Re: [R-pkg-devel] Development Testers?

2016-02-09 Thread Martin Maechler
> Charles Determan > on Sat, 6 Feb 2016 10:33:03 -0600 writes: > Thanks Boris, My main concern I suppose is if this mailing > list is appropriate to occasionally solicit additional > testers. Just curious what people (i.e. Admins) would > think about using the list f

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Development Testers?

2016-02-07 Thread Boris Steipe
Of course I can speak only for myself, but I'd help out if asked and I think in general you'll find people here to be a pretty helpful bunch. Cheers, Boris On Feb 5, 2016, at 8:30 AM, Charles Determan wrote: > I'm not sure if this question is appropriate for the R mailing lists but > I'm not

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Development Testers?

2016-02-06 Thread Charles Determan
Thanks Boris, My main concern I suppose is if this mailing list is appropriate to occasionally solicit additional testers. Just curious what people (i.e. Admins) would think about using the list for such a purpose. Regards, Charles On Friday, February 5, 2016, Boris Steipe wrote: > Of course

[R-pkg-devel] Development Testers?

2016-02-05 Thread Charles Determan
I'm not sure if this question is appropriate for the R mailing lists but I'm not sure where else to ask. I am wondering if there is any means by which package authors can solicit testers for a package. I believe this is often referred to as 'crowd sourced testing'. I am aware of continuous integ