Re: [R-pkg-devel] FW: CRAN submission berryFunctions 1.8.0

2015-06-03 Thread Uwe Ligges
before submitting. Why did the latest Rdevel (2015-06-01 r68455) CMD check --as-cran not find them? Your R was not libcurl enabled nor had you the spellchecker installed, I guess. Best, Uwe Ligges Below are the relevant excerpts. Thanks for any hints about what I may have done wrong, Berry

Re: [R-pkg-devel] package in 'Enhances' not in a repository

2015-07-01 Thread Uwe Ligges
they have to e-mail me regarding this point? Please explain in your submission comment that the web address is provided in the Description of the package and use the full URL (inlcuding http://;). Best, Uwe Ligges I should say that most of the functionality and purpose of the nadiv package

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Running tests on 32-bit and 64-bit

2015-08-17 Thread Uwe Ligges
Use winbuilder, it runs 32-bit and 64-bit R tests on a Windows 64-bit platform. Not sure how you implemented the different precisions, but just go ahead and try on winbiulder. Best, Uwe Ligges On 17.08.2015 11:03, Thierry Onkelinx wrote: Dear all, Is there an easy way to run the tests

Re: [R-pkg-devel] no visible global function definition

2015-06-29 Thread Uwe Ligges
Most of this has been answered by others already. Note that package base itself is always imported into the Namespace but names from the other packages are not and really need to be if actually used. Best, Uwe Ligges On 29.06.2015 19:09, Kevin Ushey wrote: Hi Uwe, It seems like

Re: [R-pkg-devel] dplyr usage inside another package

2015-08-10 Thread Uwe Ligges
::matches even work when it is not an exported function?) If it is any package you use in private you can use triple colons. If you want the package to be published on CRAN, then you must not use non-exported functions (hence not in the API of the package). Best, Uwe Ligges Thanks, Jon

Re: [R-pkg-devel] checking S3 generic/method consistency ... NOTE‏

2015-07-23 Thread Uwe Ligges
have: checking S3 generic/method consistency ... NOTE Found the following apparent S3 methods exported but not registered: head.SQLiteConnection So register it as an S3 method in your NAMESPACE file. Best, Uwe Ligges #' Return the first n elements of a SQLiteConnection object

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Packages from other maintainers with win-builder

2015-07-21 Thread Uwe Ligges
Sounds like a good proposal, but currently this is not implemented. Best, Uwe Ligges On 22.07.2015 01:10, François Michonneau wrote: Hello all, As I can only easily access computers with Linux, I am very grateful for the existence of win-builder to test my packages with Windows. Today

Re: [R-pkg-devel] renaming a package

2015-07-19 Thread Uwe Ligges
not many maintainers succeeded to get us convinced... Best, Uwe Ligges Duncan Murdoch __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel __ R-package-devel@r

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Problem with Description File

2015-08-30 Thread Uwe Ligges
a DESCRIPTION file so cannot be built as a package. Is it spelled all upper case? Do you have read permission? If on Windows: Is there some hidden filname extension? Best, Uwe Ligges Glenn __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch

Re: [R-pkg-devel] R CMD check for a package which depends on not installed other package

2015-08-26 Thread Uwe Ligges
as a library as well in the command, or should I define a .Rprofile in the current diractory? What is the best approach in such a situation? Install into that other library and temporarily set R_LIBS_USER that points to that additional library. Best, Uwe Ligges Thanks, Rainer

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Winbuilder build error on r-release due to lazy loading

2015-09-04 Thread Uwe Ligges
Please try again now. Best, Uwe Ligges On 04.09.2015 20:59, Benjamin Leutner wrote: To supplement my previous email: here is a link to the source bundle if that helps https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bleutner/RStoolbox/gh-pages/RStoolbox_0.1.0.tar.gz On 04.09.2015 10:34, Benjamin Leutner

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Submit second version of R package to CRAN

2016-06-05 Thread Uwe Ligges
I do not know devtools: If it worked for you for the initial submission and the CRAN team did not complain, please resubmit in the same way - and keep in mind you want to check the package in advance using a very recent version of R. Best, Uwe Ligges On 04.06.2016 18:49, Luck Buttered wrote

Re: [R-pkg-devel] double colon

2016-01-29 Thread Uwe Ligges
. If Answer1==YES: Should I also refer to other functions within my own package through myPackage::otherFunction? Yes, *if* you only suggest the package and do not import from the namespace unconditionally, you should do that. Best, Uwe Ligges Should I do that for base packages like graphics

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package fails to build on Windows only, builds on GNU/Linux (parse issue)

2016-02-03 Thread Uwe Ligges
dows I see a string which seems to start: lower case i possibly with an umlaut closing guillemet inverted question mark hash symbol I guess the file is UTF-8 encoded and you read it under Windows as latin1 or therelike, so declare an encoding. Best, Uwe Ligges whereas the GNU/Linux exam

Re: [R-pkg-devel] checking PDF version of manual

2016-01-31 Thread Uwe Ligges
e winbuilder service to verify - it also uses MikTeX 2.9 ... Best, Uwe Ligges On 31.01.2016 12:13, Patrick Giraudoux wrote: Le 31/01/2016 11:37, Patrick Giraudoux a écrit : I am trying to check a package using R 3.2.3 on Windows R cmd check --as-cran pgirmess but surprisingly, the

Re: [R-pkg-devel] R CMD check yielding different results for me than CRAN reviewer

2016-01-26 Thread Uwe Ligges
'? The reviewer uses a recent version of R-devel (i.e. a daily built), a recent set of packages (i.e. run update.packages() first) and then R CMD check --as-cran (well, at least similar, but you will get the warnings you talk about if you do that, as I already told you when you asked CRAN). Best, Uwe

Re: [R-pkg-devel] “unable to find an inherited method” error in choroplethr package

2016-03-28 Thread Uwe Ligges
I just tried your code with acs 2.0 and choroplethr 3.5.1 under R-3.3.0 alpha and got a result rather than an error... Are you using a different version of anything? Best, Uwe Ligges On 28.03.2016 22:49, arilamst...@gmail.com wrote: Unfortunately I am still getting the same error

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Best approach to cascading errors

2016-04-06 Thread Uwe Ligges
admins patience? Please only fix the one that needs fixing, all other do not need to be changed then. Best, Uwe Ligges Best regards, Pedro. __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Is it possible to protect a word from the spell checker?

2016-03-02 Thread Uwe Ligges
Indeed, from Writing R Extensions: "double quotes should be used for quotations (including titles of books and articles), and single quotes for non-English usage, including names of other packages and external software." Best, Uwe On 02.03.2016 09:53, Martin Maechler wrote: Hana

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Definition of "reverse imports"

2016-05-03 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 03.05.2016 21:31, ProfJCNash wrote: I noted that my nlmrt package on CRAN has package usl as a "reverse imports". In a modest search I have yet to find a definition of the term. Does anyone have a pointer? That means usl imports from your nlmrt package. Best, Uwe Lig

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Possible R CMD check extensions (Was: Possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION)

2016-05-08 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 08.05.2016 17:44, Hadley Wickham wrote: On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.dun...@gmail.com> wrote: On 08/05/2016 10:47 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: On 8 May 2016 at 16:18, Uwe Ligges wrote: | On 08.05.2016 16:13, carlos cinelli wrote: | > How should

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Possible mis-spelled words ...

2016-07-21 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 22.07.2016 00:48, Rolf Turner wrote: On 22/07/16 10:37, Uwe Ligges wrote: On 22.07.2016 00:34, Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 21/07/2016 5:48 PM, Rolf Turner wrote: I just had a revision of a package built by win-builder, as a way of exposing it to a rigorous check before uploading it to CRAN

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Possible mis-spelled words ...

2016-07-21 Thread Uwe Ligges
that patches are still welcome.... Best, Uwe Ligges Duncan Murdoch I have a very vague recollection of having seen something about this topic on this mailing list, but a search of the archives turned up nothing. Nor could I find anything about "mis-spellings" in "Writing R Extensi

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Handling Not-Always-Needed Dependencies?

2016-08-03 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 03.08.2016 16:14, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: On 3 August 2016 at 16:00, Uwe Ligges wrote: | On 03.08.2016 14:24, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > Then again, users of TravisCI know that just toggling | > | > _R_CHECK_FORCE_SUGGESTS_=FALSE | | I was travelling, hence a delayed response

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Handling Not-Always-Needed Dependencies?

2016-08-03 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 03.08.2016 17:17, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: On 3 August 2016 at 16:21, Uwe Ligges wrote: | | | On 03.08.2016 16:14, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > On 3 August 2016 at 16:00, Uwe Ligges wrote: | > | On 03.08.2016 14:24, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > Then again, users o

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Pkgs with ToS violations

2016-08-04 Thread Uwe Ligges
CRAN will follow up with the package maintainer. Best, Uwe Ligges On 04.08.2016 10:50, peter dalgaard wrote: On 04 Aug 2016, at 05:21 , Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org> wrote: On 3 August 2016 at 22:26, Bob Rudis wrote: | I came across https://cran.rstudio.com/web/packages/box

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Handling Not-Always-Needed Dependencies? - Part 2

2016-08-04 Thread Uwe Ligges
requires it or "Suggests" because no end user ever needs it? If "Depends", then it leads to over-installation of the package by end users who don't care about running tests locally. If "Suggests", then all of the tests would fail (assuming that Dirk's suggesti

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Handling Not-Always-Needed Dependencies?

2016-08-03 Thread Uwe Ligges
a point for the discussion, because there is even a CRAN policy that explain the procedure if there is really need (which should be carefully decided) to break things. Best, Uwe Ligges [1] actually, once we know a pkg is Recommended, the 'if(requireNamespace)' could even be absorbed

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Handling Not-Always-Needed Dependencies?

2016-08-03 Thread Uwe Ligges
it helps for the majority of developers and users. As an example, I nneed to explain myself again and again what "Enhances" means (and perhaps I am still doing it wrong). Best, Uwe Ligges -Thomas [1] https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-devel/R-exts.html#Package-Dependencies Thomas

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Handling Not-Always-Needed Dependencies?

2016-08-03 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 03.08.2016 14:24, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: On 2 August 2016 at 19:45, Duncan Murdoch wrote: | Why not put together code to implement your idea, and see how big the | problem would be to phase it in, by seeing how many packages fail under it? Ahh, the old 'put-up-or-shut-up' gambit, very

Re: [R-pkg-devel] R CMD Check: Tests running infinite

2017-02-01 Thread Uwe Ligges
Check whether the parallel cluster is closed. Can it be that the cluster is still open and the check process waits for them to complete? Best, Uwe Ligges On 31.01.2017 13:45, Patrick Schratz wrote: Hello, when running R CMD check / devtools::check, section "running

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Error in pkg Check Results

2017-02-06 Thread Uwe Ligges
. Best, Uwe Ligges Best Daniel -- _ Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf; Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts; Gerichtsstand: Hamburg | www.uke.de Vorstandsmitglieder: Prof. Dr. Burkhard Göke (Vorsitzender), Prof. Dr. Dr. Uwe

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Process for building vignettes during a CRAN package submission

2017-01-26 Thread Uwe Ligges
s shipped is the one you built locally. CRAN tests if it can be rebuilt. Best, Uwe Ligges [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/list

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Handling Not-Always-Needed Dependencies? - Part 2

2016-08-04 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 04.08.2016 17:46, Paul Gilbert wrote: (One question from the thread Handling Not-Always-Needed Dependencies?) I hope not to start another long tangled thread, but I have a basic confusion which I think has a yes/no answer and I would like to know if there is agreement on this point (or is

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Compiler choice on CRAN (R-windows-oldrel)

2016-08-25 Thread Uwe Ligges
for R < 3.3.0 and to gcc 4.9.3 for R >= 3.3.0. If your package fails for gcc 4.6.3 we can live with it. Same for the other platform CRAN runs checks for, typically there is one compiler (as specified on the CRAN web pages). Best, Uwe Ligges Op do 25 aug. 2016 om 12:17 schreef

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Some windows binaries missing from PACKAGES, 3.3 & 3.4

2016-09-12 Thread Uwe Ligges
I guess they got corrupted during some system problems on winbuilder last night, new (complete) versions are already waiting to be synced by the CRAN master server (without manual interaction). Best, Uwe On 12.09.2016 12:00, Gábor Csárdi wrote: Dear all, I accidentally noticed that some

Re: [R-pkg-devel] .gitkeep file to prevent folder from erasing when empty

2016-10-04 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 04.10.2016 01:58, Luck Buttered wrote: Hello everyone: Inside .Rbuildignore, I put the following line: ^OutputFolder$ Then indicate that you just want to ignore files within OutputFolder. Best, Uwe Ligges However, I notice that the extdata/OutputFolder still disappears

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Note and warning about subdirectory sizes

2016-10-04 Thread Uwe Ligges
vignettes=gs But then when I ran check(), I still noticed the WARNING. You shoudl be able to run R CMD build --compact-vignettes=gs on the package directory and then R CMD check on the tarball. In that case the warning should disappear. Best, Uwe Ligges I also ran: build(compact-vign

Re: [R-pkg-devel] doc url to vignette

2016-09-21 Thread Uwe Ligges
Update: The https://cran.r-project.org/package=NAME/ syntax works now and is accepted. Best, Uwe Ligges On 21.09.2016 14:20, Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 21/09/2016 7:57 AM, S Ellison wrote: > How can I link to a certain page on CRAN without getting flagged for non- > canonical CR

Re: [R-pkg-devel] .gitkeep file to prevent folder from erasing when empty

2016-10-03 Thread Uwe Ligges
). Note that this is a bad idea. Your users may not have write access to that folder, e.g. for network wiede installation as the one at my department. Also, you have to ask users (por let them enter a path or file) before writing somewhere on the filespace if not tempdir(). Best, Uwe Ligges

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Packages extending ggplot2 and ggplot2 2.2.0

2016-11-12 Thread Uwe Ligges
th ggplot2 (< 2.2.0)... They will fit to the ggplot2 version that is available. So, my question is, as maintainer of ggpmisc and ggspectra, should I release new versions that import ggplot2 (>= 2.2.0)? Not needed. Best, Uwe Ligges This would be easy enough, and in the c

Re: [R-pkg-devel] building binary gives error when trying to load

2016-11-01 Thread Uwe Ligges
Use forward slashes in file specification such as c:/Users/rampa/ Best, Uwe Ligges On 01.11.2016 14:49, Rampal Etienne wrote: Dear all, When I try to build a Windows binary in RStudio using R-devel, everything goes well until the packages is tested whether it can be loaded. I then get

Re: [R-pkg-devel] building binary gives error when trying to load

2016-11-01 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 01.11.2016 15:56, Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 01/11/2016 9:49 AM, Rampal Etienne wrote: Dear all, When I try to build a Windows binary in RStudio using R-devel, everything goes well until the packages is tested whether it can be loaded. I then get the error: ** testing if installed package

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Orphaned Package listing trouble?

2016-11-03 Thread Uwe Ligges
not sure if it has been orphaned is that I am having trouble viewing the orphaned package listing. The following page is blank for me (shows no package listings): https://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/Orphaned -jsta Hard to say without knowing which package you are taking about. Best, Uwe Ligges

Re: [R-pkg-devel] maintainer built vignette

2017-04-07 Thread Uwe Ligges
to the auto-rejection message and explain the situation. The CRAN team probably will decide to special case the package then so that the vignettes are not checked. Best, Uwe Ligges On 07.04.2017 06:15, Ian Carroll wrote: With `BuildVignettes: no` in my DESCRIPTION and `^vignettes` in my

Re: [R-pkg-devel] R CMD check not finding my vignettes

2017-04-07 Thread Uwe Ligges
, David David On 7 April 2017 at 07:15, Uwe Ligges <lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de <mailto:lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de>> wrote: I do not know devtools, but the vignette sources should be placed in ./vignettes and then R CMD build will put the files into the rel

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Confirmation page package check version question

2017-04-17 Thread Uwe Ligges
re you had problems in the old version. Only after that confirmation the check service will start to check your ost recent submission. Best, Uwe Ligges Thanks. [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list

Re: [R-pkg-devel] R CMD check not finding my vignettes

2017-04-07 Thread Uwe Ligges
I do not know devtools, but the vignette sources should be placed in ./vignettes and then R CMD build will put the files into the relevant places automatically. Best, Uwe Ligges On 07.04.2017 07:55, David Hugh-Jones wrote: Okay, so this got tumbleweeded... so should I file a bug? D

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Build error: "DLL 'BayesFactor' not found: maybe not installed for this architecture?"

2017-04-19 Thread Uwe Ligges
A race condition on the check system. Best, Uwe Ligges On 18.04.2017 13:22, Nathaniel Phillips wrote: In submitting my package yarrr v0.1.5 to CRAN (https://github.com/ ndphillips/yarrr), I received the following error: * installing *source* package 'yarrr' ... ** R ** data *** moving

Re: [R-pkg-devel] mistake in submission of MODIStsp

2017-08-13 Thread Uwe Ligges
s-ci (also with as--cran option active) didn't catch the problem. Are there different check settings active on the different builds ? Yes, but in this case all shluld have got the same problem unless you are using the function only under non Windows OS? Best, Uwe Ligges Thanks in advance

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN checks errors

2017-08-12 Thread Uwe Ligges
. Best, Uwe Ligges On 12.08.2017 17:04, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: On 12 August 2017 at 15:40, Jernej Jevšenak wrote: | Ok, I see now, that actually everything is OK. | | ERROR on older versions of R is therefore not a problem, right? "Ideally" those would show OK too but it is of lesser

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Loading Libraries Outside of .lib.loc

2017-06-28 Thread Uwe Ligges
Just set .libPaths("/tmp/current") and then library(devtools) shoudl do the trick. Best, Uwe Ligges On 28.06.2017 22:23, Bill Denney wrote: Hi, I'm working on a script to test my library (PKNCA) for what the minimum required version of its dependencies are. Specifically, I'v

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package submission with external library

2017-06-30 Thread Uwe Ligges
of Makevars.win files from other GSL using packages ... Best, Uwe Ligges On 30.06.2017 13:57, Nicolas Hiot wrote: Hello, I'm the developer of a package for R, it's work fine on my computer but when I publish it the installation failed due to the external library. My C code needs GSL (GNU

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Functions erroneously identified as S3 methods

2017-07-04 Thread Uwe Ligges
with versions named with underscores but do not want to remove them until a later release. However I received a `pre-test archived` email from the CRAN team: Resubmit and once you get the auto-rejection reply to the CRAN team explaining it by what you wrote here. Best, Uwe Ligges package

Re: [R-pkg-devel] new package submission: "check log incomplete, web timeout?"

2017-04-24 Thread Uwe Ligges
a random error. How long does processing your vignettes take? Best, Uwe Ligges On 24.04.2017 05:43, Jeremy Volkening wrote: Henrik, A completely different alternative, is to have a way to disable parallel processing in your examples / tests / vignettes, e.g. if (np == 1) registerDoSEQ

Re: [R-pkg-devel] WARNING from R-devel not from 3.4.0 "cannot open file ... the process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process"

2017-04-24 Thread Uwe Ligges
This was a bug in R-devel for few days that has been fixed this morning. Best, Uwe Ligges On 24.04.2017 17:58, Bailey, Paul wrote: I'm trying to submit a package and I get an odd error when I run R CMD check --as-cran on R-devel and I only bring this up because I don't get with 3.4.0

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Question on a NOTE when testing a package

2017-05-10 Thread Uwe Ligges
it in the DESCRIPTION file as Imports: MASS Best, Uwe Ligges Is there any other solutions? - Jang Ik Cho, MS Ph.D. Candidate Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Case Western Reserve University Graduate Research Assistant, SR2C Graduate Research Assistant, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA

Re: [R-pkg-devel] [patch] R CMD check when there are no .Rd examples

2017-05-10 Thread Uwe Ligges
There are packages where examples do not make sense, hence we do not generally reject such packages. But if adding examples are reasonable we ask for them. Best, Uwe Ligges On 10.05.2017 17:28, Neal Richardson wrote: Hi, Last week I submitted a new package to CRAN, and it was rejected

Re: [R-pkg-devel] spell checking of the DESCRIPTION file

2017-05-18 Thread Uwe Ligges
check log and package on some web resources so that poeple are able tpo help? Best, Uwe Ligges On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 1:01 AM, Uwe Ligges <lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de <mailto:lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de>> wrote: On 17.05.2017 16:34, michel.grze...@inrs.fr <mail

Re: [R-pkg-devel] spell checking of the DESCRIPTION file

2017-05-18 Thread Uwe Ligges
Well, not running an examples because of an error is a bad idea, you should fix the issue that caused the error first. And when I meant you should make available package and check log I meant the version where you did not hide the problems. Best, Uwe Ligges On 18.05.2017 10:55, dharmapal

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package submission - Issue with pandoc in R CMD check

2017-06-22 Thread Uwe Ligges
This should be resolved in general now. Best, Uwe Ligges On 03.06.2017 15:51, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: On 3 June 2017 at 08:30, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | On 27 May 2017 at 22:18, Emmanuel Blondel wrote: | | Dear Uwe, i clearly understand the CRAN team needs time on this. I have

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Warning: Installed R

2017-05-20 Thread Uwe Ligges
Ligges! This was checked with a recent submission of package dplyr that was about to be published on CRAN at the same time but was a bit too restrictive about R verisons. Best, Uwe Ligges On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 3:48 PM, DeCicco, Laura <ldeci...@usgs.gov> wrote: I am unable to

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Pretest failed - pandoc could not fetch local file

2017-05-21 Thread Uwe Ligges
Please take the package tarball you submitted to CRAN and unpack it. It does *not* contain the files. Best, Uwe Ligges On 19.05.2017 20:18, Dean Attali wrote: I'm trying to submit an update to a package 'ddpcr' Here are the pretest logs: https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package submission - Issue with pandoc in R CMD check

2017-05-27 Thread Uwe Ligges
For geometa: If you resubmit without the access to "img.shields.io", we can publish now. Otherweise, as we have not yet managed to get a univesally working pandoc on the CRAN master, we cannot publish your package yet. Best, Uwe Ligges On 27.05.2017 16:20, Emmanuel Blondel wro

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package submission - Issue with pandoc in R CMD check

2017-05-27 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 27.05.2017 16:37, Spencer Graves wrote: On 2017-05-27 9:25 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote: For geometa: If you resubmit without the access to "img.shields.io", we can publish now. Otherweise, as we have not yet managed to get a univesally working pandoc on the CRAN master, we cann

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package submission - Issue with pandoc in R CMD check

2017-05-25 Thread Uwe Ligges
This is currently under inspection by the CRAN team. Apparently img.shields.io have changed the cypher settings and pandoc fails with the new settings. We may have to disable *.md processing for some time. Best, Uwe Ligges On 25.05.2017 20:59, Emmanuel Blondel wrote: Dear all, I've just

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Changing a package's name

2017-06-13 Thread Uwe Ligges
for the CRAN namespace and nobody else can submit another package under such a name is an issue to be considered. So for the archives, as Duncan says: You have to have a very good reason to justify publication of an updated package under a new name. Best, Uwe Ligges Duncan Murdoch On 11/06/2017

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Any new developments on "apparent S3 method" issue?

2017-05-04 Thread Uwe Ligges
enough; and what's mysterious is that *coda* passes the CRAN checks without this same NOTE. Yes. coda had the name for a very long time and it was not reasonable to fix this naming in felicity later on, hence there is a check exclusion in R-devel/src/library/tools/R/utils.R for as.mcmc.list in pa

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Any new developments on "apparent S3 method" issue?

2017-05-07 Thread Uwe Ligges
uch a check-exclusion-inheritance provision may not be very straightforward to implement. Ideally, pkg_B avoids the infelicities that had been established with pkg A. Best, Uwe Ligges Russ -----Original Message- From: Uwe Ligges [mailto:lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de] Sent: Thursday, May 4,

Re: [R-pkg-devel] vignette order

2017-05-02 Thread Uwe Ligges
the sources. Best, Uwe Ligges Best, Paul __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch

Re: [R-pkg-devel] vignette order

2017-05-02 Thread Uwe Ligges
Alphabetical by filename. Best, Uwe Ligges Best, Paul __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package building - compiling multiple dll files from within src directory

2017-05-05 Thread Uwe Ligges
hould have files src/Makefile and src/Makefile.win (unless intended for only Unix-alikes or only Windows)." Best, Uwe Ligges On 04.05.2017 17:09, Mark wrote: Hi, I am creating an R package with multiple c files within src directory. If possible, I would like to create separate dll files

Re: [R-pkg-devel] R package test breakage catch 22

2017-05-02 Thread Uwe Ligges
Submit B first and write in the submission comments that A will fail but a version of A is ready to be submitted once B is accepted. Best, Uwe Ligges On 02.05.2017 06:13, Johannes Ranke wrote: how does one solve this catch-22? I see these possibilities a) reduce the precision

Re: [R-pkg-devel] compact PDF - vignettes

2017-05-24 Thread Uwe Ligges
ave to add or change in order to improve the gs quality to ebook? Not sure about RStudio, but in R I'd use R CMD build --compact-vignettes="both" ... but note you need to have both gs and qpdf installed and on the PATH. Best, Uwe Ligges Thank you, Fernanda [[al

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Dropping empty section problems

2017-10-15 Thread Uwe Ligges
when the database is built. Hence either fill these with content or delete them entirely. Best, Uwe Ligges R CMD check results 0 errors | 0 warnings | 1 note checking Rd files ... NOTE prepare_Rd: QCAT.Rd:38-40: Dropping empty section \details prepare_Rd: QCAT.Rd:56-58: Dropping empty section

Re: [R-pkg-devel] In Description file, how far removed should the depends go?

2017-08-29 Thread Uwe Ligges
just list rerddap in the depends, or should I also list all the packages rerddap depends on - which can go many layers deep. What is best practice for this? Only rerddap, and ideally in Imports rather than Depends. Best, Uwe Ligges Thanks, -Roy ** "The contents

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN submission never published

2017-09-11 Thread Uwe Ligges
Same from here, we have not had such a problem before, please resubmit the package (we do not have it any more) and send us additionally a separate mail to CRAN@... at the same time citing this communication. Best, Uwe Ligges On 11.09.2017 05:28, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: Looks like a hiccup

Re: [R-pkg-devel] README.Rmd and associated figure files

2017-09-11 Thread Uwe Ligges
Hi, If the images are also used for vignettes or Rd files, you can put them in the 'vignettes' or 'man/figures' directories. Otherwise, please put them in the top-level 'tools' directory, or a subdirectory of it. Best, Uwe Ligges On 10.09.2017 00:15, Baptiste Auguie wrote: Hi, I'm not sure

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN Submission Question (FSA)

2017-09-07 Thread Uwe Ligges
Looks like a race condition on the incominf check system. Please simply resubmit. If this happens again, please respond omn the auto generated message and we will take a look manually. Best, Uwe Ligges On 07.09.2017 18:00, Derek Ogle wrote: I recently updated my FSA package and submitted

[R-pkg-devel] CRAN incoming checks / winbuilder on demand results for R-devel

2017-09-13 Thread Uwe Ligges
Dear package developers, given some very recent changes in R-devel, many packages under R-devel have to be reinstalled. Due to maintainance work on CRAN we probably won't process submissions today. R-devel results from winbuilder will be flaky at least during the next 10 hours. Best, Uwe

Re: [R-pkg-devel] R Package Submission Problem

2017-09-27 Thread Uwe Ligges
More important: Checking should be performed on sources prepared by 'R CMD build'. So at first prepare the sources via R CMD build and then check yourself prior to submission following the CRAN policies. And *really* read that. Best, Uwe Ligges On 27.09.2017 21:02, MTurgeon wrote: Hi

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Confusion over CRAN build error for package Brundle

2017-10-02 Thread Uwe Ligges
which is in development and will be released before R-devel, hence we check against it, but it is rather instable and sometimes we cannot intsall the BioC packagess yet. Best, Uwe Ligges __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Saving provenance data to the file system

2017-08-28 Thread Uwe Ligges
Can't you do it as, e.g. write.table() writes files: Simply require a filename from the user, then you are on the save side. And in your examples / tests, write to some tempfile(). Best, Uwe Ligges On 25.08.2017 21:11, Jenny Bryan wrote: I can't comment on the specific intersection of your

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Rcpp.package.skeleton -- Rcmd check --as-cran Windows

2017-08-28 Thread Uwe Ligges
ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel Apologies Dirk, I should have emphasized that this is on Windows 7. I tried it on a Linux box later with no problem. I sent it to this list because I thought it might be a general problem for package development in Windows. Could it be your Win

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Trying to remove dot file

2017-10-24 Thread Uwe Ligges
the files. I tried using "dot_clean -m --keep=mostrecent /PlotMDS/man" and that didn't seem to remove the file. I am not able to view the file (tried using sudo ls). ls -a Best, Uwe Ligges Does anyone have any suggestions to help me? Any suggestions would be most welcome and a

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Can't reproduce re-building vignettes error in CRAN R CMD check

2017-11-27 Thread Uwe Ligges
This is probbaly a race condition, please resubmit. Best, Uwe Ligges On 22.11.2017 16:49, Devin Incerti wrote: Hi, I have successfully run R CMD check for my package hesim (source <https://github.com/InnovationValueInitiative/hesim>) on OSX sierra, CentOS, Ubuntu 14.04 (on travis-ci), a

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Errors in the pre-test after submitting the R package

2017-11-30 Thread Uwe Ligges
efined reference to `_imp__fftw_plan_dft_c2r_1d' | fftw_wrappers.o:fftw_wrappers.cc:(.text+0x33f): undefined reference to `_imp__fftw_destroy_plan' | fftw_wrappers.o:fftw_wrappers.cc:(.text+0x3bb): undefined reference to `_imp__fftw_execute' | collect2.exe: error: ld returned 1 exit stat

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Errors in the pre-test after submitting the R package

2017-11-30 Thread Uwe Ligges
outdated. I see what I can do to update it during the next days. Best, Uwe Ligges Thank you very much. Best regards, Senren *From:* Uwe Ligges <lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de> *Sent:* 01 December 2017 05

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Problem enhancing a package with a predict method not declared to be an S3 method

2017-12-18 Thread Uwe Ligges
And of course, you can even tell the Rd file that it documents an internal function. Best, Uwe Ligges On 18.12.2017 09:01, Uwe Ligges wrote: On 18.12.2017 05:00, Dario Strbenac wrote: Good day, It seems that they are not internal functions if they are have user documentation written

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Problem enhancing a package with a predict method not declared to be an S3 method

2017-12-18 Thread Uwe Ligges
they are internal or not is given in the NAMESPACE file. Best, Uwe Ligges -- Dario Strbenac University of Sydney Camperdown NSW 2050 Australia __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Rcpp Copyright Query

2017-12-13 Thread Uwe Ligges
This confusion was caused by the CRAN team, who wrote you (Meabh McCurdy) a message about adding missing copyright holders that should have gone to the maintainer of anotehr submission. Our apologies. Best, Uwe Ligges On 12.12.2017 16:06, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: On 12 December 2017

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN check FAIL due to pragmas in headers and code

2017-12-14 Thread Uwe Ligges
uch attention, but today I received a couple of emails warning about my package failing on r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian (gcc and clang) with the following message: Check: pragmas in C/C++ headers and code Result: FAIL A temporary glitch in R-devel that has been fixed yesterday already. Best, Uwe

Re: [R-pkg-devel] [Rd] package check fail on Windows-release only?

2017-11-21 Thread Uwe Ligges
ly happened exactly at a moment where the new Matrix package was already there, but not quite seems quite improbable, but then your problem seems "rare".. Perfect analysis: Race condition. Happens from time to time. Can you simply resubmit it, please. Best, Uw

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Macros in Rd files.

2017-11-09 Thread Uwe Ligges
Note the % may be a comment? Uwe On 09.11.2017 06:05, Rolf Turner wrote: I tried to define a macro to produce today's date (like unto the "\today" command in LaTeX): \newcommand{\today}{format(Sys.date(),"%d/%m/%Y")} I put this into my *.Rd file just before invoking it.  (Something like

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Outdated Winbuilder package "INLA"

2017-11-08 Thread Uwe Ligges
m? Tell the CRAN team. For winbuilder: Tell me. ;-) I will update shortly. Best, Uwe Ligges Kind regards, Fabian Bachl [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/l

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Outdated Winbuilder package "INLA"

2017-11-08 Thread Uwe Ligges
Now insalled, please resub,it the package now. Best, Uwe Ligges On 08.11.2017 17:21, Uwe Ligges wrote: On 08.11.2017 14:25, Fabian Bachl wrote: Hi everyone, I am trying to submit a package to CRAN that depends on INLA, which itself is not on CRAN. However, INLA is installed

Re: [R-pkg-devel] issues with SOfun - package upload

2017-11-08 Thread Uwe Ligges
And even this cannot work for strong dependencies, as sztrong deendencies must be available from mainstream repositoreis. Best, Uwe Ligges On 08.11.2017 17:59, Brian G. Peterson wrote: I think you should be using: Additional_repositories: https://github.com/mrdwab/SOfun since

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Error in globalVariables(".") : could not find function "globalVariables"

2017-11-06 Thread Uwe Ligges
d function "globalVariables" Can you grep for globalVariables in your code? THis is from package utils and hence you may have to declare it. Best, Uwe Ligges ... * checking PDF version of manual ... OK * DONE Status: 1 NOTE See https://win-builder.r-project.

Re: [R-pkg-devel] How to include examples that run > 5 secs and contain personal info

2017-11-06 Thread Uwe Ligges
Then simply explain this situation to the CRAN team and "they" will probably let the package pass. Best, Uwe Ligges On 06.11.2017 14:25, Jorge Cimentada wrote: Hi, I'm in the process of submitting a package to CRAN and I've run into an issue with the examples of some functions. T

Re: [R-pkg-devel] (no subject)

2017-12-05 Thread Uwe Ligges
nsider simplifying your examples a little bit to get shorter run times. Also you may use \dontrun{} to avoid running a specially heavy example. Ideally use toy examples so that they can be executed quickly. not only preferabble for CRAN but also for your users to be able to quickly s

  1   2   3   4   >