William,
I use the Authors@R field to include my ORCID in this package:
https://github.com/jasonserviss/ClusterSignificance/blob/master/DESCRIPTION
and get no notes (concerning that anyway) on windows
(https://www.bioconductor.org/checkResults/3.6/bioc-LATEST/ClusterSignificance/tokay1-checksrc
Uwe,
Thanks. I was hoping that you would say that.
Bill
> On Feb 25, 2018, at 5:55 PM, Uwe Ligges
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 26.02.2018 00:39, William Revelle wrote:
>> I did remove the author and maintainer fields. I have only the Authors@R
>> field. However it still throws that Note (in R 3.
On 26.02.2018 00:39, William Revelle wrote:
I did remove the author and maintainer fields. I have only the Authors@R field.
However it still throws that Note (in R 3.4.3)
Ignore it. R-3.4.3 doid not know about the ORCID feature, hence goves
this note.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On Feb 25, 20
I did remove the author and maintainer fields. I have only the Authors@R field.
However it still throws that Note (in R 3.4.3)
> On Feb 25, 2018, at 5:20 PM, Iñaki Úcar wrote:
>
> 2018-02-25 23:49 GMT+01:00 William Revelle :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to take advantage of the Authors@R: field i
2018-02-25 23:49 GMT+01:00 William Revelle :
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to take advantage of the Authors@R: field in my description file
> for the psych package to add an ORCID address (as discussed in the R journal).
>
> When I R CMD check with R development on my Mac, or with win builder it
> passes
Hi,
I am trying to take advantage of the Authors@R: field in my description file
for the psych package to add an ORCID address (as discussed in the R journal).
When I R CMD check with R development on my Mac, or with win builder it passes
all checks. (R Under development (unstable) (2018-02-23
