Hi all
I am working in some variation partiting analysis using two different
sets of predictive matrices but with the same set of explanatory
variables. As expected I end up getting the results for % variation
explained by [E], [S], [E+S] and unexplained variation.
The results I get for both
Hello
I am a new user of R and try to use Simplex to solve the linear programming
problem.
My problem has 47 variable.
enj is the vector of object function which is 1*47 dimension
M1 and M2 are 2 1000*48 dimension matrixes. The first column in M1 indicated
b1 and 2-48 for the A1 as following
Hi all
I am working in some variation partiting analysis using two different
sets of predictive matrices but with the same set of explanatory
variables. As expected I end up getting the results for % variation
explained by [E], [S], [E+S] and unexplained variation.
The results I get for both
Dear Manuel,
You can use the Wilson method (with Yates'
continuity correction) to calculate CIs for
proportion data. It's formally described and
advocated in the following articles:
Newcombe R.G. (1998) Two-Sided Confidence
Intervals for the Single Proportion: Comparison
of Seven Methods.
Dear list members,
If I have 3 frequencies (3 mutually exclusive groups):
white: 19
black: 43
red: 24
How can I obtain confidence intervals for the proportions, instead of a
P value from a chisquare test in R?
Or better, how can I assess "effect size" instead of finishing the
analysis on a P
Bessie,
Another, non-trellis/lattice way to do this is simply with boxplot().
boxplot(response~factor) will plot a boxplot for each of your factor
levels.
For greater control (i.e. removing whiskers, etc.) of boxplot see the
help on boxplot(), bxp(), and boxplot.stats().
Hope this is along the