Re: [R-pkg-devel] Additional issues for the last version released on CRAN

2020-06-07 Thread Uwe Ligges 

Right, so "reply-all and and explain: Have these been fixed?"

Best,
Uwe Ligges

On 04.06.2020 15:16, Tiago Olivoto wrote:

Dear all,

I have submitted a patch release (1.6.0) of my package metan
(https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/metan/) to fix an additional issue
and implement some improvements. All local checks had no errors or warnings,
but after the submission process, I received the following message.

  


<<>>

  


Dear maintainer,

package metan_1.6.1.tar.gz has been auto-processed.

The auto-check found additional issues for the *last* version released on
CRAN:

   donttest < 
https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/bdr/donttest/metan.out>

CRAN incoming checks do not test for these additional issues and you will
need an appropriately instrumented build of R to reproduce these.

Hence please reply-all and explain: Have these been fixed?

Log dir:


The files will be removed after roughly 7 days.

Installation time in seconds: 52

Check time in seconds: 407

R Under development (unstable) (2020-05-29 r78617)

Pretests results:

Windows: <

https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/metan_1.6.1_20200603_0626
35/Windows/00check.log>

Status: OK

Debian: <

https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/metan_1.6.1_20200603_0626
35/Debian/00check.log>

Status: OK

Last released version's CRAN status: OK: 12

See: < 
https://CRAN.R-project.org/web/checks/check_results_metan.html>

Last released version's additional issues:

   donttest < 
https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/bdr/donttest/metan.out>

CRAN Web: < 
https://cran.r-project.org/package=metan>

No strong reverse dependencies to be checked.

  


<<>>

  


I replied to mailto:cran-submissi...@r-project.org> >  explaining how the error was
fixed, but since this is my first experience with an issue like that, I'm
not sure if I need to do anything more or simply await a response from the
CRAN team.

Thanks in advance for any comments or suggestion,

Tiago

  



[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel



__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

[R-pkg-devel] Additional issues for the last version released on CRAN

2020-06-04 Thread Tiago Olivoto 
Dear all,

I have submitted a patch release (1.6.0) of my package metan
(https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/metan/) to fix an additional issue
and implement some improvements. All local checks had no errors or warnings,
but after the submission process, I received the following message.

 

<<>>

 

Dear maintainer,

package metan_1.6.1.tar.gz has been auto-processed.

The auto-check found additional issues for the *last* version released on
CRAN:

  donttest < 
https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/bdr/donttest/metan.out>

CRAN incoming checks do not test for these additional issues and you will
need an appropriately instrumented build of R to reproduce these.

Hence please reply-all and explain: Have these been fixed?

Log dir:


The files will be removed after roughly 7 days.

Installation time in seconds: 52

Check time in seconds: 407 

R Under development (unstable) (2020-05-29 r78617)

Pretests results:

Windows: <

https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/metan_1.6.1_20200603_0626
35/Windows/00check.log>

Status: OK

Debian: <

https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/metan_1.6.1_20200603_0626
35/Debian/00check.log>

Status: OK

Last released version's CRAN status: OK: 12

See: < 
https://CRAN.R-project.org/web/checks/check_results_metan.html>

Last released version's additional issues:

  donttest < 
https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/bdr/donttest/metan.out>

CRAN Web: < 
https://cran.r-project.org/package=metan>

No strong reverse dependencies to be checked.

 

<<>>

 

I replied to mailto:cran-submissi...@r-project.org> >  explaining how the error was
fixed, but since this is my first experience with an issue like that, I'm
not sure if I need to do anything more or simply await a response from the
CRAN team.

Thanks in advance for any comments or suggestion,

Tiago

 


[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel