Re: [R-pkg-devel] packaging biosig for R

2020-03-16 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 16.03.2020 10:58, Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 16/03/2020 3:00 a.m., Alois Schlögl wrote: Thanks for your response. For *nix (Linux, MacOSX), this can be achieved. For windows, currently the only way to compile libbiosig is through mingw-cross-compiler environment (MXE) [1]  or in cygwin.

Re: [R-pkg-devel] packaging biosig for R

2020-03-16 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 16/03/2020 3:00 a.m., Alois Schlögl wrote: Thanks for your response. For *nix (Linux, MacOSX), this can be achieved. For windows, currently the only way to compile libbiosig is through mingw-cross-compiler environment (MXE) [1]  or in cygwin. Currently, libbiosig does not compile with with

Re: [R-pkg-devel] packaging biosig for R

2020-03-16 Thread Alois Schlögl
Thanks for your response. For *nix (Linux, MacOSX), this can be achieved. For windows, currently the only way to compile libbiosig is through mingw-cross-compiler environment (MXE) [1]  or in cygwin. Currently, libbiosig does not compile with with VC++for various reasons, and libbiosig has some

Re: [R-pkg-devel] packaging biosig for R

2020-03-15 Thread Duncan Murdoch
I suspect the question in this case depends on the availability of libbiosig. If CRAN test machines don't have that and its source isn't included in the R package, then it will fail on initial install. CRAN doesn't have a lot of resources to install difficult libraries; I have no idea if

Re: [R-pkg-devel] packaging biosig for R

2020-03-15 Thread Jeff Newmiller
I am just a lurker (not representing CRAN) but I am having a hard time understanding your question. Binary packages are a convenience for users, not a method for submitting packages. When you have an R package accepted it is accepted in source format. If it doesn't exclude support for Windows