Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN incoming checks email

2020-09-13 Thread Uwe Ligges
s myself) interprets this as "reply-all means replying only to". The wording in the email, on the other hand, suggests I also should reply to Uwe Ligges. I find the current disagreement of wording and email headers more than confusing. Can someone clarify th

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Should a package run without calling library?

2020-09-01 Thread Uwe Ligges
`: No, it can import from the namespace, i.e. it loads the package, but does not modify the search path (i.e. does not attach the package). Also note the workspace (=.GlobalEnv) is not the search path. Best, Uwe Ligges ``` #' Function in another package, that depends on my package

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package inputenc Error: Unicode char ‐ (U+2010) during Windows build

2020-08-27 Thread Uwe Ligges
Hyphens that, e.g., get auto generated in MS Word are non ASCII. You have to declare an appropriate encoding, or even better, replace by regular hypehsn. See functions tools:::showNonASCII tools:::showNonASCIIfile that may help to see where these are... Best, Uwe Ligges On 25.08.2020

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Error in winbuilder

2020-08-26 Thread Uwe Ligges
Pls try agaibn, if it fails again, pls let me know privately. Best, Uwe Ligges On 26.08.2020 15:13, Nicholas Tierney wrote: Hi Uwe, OK thank you for that, good to know! I imagine it might be a bit tricky to know when, but do you have an idea of when submissions might return to normal

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Error in winbuilder

2020-08-26 Thread Uwe Ligges
Friends, thias looks like a hang in the CRAN incoming feasibility checks, hence may well be some web related issue as it seems it ran into the timeout there. Best, Uwe Ligges On 26.08.2020 14:57, Nicholas Tierney wrote: Hi Michael, I do indeed have quite a few examples in the package

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Problem with V8 on CRAN Debian

2020-08-03 Thread Uwe Ligges
I have triggered new checks on the CRAN machines. Best, Uwe Ligges On 03.08.2020 16:42, Paul Buerkner wrote: Dear R community, in an effort to re-submit one of my packages (thurstonianIRT) to CRAN because of some test failures after updates of other packages, I get the following error from

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN package check gives strange error for r-release-macos-x86_x64

2020-07-14 Thread Uwe Ligges
Ideally ask Simon Urbanek who runs the Mac system. Best, Uwe Ligges On 14.07.2020 11:42, Torsten Schöps wrote: Hello, I'm trying to submit an updated version of the RPPanalyzer package, because of an upcoming maintainer change for the package. But unfortunately the update does not pass

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN submission error package newscatcheR_0.1.0

2020-07-13 Thread Uwe Ligges
No need to resubmit, we will trigger new checks. Best, Uwe Ligges On 13.07.2020 10:57, Novica Nakov wrote: Hi, Something with the ellipsis installation on the check machines seems broken, this is something for the CRAN team (which I am a member of) and will be fixed. Should I wait

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN submission error package newscatcheR_0.1.0

2020-07-13 Thread Uwe Ligges
Something with the ellipsis installation on the check machines seems broken, this is something for the CRAN team (which I am a member of) and will be fixed. Best, Uwe Ligges On 12.07.2020 17:55, Novica Nakov wrote: Hi, I tried to submit a new version of the package to CRAN today and got

Re: [R-pkg-devel] How do you Rd reference parallel::mclapply() so it works also on Windows?

2020-07-07 Thread Uwe Ligges
Not nice, but you may follow the way described in subsection "Platform-specific documentation" in WRE. Best, Uwe On 08.07.2020 03:11, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: Here's another "Non-file package-anchored link(s) ..." issue. I'd like to reference parallel::mclapply() in my help pages. With the

Re: [R-pkg-devel] data and load version 3

2020-06-29 Thread Uwe Ligges
sion 3 for the new files. Best, Uwe Ligges Thanks, Göran __ mailing list __ mailing list

Re: [R-pkg-devel] checking package dependencies ... ERROR

2020-06-25 Thread Uwe Ligges
not in mainstream repositories: actigraphy, r.jive, SpatioTemporal actigraphy is not an R cran-package, and I downloaded it from github. How could I fix that? Get the package to a maintream repository (i.e. BioC or CRAN) or you cannot depend strongly on it. Best, Uwe Ligges Thanks, Best, Wei

Re: [R-pkg-devel] email misleading: checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE Maintainer

2020-06-08 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 08.06.2020 17:02, Gábor Csárdi wrote: On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 3:58 PM Uwe Ligges wrote: [...] Nor do I how they can find out, as our idea is that CRAN cannot be special cased. If you want to run additional tests, you can execute them if some env var is set that you define on machines

Re: [R-pkg-devel] email misleading: checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE Maintainer

2020-06-08 Thread Uwe Ligges
. If you want to run additional tests, you can execute them if some env var is set that you define on machines where you want to run the additional tests. Best, Uwe Ligges   Thanks,   Spencer Graves On 2020-06-08 09:43, stefano wrote: Hello Uwe, OK sorry for that. Best wishes. *

Re: [R-pkg-devel] email misleading: checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE Maintainer

2020-06-08 Thread Uwe Ligges
for arch 'x64', Result: NOTE Examples with CPU (user + system) or elapsed time > 10s user system elapsed lower_triangular-methods 11.48 011.5 Please reduce each example to less than 5 sec. Best, Uwe Ligges Triggers an email saying 1) *pack

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Additional issues for the last version released on CRAN

2020-06-07 Thread Uwe Ligges
Right, so "reply-all and and explain: Have these been fixed?" Best, Uwe Ligges On 04.06.2020 15:16, Tiago Olivoto wrote: Dear all, I have submitted a patch release (1.6.0) of my package metan ( to fix an additional issue and impl

Re: [R-pkg-devel] win-builder failing without informative message

2020-06-02 Thread Uwe Ligges
Simply: ** running tests for arch 'i386' ... [14m] OK And the CRAN threshold for the whole package is 10 min. So only the tests for two architectures already take ~ 30 min here. which is too much for CRAN. Best, Uwe Ligges On 02.06.2020 16:13, Gábor Csárdi wrote: Seems like your tests

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Fwd: [R] a question of etiquette

2020-06-01 Thread Uwe Ligges
. Best, Uwe Ligges On 01.06.2020 23:37, R. Mark Sharp wrote: Adelchi, I have a similar situation where I had made all of the typical academic references within the code and documentation for a small but important function my package uses. I was asked by the CRAN reviewers to add the author

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Issue with submitting update of trelliscopejs to CRAN

2020-05-28 Thread Uwe Ligges
Likely a false positive, we will accept this. Best, Uwe Ligges On 28.05.2020 08:44, Ryan Hafen wrote: I submitted an update of trelliscopejs to CRAN a few days ago and received the following email: Subject: [CRAN-pretest-archived] CRAN submission trelliscopejs 0.2.5 <> p

Re: [R-pkg-devel] [BULK] Re: [Rd] "not a valid win32 application" with rtools40-x86_65.exe on Windows 10

2020-05-12 Thread Uwe Ligges
Spencer, I guess you have 64 bit components on the path before the new toolchain is found. Also check at first if you can load rJava both under 32-bit RGui and 64-bit RGui. If this does not help: Can you send me privately the full output (i.e. including check.log and also install.out

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Documentation for non-user-level objects

2020-05-10 Thread Uwe Ligges
functions in an R package. Is there any idea to remove this warning. Have you exported the function? Best, Uwe Ligges Thanks! __ mailing list

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CensSpatial package error.

2020-05-02 Thread Uwe Ligges
CL Yoiu see class(N.inv) has length > 1 hence if(cond) has a length > 1 condition and cannot deal with it (well takes only the first value), hence rewrite to, e.g., if ("try-error" %in% class(V.inv)) Best, Uwe Ligges On 02.05.2020 01:41, José Alejandro Ordoñez wrote: Good even

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Rmarkdown vignette yields r inline warning on windows build [EXT]

2020-05-02 Thread Uwe Ligges
My wild guess is that 'r ' indicates there is an invisible char after the r that is not representable in the chosen encoding. Best, Uwe Ligges On 02.05.2020 01:12, Matthew Young wrote: I’ve tried both ways (with and without a space after the backtick) and get the same error. From: Max

Re: [R-pkg-devel] exit and 'stderr' warning

2020-04-29 Thread Uwe Ligges
' and 'stderr'. In this case, how can I avoid this warning? Not use those calls, see Writing R Extensions. Best, Uwe Ligges Thanks, --Sameh [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ mailing list

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Problems importing packages with SystemRequirements

2020-04-28 Thread Uwe Ligges
, CRAN reports issues for system calls (made by `git2r` and `whoami`, I guess) for my package on r-patched-solaris-x86 only, so I am not sure how to reproduce them. Yes, but as SystemRequirements are not alsways fullfilled, you should test whether these are available before use. Best, Uwe Ligges

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Appropriate keyword in help file.

2020-04-17 Thread Uwe Ligges
keywords are not mandatory. You can invent your own keywords and use them in \concept{} entries. Best, Uwe Ligges On 17.04.2020 02:57, Jeff Newmiller wrote: You can get away with a lot if you are not distributing your package. But I usually try to satisfy R CMD check at least. On April

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Detritus in temp directory - Note from submission of R package in CRAN

2020-04-16 Thread Uwe Ligges
that. Or better create it in tempdir(): I guess you used paste(tempdir(), ...) instead of file.path() and got afilename one level above tempdir()? Best, Uwe Ligges Duncan Murdoch __ mailing list

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Windows specific install error

2020-04-14 Thread Uwe Ligges
Yes, should be fixed by tmorrow, Uwe On 08.04.2020 00:16, Martin Morgan wrote: This is the same as and due I believe to stale packages on the CRAN windows builder; the solution is I believe on the CRAN side. Martin Morgan

Re: [R-pkg-devel] manual inspection of new packages

2020-04-14 Thread Uwe Ligges
I just looked, you got a repsonse from Swetlana Herbrandt on Dec 16. Will forward privately. Best, Uwe Ligges On 10.04.2020 05:08, John Lawson wrote: Ok, thanks. On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 1:46 PM Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 09/04/2020 3:28 p.m., John Lawson wrote: I submitted the Package

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Failing incoming tests on 'stringsAsFactors = TRUE'

2020-03-31 Thread Uwe Ligges
Actually we had the Windows platform for incomign tests on stringsAsFactors = TRUE for checking back compatibility to older versions of R, but this is no longer possible for new versions of R-devel. Can you pls simply resubmit the same version? Best, Uwe Ligges On 31.03.2020 03:07, Duncan

Re: [R-pkg-devel] System requirements of a vignette engine

2020-03-30 Thread Uwe Ligges
Pls write to Best, Uwe Ligges On 30.03.2020 01:09, wrote: Dear All, inspired by Karl Broman`s reader on using 'knitr' with 'asciidoc' (, I wrote package rasciidoc some time ago. It is just a wrapper

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Warning in dir.create(vd2 <- "vign_test"): 'vign_test' already exists

2020-03-16 Thread Uwe Ligges
  'vign_test' already exists I do not get it when checking your package. Best, Uwe Ligges   Under macOS 10.15.3 it finishes fine.   "grep 'vign_test'" failed to find anything.   ???   Thanks,   Spencer Graves p.s.  Running R 3.6.3 on both m

Re: [R-pkg-devel] An invalid URLs

2020-03-16 Thread Uwe Ligges
the paranoid nature of the website's security system, it's hard to offer a good solution to your problem: linking to it may place people running R CMD check into temporary ban, while not linking to it does not seem polite. Well, then mention the URL in plain text but not link Best, Uwe Ligges

Re: [R-pkg-devel] packaging biosig for R

2020-03-16 Thread Uwe Ligges
its own rules; you might want to ask there, given the subject matter of your package. Thanks, Duncan, same from here, just to confrim from a "part of CRAN" point of view. Best, Uwe Ligges Duncan Murdoch Alois Schlögl [1] Am 3/16/20

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Examples for functions called by Shiny server

2020-03-16 Thread Uwe Ligges
defined in ./R. I haven't looked at the details, but if you fullfilled tjhe above, please simply resubmit or in case you do not need to change anytrhing, simply say so and respond to the CRAN team member CCing cran-submissions@... Best, Uwe Ligges On 16.03.2020 05:22, R. Mark Sharp wrote: I

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package windows binaries not updating?

2020-03-11 Thread Uwe Ligges
Sorry, takes longer as I we use a lot of COU cychecking ... Uwe On 11.03.2020 15:23, Joe Thorley wrote: Hi All Version 0.4.0 of the chk package was accepted by CRAN over a week ago (on March 3rd 2020). However, the windows binaries have not yet updated for r-devel and r-release.

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Fwd: Re: [CRAN-pretest-archived] CRAN submission SSLR 0.9.0

2020-03-10 Thread Uwe Ligges
I do not speak roxygen, but you have to register the S3 method. Best, Uwe Ligges On 10.03.2020 17:28, wrote: Hi, I thiks its weird: The error is:  no applicable method for 'fit' applied to an object of class "model_sslr" In the code: #' fit #' #' @title

Re: [R-pkg-devel] package daewr does not pass incoming checks automatically

2020-03-10 Thread Uwe Ligges
We do not accept submissions that strongnly depend on orphaned packages as these are subject to be archived from CRAN. Best, Uwe Ligges On 10.03.2020 17:48, John Lawson wrote: The package daewr contains the data sets and functions shown in the book "Design and Analysis of Experiments w

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package in 'sugests' archived

2020-03-10 Thread Uwe Ligges
Please simply submit a new version ideally without sugesting the archived one as you apparently do not need it for your paclkage's functionality at all. Best, Uwe Ligges On 09.03.2020 10:43, Fabio Corradini Santander wrote: Hi, I recently submitted my frist package to CRAN ( https://CRAN.R

Re: [R-pkg-devel] [FORGED] Re: Help on Windows CRAN Check

2020-03-05 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 05.03.2020 09:45, Rolf Turner wrote: On 5/03/20 9:04 pm, Tomas Kalibera wrote: On 3/5/20 4:26 AM, John Lawson wrote: I see this error on the CRAN Check report Fatal error: the condition has length > 1 The problem is that the condition t1 == "I" & t2 == "(" of the if statement in

Re: [R-pkg-devel] [FORGED] Re: win-builder down?

2020-03-01 Thread Uwe Ligges
ed, as people also use winbuilder for the check results these days, I will remove that sentence. The queues were stuck due to some processes that the watchdog was not able to kill entirely. Now oen and rnnign again. Best, Uwe Ligges __ mailing list

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Error in curl: Failed FTP upload: 550

2020-02-21 Thread Uwe Ligges
Yes, queue is stuck, will be cleared up by tomorrow, Uwe Ligges On 21.02.2020 18:01, Gianmarco Alberti wrote: Thank you. So, it’s better to wait for few days? Best Gm Dr Gianmarco Alberti (PhD Udine) Lecturer in Spatial Forensics Coordinator

[R-pkg-devel] winbuilder + CRAN incoming checkes offline for 30 hours from now

2020-02-14 Thread Uwe Ligges
incoming checks: You can well submit further on, but submissions won't be auto processed for that time. Best, Uwe Ligges __ mailing list

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Default number of cores <=2

2020-02-09 Thread Uwe Ligges
voidable that for users to exploit multiple cores they must specify a non-default function argument, or similar? Exactly. Best, Uwe Ligges __ mailing list

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Winbuilder 'experimental' toolchain 4-5x slower than all other architectures

2020-02-05 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 05.02.2020 16:42, Uwe Ligges wrote: Then this is specific to your package, I meant the new one, not the one on CRAN which is also similarly quick (less than 10% difference). Best, Uwe Ligges see the overall timings for the whole CRAN check:

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Winbuilder 'experimental' toolchain 4-5x slower than all other architectures

2020-02-05 Thread Uwe Ligges
even be the other way round. And for PerformanceAnalytics I get overall 418 sec for old and 446 sec (without vignettes each) for the new toolchain (again, load may have varied): Best, Uwe Ligges On 05.02.2020 16

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Conditionally use packages from Bioconductor

2020-02-05 Thread Uwe Ligges
ges/release/bioc/html/M3C.html). BioC is a standard repository that you do not need to delcare. Best, Uwe Ligges Would this be the correct way to conditionally use a package from Bioconductor in own packages? Best Daniel -- _

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Warning: parse error in file 'Rraven-Ex.R'

2020-02-05 Thread Uwe Ligges
t; ... Where you probably have \. and need \\. Best, Uwe Ligges However, I can't find the original file where the error is found. I have try unsuccessfully for several hours :( any suggestions on how to find it? thanks! Marcelo El mar., 4 feb. 2020 a las 8:34, Dirk Eddelbuettel () es

Re: [R-pkg-devel] r-hub status

2020-02-04 Thread Uwe Ligges
but no function listed in the \usage section uses '...'. The question is why you don't always get that warning. Because there was a bug in R that the warnings was not produced for a long time, and this is now fixed in recent verisons of R-devel. Hence ou only get it here. Best, Uwe Ligges Bill

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Unable to reproduce reported problems. Docker image?

2020-01-30 Thread Uwe Ligges
No, for Windows you may use winbuilder that comes very close. More generally you can try r-hub for all OSes, but that is less close. Best, Uwe Ligges On 30.01.2020 22:40, Borini, Stefano wrote: I am currently trying to submit a package to CRAN, and I see no problems in running the test

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN cannot find libraries on Windows

2020-01-27 Thread Uwe Ligges
-lrtmp -lssl -lssh2 -lcrypto -lgdi32 -lz -lws2_32 -lwldap32 -lwinmm and that is wrong as -LC:/extsoft/lib/i386 or C:/extsoft/lib/x64 are not directories where the software is installed on winbuilder. Pls use the directories the other packages are using, too. Best, Uwe Ligges On 26.

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Note about "marked UTF-8 strings" when checking with R-devel

2020-01-27 Thread Uwe Ligges
78 marked UTF-8 strings* Fine for CRAN. Best, Uwe Ligges The package has been on CRAN for years now, and it's the first time I get this note. Checking with R 3.6.2, I still get: checking data for non-ASCII characters ... OK The package contains 4 sample data frames, two of which

Re: [R-pkg-devel] [CRAN-pretest-archived] CRAN submission EventDetectR 0.3.4

2020-01-23 Thread Uwe Ligges
field from the Authors@R field and indert the person with cre role as maintainer. Please fix and resubmit. Best, Uwe Ligges On 23.01.2020 15:21, Sowmya C wrote: Dear CRAN/DEVEL Team, I am looking forward for kind reply. The two NOTEs are intended changes that we made and I think

Re: [R-pkg-devel] RES: RES: Possible unknown color in r

2020-01-12 Thread Uwe Ligges
Don't worry, this is an issue that trhe CRAN incoimng checks have not uncovered with a new farvber version. As we found the breakage later in regular checks, the farver package has been rolled back on CRAN, hence pls simpy ignore the problem for your own packages. Best, Uwe Ligges

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN Package Check ERROR involving stringi

2020-01-12 Thread Uwe Ligges
Probably some race condition. Simply submit a new versin. Best, Uwe Ligges On 11.01.2020 03:10, Chris Brien wrote: Hi list members, On checking the CRAN Package Check Results for my package growthPheno I find that there is the error below for r-devel-windows-ix86+x86_64, but not for r

Re: [R-pkg-devel] R package fails examples and tests on Windows i386

2019-12-30 Thread Uwe Ligges
My guess is that you have nmot properly closed open connections? Best, Uwe Ligges On 29.12.2019 05:30, Artem Klevtsov wrote: Hello, The package is R bindings of the uap-cpp library using Rcpp. Package also includes re2 and yaml-cpp libs (included in the source tree and built with Makevars

Re: [R-pkg-devel] DOI in of package in DESCRIPTION file

2019-12-16 Thread Uwe Ligges
.3229615 and we do not have a field fo it, but you can cite it within the Description field and link to it via a sentence and DOI such as: "See R.M. Krug and O. Petchey (2019) ." Best, Uwe Ligges To the DESCRIPTION file. This raises not an error during check, but tells me,

Re: [R-pkg-devel] RES: Time for CRAN response

2019-12-15 Thread Uwe Ligges
esssages we receive. That one has now been answered. 2. I do not see a submission fom Nov 25. Can you simply resubmit and make sure you click on the confirmation link? Best, Uwe Ligges Duncan Murdoch Best, Tiago Olivoto -Mensagem original- De: Duncan Murdoch Enviada em: domingo

Re: [R-pkg-devel] r2sundials submission failure

2019-12-15 Thread Uwe Ligges
Have you tried to write to CRAN@... and ask if thirs party software can be installed on CRAN? Best, Uwe Ligges On 11.12.2019 10:39, Serguei Sokol wrote: Hi, I have tried to submit my new package to CRAN but submission seems to be dismissed. The package

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Large Data Package CRAN Preferences

2019-12-15 Thread Uwe Ligges
Ideally yoiu wpuld host the data elsewhere and submit a CRAN package that allows users to easily get/merge/aggregate the data. Best, Uwe Ligges On 12.12.2019 20:55, wrote: Hello, I have two questions about creating data packages for data that will be updated

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Issue with Biostrings-- can't find the base rgb function on r-devel

2019-12-05 Thread Uwe Ligges
That was a bug in Biostrings that has been fixed in the meantime. Best, Uwe Ligges On 05.12.2019 05:19, Hugh Parsonage wrote: rgb is from package grDevices not package base. On Thu, 5 Dec 2019 at 2:48 pm, Dalgleish, James (NIH/NCI) [V] via R-package-devel wrote: Question: NIPTeR

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Fix non-ASCII characters in R packages

2019-12-02 Thread Uwe Ligges
likely included in error. See section 'Package structure' in the 'Writing R Extensions' manual. Best, Uwe Ligges On 02.12.2019 18:46, Rafael Pereira wrote: Thanks for the heads up, Ivan. In any case, I’ll change the encoding of the database. Uwe, I’m faxing this issue in the geobr package

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Fix non-ASCII characters in R packages

2019-12-02 Thread Uwe Ligges
h packages is this? Best, Uwe Ligges I have used to code below to identify my scripts that have strings using non-ASCII characters. The problem is that in most cases these non-ASCII characters are used in the documentation of functions, so I cannot simply convert their encoding using iconv() for examp

Re: [R-pkg-devel] casen 0.1: strange pre-test results

2019-11-30 Thread Uwe Ligges
Pls ignore the knitr et all missings for now, some hicc up on the check machine caused an inconsistent setup. We will fix this shortly. Best, Uwe Ligges On 01.12.2019 00:06, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: On 30 November 2019 at 18:29, Mauricio Vargas wrote: | This is the 1st time that the pre

Re: [R-pkg-devel] how to change from -fsanitize=undefined to -fsanitize=address

2019-11-29 Thread Uwe Ligges
See section 4.3.3 "Using the Address Sanitizer" in Writing R Extensions. Best, Uwe Ligges On 29.11.2019 17:58, Youyi Fong wrote: Hello, I would like to reproduce this error locally: I followed the tutori

Re: [R-pkg-devel] R CMD check: Titles in README

2019-11-28 Thread Uwe Ligges
We had to install the most recent pandoc release as the old failed for the recent texlive release with rmarkdown. Apparently pandoc gives a different error message for empty titles now. The simplest solution would be to provide a proper title anyway. Best, Uwe Ligges On 27.11.2019 22:33

Re: [R-pkg-devel] compression of vignettes

2019-11-25 Thread Uwe Ligges
a package with the above size of (uncompressed) directories. Best, Uwe Ligges   Suggestions?   Thanks,   Spencer Graves On 2019-11-21 11:43, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: On 21 November 2019 at 16:43, Joris Meys wrote: | The workflow as described in the manual : | https://cr

Re: [R-pkg-devel] checking for detritus finds unfamiliar files

2019-11-10 Thread Uwe Ligges
this is likely a false positive. Best, Uwe Ligges Thank you, Pere Millán-Martínez [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ mailing list

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Status of macOS binaries

2019-11-05 Thread Uwe Ligges
Can you pls send a message to Simon? Best, Uwe Ligges On 05.11.2019 14:38, Lionel Henry wrote: Hello, rlang 0.4.1 was released on 24th of October, but the macOS binaries haven't been distributed yet. Is the binary service down? I also see the check results for macOS haven't been published

Re: [R-pkg-devel] install.R running out of memory

2019-11-03 Thread Uwe Ligges
What happens if you disable byte code compilation? Best, Uwe Ligges On 02.11.2019 19:37, Viktor Gal wrote: Hi Dirk, no worries, thnx for the feedback! cheers, viktor On 2 Nov 2019, at 13:58, Viktor Gal wrote: Hi Dirk, so the project is open source, you can reproduce the error yourself

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Solaris package installed size

2019-10-15 Thread Uwe Ligges
Well, binaries may well have different sizes on different platforms, aslo when statically linkd vs dynamically linked etc. In this case, you should not worry. Best, Uwe Ligges On 15.10.2019 18:46, Dalgleish, James (NIH/NCI) [V] via R-package-devel wrote: On Solaris, I'm finding that my

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Tarball can't be unpacked

2019-10-14 Thread Uwe Ligges
before. Nobody reported this so far. Apparently my cron service died and no on demand checks have been performed since saturday. I restarted cron now, but it will take a while to process the queues. Best, Uwe Ligges Same for R-devel. Permission problems? Thanks, -Roy On Oct 14, 2019

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Tarball can't be unpacked

2019-10-14 Thread Uwe Ligges
Please resubmit, we had a space problem oin the check machine. Best, Uwe Ligges On 13.10.2019 07:00, Dalgleish, James (NIH/NCI) [V] via R-package-devel wrote: * using log directory 'd:/RCompile/CRANincoming/R-devel/CNVScope.Rcheck' * using R Under development (unstable) (2019-10-10 r77275

Re: [R-pkg-devel] consider running tools::compactPDF(gs_quality = "ebook")

2019-10-10 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 10.10.2019 15:41, Juhee Lee wrote: Then, is there no way I can fix it? Well we do not see any problems, so pls resubmit and the CRAN team will tell you what problems are still apparent. Best, Uwe Ligges Thank you. Juhee Lee 2019년 10월 6일 (일) 오후 8:57, Duncan Murdoch 님이 작성: On 06

Re: [R-pkg-devel] consider running tools::compactPDF(gs_quality = "ebook")

2019-10-02 Thread Uwe Ligges
calling R CMD build?  Is it rebuilt by R CMD build? ... and are ghostscript and qpdf on your PATH so that R picks it up? Best, Uwe Ligges Duncan Murdoch Best regards Juhee Lee. --- Sys.which(Sys.getenv("R_GSCMD")) C:\\Program Files\\gs\\gs

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Number of cores in examples

2019-09-15 Thread Uwe Ligges
given there are dozens of new submissions on a single day. Best, Uwe Ligges On 15.09.2019 19:49, John Harrold wrote: Hello Max, The comment I received was: Please ensure that you do not use more than 2 cores in your examples. I believe the only output I received was these incoming pretest

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Number of cores in examples

2019-09-15 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 15.09.2019 05:39, John Harrold wrote: Thanks Uwe, Is there a way to find out on my end where this is happening? Yes, simply set the env var _R_CHECK_LIMIT_CORES_=true to reproduce. Best, Uwe Thanks john On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 10:51 PM Uwe Ligges <mailto:lig...@statistik

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Number of cores in examples

2019-09-13 Thread Uwe Ligges
that requires doParallel or was this triggered because one of my examples actually used more than 2 cores? The latter. In examples, vignettes and tests you must not start more than 2 workers as resources for CRAN checks are limited. Best, Uwe Ligges Thanks John

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Add reference in Description

2019-09-09 Thread Uwe Ligges
). Then one gets an HTTP 404. All true, just le to me add: CRAN sends many requests to these sites a day, hence they may reject CRAN traffic, which you can simply ignore. Best, Uwe Ligges How do I modify it? You can't. Be patient. As stated in the note, wait for a member of CRAN to check

Re: [R-pkg-devel] DESCRIPTION file errors

2019-09-04 Thread Uwe Ligges
e the links via the (ideally stable) DOI as in . Best, Uwe Ligges Thank you in advance for any help. Eric [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ mailing list

Re: [R-pkg-devel] question about "checking for non-standard things in the check directory"

2019-09-03 Thread Uwe Ligges
that these files are created  in the check directory when running the examples, but I don't understand what's the matter with this? because you must not write to the user filespace in examples as detailed in the CRAN policies. Please rather write to tempdir() in examples. Best, Uwe Ligges What should

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Misspelled words in DESCRIPTION

2019-08-19 Thread Uwe Ligges
Simply submit as it is, false positives in spell checks will be confirmed in the submission process by a CRAN team member when they appear the first time in the package. Best, Uwe Ligges On 20.08.2019 00:13, John Harrold wrote: Hello, I am attempting to submit my first package to CRAN. I

[R-pkg-devel] CRAN incoming queue closed from Aug 09 to Aug 18

2019-08-05 Thread Uwe Ligges
Dear package developers, the CRAN incoming queue will be closed from Aug 09, 2019 to Aug 18, 2019. Hence package submissions are only possible before and after that period. CRAN maintainance work and some work on a possibly forthcoming Windows toolchain will be pushed forward. Best, Uwe

Re: [R-pkg-devel] "Additional issues" show WRITE outside an array

2019-07-26 Thread Uwe Ligges
Checks with address sanitizers have to be done with instrumnted R versions and take a long time, hence we run these checks less frequently and only under one platform (here Linux for simplicity). Best, Uwe Ligges On 26.07.2019 08:50, Jiahuan ye wrote: Hi, Recently, my first r package

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Example fails in check

2019-07-26 Thread Uwe Ligges
I'd suggest not to use pipes in package code, as the parser does not know about them and hence debugging, error messages are more obfuscated. Why not use he functional way of R? For the question: I guess you do not have a corresponding entry in the NAMESPACE file? Best, Uwe On

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Maintainer a Group

2019-06-26 Thread Uwe Ligges
Thanks, a good example for the case at hand, where it again does not help that there is a mailing list, but apparently nobody feels responsible and the CRAN team had to fix the package twice already. Best, Uwe Ligges On 26.06.2019 03:00, Dario Strbenac wrote: Good day, What about the CRAN

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Maintainer a Group

2019-06-25 Thread Uwe Ligges
The CRAN team has very bad experiences in the past when various people of research groups reponded with non coordinated answers. Hence the decision was made that we only want to talk to a dedicated maintainer who is responsible for the submission. And we want to know who that is. Best, Uwe

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Maintainer a Group

2019-06-25 Thread Uwe Ligges
Yes, it is. Best, Uwe Ligges On 26.06.2019 00:00, John Muschelli wrote: Understood, thanks for the clarification.  Is it acceptable to have gmail tagged emails such as <> for different packages (such as fslr)? Best, John

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Another CRAN-only bug

2019-06-13 Thread Uwe Ligges
Use winbuilder. Best, Uwe Ligges On 13.06.2019 10:40, David Hugh-Jones wrote:  Well, the test that fails is this one: The last line fails here

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Another CRAN-only bug

2019-06-13 Thread Uwe Ligges
test was. Best, Uwe Ligges On 13.06.2019 06:59, David Hugh-Jones wrote: Hi Duncan, Of course I appreciate the value of a centralised repository, and I acknowledge the hard work that goes into maintaining it. That does not mean that it should be beyond criticism. I wrote out of frustration

Re: [R-pkg-devel] R CMD build: "Error in if (any(update))"

2019-06-12 Thread Uwe Ligges
Too many layers of complexity for me, can you take the package sources and zat /or zip) them for me and send them? Then I'll take a look. Best, Uwe Ligges On 12.06.2019 08:23, Rob Foxall wrote: Thanks. I ran in R: devtools::build("myPackage") That gave me a warning: NB: this p

Re: [R-pkg-devel] try() in R CMD check --as-cran

2019-06-07 Thread Uwe Ligges
Right, what problem are you talking about? Can you tell us which check it is and what it actually complained about. There is no check that looks at the sizes of x and y in exypressions such as (x - y)^2. as far as I know. Best, Uwe On 07.06.2019 10:33, Berry Boessenkool wrote: Not entirely

Re: [R-pkg-devel] checks on CRAN notes 'examples_i386', but checks elsewhere do not

2019-06-07 Thread Uwe Ligges
Or you have been there at the wrong time when we enabled a new check that was not able to correctly deal with check directories produced under bi-arch check siutuations. This is fixed for wionbuilder and wil be fixed in the R sources soon, Uwe On 07.06.2019 09:31, Georgi Boshnakov wrote:

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Cran check on Solaris

2019-05-28 Thread Uwe Ligges
Yes, soem hicc up caused som lost dlls on winbuilder. It is currently rebuilding the full set of CRAN packages and will finish within the next 8 hours. Best, Uwe Ligges On 28.05.2019 20:57, Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal via R-package-devel wrote: I have been having similar problems

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN submission and the staged installation false positive check

2019-05-23 Thread Uwe Ligges
The bug is identified and will be fixed shortly. All maintainers affected by this bug may send me a message so that we can re-inspect your submissions. These affected only maintainers with packages that need the --merge-multiarch flag. Best, Uwe Ligges On 16.05.2019 19:06, Gábor Csárdi

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Rstan invalid connection on winbuilder

2019-05-21 Thread Uwe Ligges
As the maintainer of winbuilder I am happy to help, but without the name of the package nor any reference to any check log and information whether this happened once or more than once, I really cannot help Best, Uwe Ligges On 21.05.2019 11:40, Jendoubi Bedhiafi, Takoua wrote: Dear all

Re: [R-pkg-devel] WInbuilder and rHub updating

2019-05-21 Thread Uwe Ligges
For winbuilder and general incoming check services: New packages on CRAN should be directly available for incoming checks, perhaps with some short technical delays of less than one hour. For winbuilder on demand checks, there may be a lag of 2 days. Requests may be considered. Best, Uwe

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Check Results ERROR on Windows R release

2019-05-17 Thread Uwe Ligges
Yes, looks like some race condition, just wait a day or two. Best, Uwe Ligges On 17.05.2019 18:52, Iñaki Ucar wrote: On Fri, 17 May 2019 at 18:05, Jarrett Phillips wrote: Hello, On submitting an update of my R package (HACSim), checks fail on r-release-windows-ix86+x86_64 <https://ww

Re: [R-pkg-devel] noL

2019-05-16 Thread Uwe Ligges
From : "tests on x86_64 Linux with R-devel configured --disable-long-double" in order to mimick platforms without support for long doubles. Best, Uwe Ligges On 16.05.2019 15:31, Goldfeld, Keith wrote: Good morning - I have

Re: [R-pkg-devel] noLD error in CRAN checks in package 'HACSim'

2019-05-15 Thread Uwe Ligges
probs must sum to 1" and that is not exactly true on platforms without long doubles. You can test for that via all.equal(), perhaps you have to adjust the tolerance. Best, Uwe Ligges - * checking examples ... ERROR Running examples in ‘HACSim-Ex.R’ failed The error most likel

  1   2   3   4   >