Python datetime handling irk me so
much.
Is tidyverse time handling intrinsically broken? They have a standard practice
of reading time as UTC and then using force_tz to fix the "mistake". Same as
Python.
On October 9, 2022 6:57:06 PM PDT, Simon
It looks like you are reading directly from URLs? How do you know the delay is
not network I/O delay?
Parallel computation is not a panacea. It allows tasks _that are CPU-bound_ to
get through the CPU-intensive work faster. You need to be certain that your
tasks actually can benefit from
If you haven't settled on exactly which approach you want to use in
accomplishing the main goals of your exported package functions, then hiding
the gory details can make it easier to tell people later to sod off when you
decide those gory details functions should act different or use different
Things like sensible legends are also impeded by using complex expressions in
aesthetics mappings, so call it a workaround if you like but creating the data
frame the way it should be _before_ giving it to ggplot has always been
recommended.
On April 30, 2022 5:09:51 AM PDT, Duncan Murdoch
Thanks to the ubiquity of Excel and its misguided inclusion of BOM codes in its
UTF-8 CSV format, this optimism about encoding being a corner case seems
premature. There are actually multiple options in Excel for writing CSV files,
and only one of them (not the first one fortunately) has this
I don't know the answer to your question, but "beyond my ken" doesn't sound
like a very convincing reason. Mucking with any environment that isn't yours is
asking for trouble... the behavior you depend on today may come into conflict
with the code you are coordinating with when you least expect
Google?
https://developer.r-project.org/Blog/public/2020/03/17/socket-connections-update/
https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/understanding-sockets
https://developer.ibm.com/tutorials/l-sockpit/
On November 27, 2021 2:36:48 PM PST, Ben Engbers wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Looks promising!
Maybe time to learn it. At least to assemble complete messages.
That said, the design of this protocol is intrinsically inefficient. Maybe they
will upgrade if the software gets popular.
On November 27, 2021 8:24:36 AM PST, Ben Engbers
wrote:
>Op 27-11-2021 om 17:03 schreef Jeff Newmil
This is a null-terminated message protocol [1]. It has to be processed one byte
at a time.
[1] https://docs.basex.org/wiki/Server_Protocol
On November 27, 2021 7:45:31 AM PST, Gabor Grothendieck
wrote:
>Whether the length is variable or not isn't relevant. The point is
>whether the message is
You should ALWAYS build with the latest stable AND the latest development
versions of R before submitting.
On November 15, 2021 6:33:12 PM PST, Michael Hellstern wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I maintain a package (netgsa) that has been on CRAN since september 2021
>and recently got an email about CRAN
Keep in mind that by embedding this decision into your package you may be
consuming a resource (cores) that may be more efficiently allocated by an
application-level partitioning. of available resources. I for one am not a fan
of this kind of thinking, and it makes system requirements for your
Duncan has used the phrase "do regular operations on the object" to divide the
use cases and emphasized that needing the attributes might be important, but he
did not come out and remind you that if you _do_ perform regular operations on
it then the outputs of those operations are likely to
as a way to identify a path, but if he
covers all cases then my opinion is just an opinion.
On September 30, 2021 2:34:48 PM PDT, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
>On 30/09/2021 5:21 p.m., Jeff Newmiller wrote:
>> What if you are on Windows but running R at the command prompt, or via
What if you are on Windows but running R at the command prompt, or via cygwin,
or in the console window of RStudio?
This seems unstable to me.
On September 30, 2021 11:52:16 AM PDT, Andrew Simmons
wrote:
>Hello,
>
>
>I'm updating my package 'this.path' which is supposed to retrieve the
Grace is in the eyes of the beholder.
Using stop in your functions can be perfectly valid. But within the context of
examples or tests you need to catch those errors because one key definition of
success in normal building of a package is that no uncaught errors occur. So
either don't call
I agree... but trouble is in the eyes of the beholder. If OP's approval process
requires use of actively-maintained software, then use of code depending on one
of these "retired"/"superceded" packages could indeed be a problem... for the
OP. OP cannot expect to be able to impose those
is concerned about... not
the label applied to that status.
On September 21, 2021 8:50:32 AM PDT, "Lenth, Russell V"
wrote:
>... "I am not fixing this hot mess"??? To the contrary, the README contains a
>clearly expressed intention to maintain plyr to keep in on C
There is nothing official about that term. However, the meaning as intended by
the package authors seems pretty clear to me, and if some organization decides
not to allow software that is not being maintained to be relied upon then that
is their decision. I don't think slapping a different
I can't really see why it should be "recommended" to handle installing system
requirements inside an R package. There are many ways to satisfy such
requirements that would not involve miniconda. If you were determined to
provide such support, doing so in a normal function documented in a
This advice would apply if the errors were being generated on a computer under
the package developer's control... but this looks like it is from a repo
submission.
That said, if the developer has installed packages not currently in BioC for
R4.1.1 they may need to wait for those packages to
Exactly what errors do you think you found? It is not an error for a package to
be compatible with a range of versions of R.
On September 6, 2021 4:02:08 AM PDT, Colin Gillespie
wrote:
>Dear All,
>
>Sorry if this is the wrong mailing address.
>
>I was doing a little investigation of R versions
Spelling has different importance to different people. You are expressing a
value judgement that differs from the values of R Core, but are presenting your
opinion as if they are facts. My point is that your challenging attitude IMO
makes having a conversation about those concerns difficult. (I
Just don't. E.g.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12598242/global-variables-in-packages-in-r
On June 22, 2021 1:47:56 AM PDT, Siddhanta Phuyal
wrote:
> Hello,
>
>A few weeks ago, I submitted a package to CRAN. The automated system
>rejected the package showing the following note:
>
>Found
This is a job for a detective, not a package developer mailing list participant.
If this condition persists, CRAN will archive the package, as maintaining a
valid email address is required.
On June 18, 2021 5:29:20 PM PDT, mai zhou wrote:
>Dear developers,
>
>I was trying to send an email to
for their non-free software
tarpits, and transferring GPL2 code to MIT without the GPL2 author explicitly
re-releasing as MIT would allow that.
On June 2, 2021 11:51:01 PM PDT, Berwin A Turlach
wrote:
>G'day Jeff,
>
>On Wed, 02 Jun 2021 11:34:21 -0700
>Jeff Newmiller wrote:
>
>Not
MIT is more permissive than GPL2, so there is a collision there. But you may be
able to work it out with the author?
On June 2, 2021 10:36:00 AM PDT, Ben Staton wrote:
>My package uses the MIT license, so would that not meet the
>compatibility
>requirements?
>
>I will attempt to reach out to
Make examples shorter so they can run faster. Wrapping everything in donttest
means that running examples() does nothing, which is counterproductive.
Techinically, vignettes are not tests or examples... but they do have the
advantage that they don't have to run quickly. But that doesn't make a
Why aren't you using system.file()?
On May 11, 2021 1:45:37 PM PDT, Tiago Olivoto wrote:
>Dear all,
>I just submitted a new package 'pliman' (
>https://github.com/TiagoOlivoto/pliman) and it does not pass the
>incoming
>checks automatically.
>I have some images that are under '/inst/tmp_images'
Maybe use r.rsp?
https://blog.r-hub.io/2020/06/03/vignettes/
How to include my pre-print / cheatsheet as a PDF vignette?
On April 8, 2021 12:39:20 PM PDT, "Dr. Connie Brett"
wrote:
>Hello,
>I have a package (DGEobj) that depends on the Ensembl service to look
>up information used to build
I don't think those settings apply to that file. Search for "sysdata.rda" in
[1].
[1] https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-exts.html
On April 1, 2021 3:11:17 AM PDT, Peter Ruckdeschel
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I just noticed that, last week-end, R CMD build was changed to remove
Don't run check against your development directory. Run it against the tar.gz
file.
On March 4, 2021 5:09:07 AM PST, Jose Barrera wrote:
>Dear all,
>
>devtools::check() gives me the following NOTE:
>
>* Non-standard files/directories found at top level:
> ‘README.Rmd’ ‘miclust.Rproj’
>
>I
Technically, git does not record file history... it records commit history, and
reconstructs file history as needed. The contents of a file identify it
uniquely among all commits ever made regardless of which directory it was ever
in. IMO this is the main reason why git is superior and I put up
This is normally where the Suggests field is used.
On January 8, 2021 6:17:58 AM PST, Greg Freedman Ellis
wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I'm trying to update a package to conform to pass tests given
>`_R_CHECK_DEPENDS_ONLY_=TRUE`.
>
>In this package, we only use the package `httptest` during testing, but
Sheepish grins may be good for character building, but MREs are good for
solving problems. You can choose which you want first! ;-)
On January 6, 2021 9:50:13 AM PST, Jarrod Hadfield wrote:
>Dear Duncan and Michael,
>
>Thank you for the quick replies. When trying to generate a reproducible
>
For "obvious" reasons? I don't see this kind of avoidance as "obviously"
correct at all. You have a dependency... it should be declared. There are
various ways to proceed, with Imports or Depends or Suggests or pulling the
code into your package... but trying to subvert the dependency
Examples should use dontrun to avoid calling functions that call stop.
On December 12, 2020 8:24:50 AM PST, Michael L Friendly
wrote:
>I got the email below concerning 3 of my packages but wonder if they
>are false alarms or
>if not, how to locate & fix the problem.
>
>This concerns
Don't test against a live website for most of your testing... use recorded or
simulated input. If your package functional interface doesn't allow for that,
then re-factor it so it does.
For those tests that actually have to interact with the live website, only run
them if you know you are not
Section 2.1 of the Writing R Extensions manual points out that percent symbols
must (practically) always be escaped in Rd files. This includes within URLs.
On November 3, 2020 2:08:05 AM PST, "Maëlle SALMON via R-package-devel"
wrote:
>Hello,
>
>1) I found (via GitHub search for DOIs in
You are addressing interpretation of "a license", while my concern is not with
the licenses themselves but with the identification of which code goes with
which license. Assuming that you will need to retain lawyers to decide how to
handle a license in a particular use case may be reasonable,
Hadley offers what you _can_ do, but if you want clarity in the minds of
_users_ I would beg you to split the code into two packages. People will likely
either be afraid of the GPL bogey man and refrain from utilizing your MIT code
as permitted or fail to honor the GPL terms correctly if both
As Duncan said, if you are calling FROM a function in your package, and the
function you are CALLING is in the same package, then you do NOT need any
colons at all, whether exported or not.
On September 14, 2020 7:30:12 AM PDT, "Wang, Zhu" wrote:
>In mypkg, I want to call a function foo from
I would not read anything into this. Does [1] help?
[1] https://jef.works/blog/2018/06/18/get-your-package-on-cran-in-10-steps/
On September 12, 2020 1:58:15 PM PDT, Simit Patel wrote:
>hello,
>
>
>i am submitting my first package for CRAN, but am failing pre-check on
>windows and debian.
If your article is published with a DOI and read by anyone actually interested
in it then it will be likely be accessed, so "never" seems rather pessimistic
of you. You could simply not argue with your editor and acquiesce.
On September 10, 2020 9:14:12 AM PDT, "Kevin R. Coombes"
wrote:
The whole point of the Suggests package relationship is that you don't actually
have to have it installed to use the package. It does have to be installed to
check the package, which allows the link to be tested at least once before
being released.
On August 7, 2020 8:02:47 AM PDT, "Brian G.
I suspect your foo and bar variables are not logical anymore... insufficient
info. However, why aren't you using short-circuit && and || operators?
On July 22, 2020 5:36:06 AM PDT, "Helmut Schütz"
wrote:
>Dear all,
>
>I have two variables, foo and bar. The first is TRUE if a png should be
>
Looks like 187 opportunities to improve clarity.
On July 16, 2020 11:30:37 AM PDT, Ben Bolker wrote:
>FWIW/in defense of the OP, this is a *very* common idiom in the base R
>code base. There may be some false positives, but
>
> find . -name "*.Rd" -exec grep -Fl "stopifnot(" {} \; | grep -v
The point of an example is to provide an illustration of how the function
should be used for people who are not software developers. IMO any use of any
other functions should be absolutely minimized to reduce the cognitive overload
("you need to understand 13 other concepts before you can
Perhaps:
https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/generics/index.html
On July 10, 2020 4:51:52 PM PDT, "Pavel N. Krivitsky"
wrote:
>Dear All,
>
>I would like to have two packages that do not depend on each other that
>have an identical generic to be able to dispatch to each other's (non-
Your choice. Do you want to support people using older versions of R, or not?
On June 29, 2020 1:55:02 PM PDT, "Göran Broström" wrote:
>I added two data sets (.rda) to my package eha, but when I build the
>new
>version I get:
>
> WARNING: Added dependency on R >= 3.5.0 because serialized
t;says.
>
>So like I said in my original posting, good idea in an alternative
>universe
>where copyright law does not exist.
>
>On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 1:13 PM Jeff Newmiller
>
>wrote:
>
>> Just describe the nature of the data sets literally as though the
>book was
Just describe the nature of the data sets literally as though the book was
inaccessible. They are not asking you to describe how one should analyze the
the data, so there really shouldn't be any conflict with the book content that
your agreement with the author has not already resolved.
If you
Use a different name than "data" such as "rawdata" within "inst" to put files
that your code refers to using the system.name() function. The directory name
"data" is used for a specific purpose as described in the Writing R Extensions
manual [1], and if you want to put files in that directory
r copyleft license. If there is a
>term
>which reflects that mechanism from a discipline other than biology,
>please let me know.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Avi
>
>On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 8:25 PM Jeff Newmiller
>
>wrote:
>
>> "Viral" is has connotations that reflect
"Viral" is has connotations that reflect the biases of the person using the
term. A less loaded perspective is that some people don't want you to take
their contributions out of circulation by using it as the foundation of your
proprietary work. If you want to close it up, build from scratch or
AGS.
>b) Syntax passed checkbashisms so I expect no problems due to that.
>
>On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 4:03 PM Jeff Newmiller
> wrote:
>>
>> I don't know anything about the function of that environment
>variable, but
>>
>> a) system() invokes a child process so
I don't know anything about the function of that environment variable, but
a) system() invokes a child process so environment variable changes made using
it will only affect the child process created by that system call.
b) The syntax you have used is shell-specific, so does not look portable.
Sorry, ESP not working today. Note that this list may or may not include the
reviewer who last checked your submission.
Perhaps re-read [1] and if you are still puzzled then consider pointing us to
(or pasting into the body of the email) the DESCRIPTION file you are having
difficulty with so
Maybe your use of those packages represent use cases that are not tested by
those packages. If you pare down your code that triggers these problems to
small reproducible examples then you can contribute them to those packages?
On April 27, 2020 11:05:49 PM PDT, fvaf...@mailbox.org wrote:
>Dear
This is a highly OS-specific dependency. Are you sure you need this? Is it
listed in your SystemRequirements entry in your DESCRIPTION file?
On April 26, 2020 6:41:27 AM PDT, "Sameh M. Abdulah"
wrote:
>I am getting this error when trying to install my package on CRAN. Do I
>need to contact
I agree that my example was not optimal, but I was trying to duplicate the
existing behaviour with the exception of use of global variables.
On April 18, 2020 3:02:17 PM PDT, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
>On 18/04/2020 5:55 p.m., Jeff Newmiller wrote:
>> See below:
>>
>> On Sa
olombia, Bogot?
phone: +571 3165000 ext 13406
address: Av. NQS (Carrera 30) # 45-03, Hydraulics Lab (408-213)
email: dazamo...@unal.edu.co
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-packa
You can get away with a lot if you are not distributing your package. But I
usually try to satisfy R CMD check at least.
On April 16, 2020 5:50:04 PM PDT, Rolf Turner wrote:
>
>On 17/04/20 12:14 pm, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
>> On 16/04/2020 8:12 p.m., Rolf Turner wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm writing a
AFAIK, no, though if the upstream package cannot (or won't) be implemented
without that system requirement and it really is a requirement for this package
then you might want to indicate "libzzz via Package X" just to be clear for
users. If it isn't a requirement for most of your functionality
output on the command line.
>
>
>ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>Von: Jeff Newmiller [jdnew...@dcn.davis.ca.us]
>An: r-package-devel@r-project.org, Duncan Murdoch
>[murdoch.dun...@gmail.com], Stefan Lenz IMBI
>[l...@imbi.uni-freiburg.de]
>Datum
Either use the data() function to retrieve it or use the
LazyData: true
line in your DESCRIPTION file.
On April 6, 2020 11:25:21 PM PDT, jared_wood wrote:
>Dear all，
>
>I have three datasets (drugbank.rda edgar.rda mala.rda) in my package
>and I put them in the document folder which called
One could take the position that the library and require functions were a
mistake to begin with and that all contributed packages should be accessed
using ::... or one could recognize that these functions are an expected
feature of R at this point and then it is not defensible to ban the
I am just a lurker (not representing CRAN) but I am having a hard time
understanding your question.
Binary packages are a convenience for users, not a method for submitting
packages. When you have an R package accepted it is accepted in source format.
If it doesn't exclude support for Windows
from
>the general, so that an lm is a glm, not a glm is an lm. It's way too
>late to change this now, of course.
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: R-package-devel On Behalf
>Of David Hugh-Jones
>Sent: Sunday, 8 March 2020 6:28 PM
>To: Jeff Newmiller
>Cc: R pac
argument
then we are back into the generic conundrum again and the user will experience
the normal function failing to catch unused arguments.
On March 8, 2020 10:14:49 AM PDT, Jeff Newmiller
wrote:
>R encourages the use of ... particularly in S3 generics, to avoid
>over-dep
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
