[R-sig-eco] adehabitat and Lat Long data

2012-08-27 Thread Mike
Hi

I have ARGOS satellite tag data from some some very long distance traveling
sharks.  These
critters cover large chunks of the Atlantic; coordinates are in
decimal degrees.

It would love to apply the residenceTime function in the adehabitat package
to try and segment the paths into broad homogeneous bouts of movement (i.e.
migration, seasonal residence/feeding areas etc).  But as far as I can tell
from the documentation and the examples it seems that the data must be in
some sort of Cartesian coordinate system.  Conversion to UTM's wouldn't be
practical in
this case because the movement tracks encompass many UTM zones.  Is there
a way to do the residence time analysis in adehabitat using data in decimal
degrees that perhaps I am just missing?  

If not, does anybody have any code or recommendations for another way to go
about this?  Any insight appreciated!

Thanks 
-Mike 




--
View this message in context: 
http://r-sig-ecology.471788.n2.nabble.com/adehabitat-and-Lat-Long-data-tp7577571.html
Sent from the r-sig-ecology mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
R-sig-ecology mailing list
R-sig-ecology@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-ecology


Re: [R-sig-eco] adehabitat and Lat Long data

2012-08-27 Thread Jeff Holland
Hello Mike,
   One approach may be to convert your coordinates to a custom continuous
equidistant conic projection with a central meridian near the center of your
coordinates.  This should help minimize errors in distances calculated
across a large area.  Hope that is useful.
   Cheers,
   Jeff



--
View this message in context: 
http://r-sig-ecology.471788.n2.nabble.com/adehabitat-and-Lat-Long-data-tp7577571p7577573.html
Sent from the r-sig-ecology mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
R-sig-ecology mailing list
R-sig-ecology@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-ecology


[R-sig-eco] Multivariate ANOVA based on dissimilarities

2012-08-27 Thread Maurício Moraes Zenker
Dear all,


I’m using the function “adonis” (multivariate ANOVA based on
dissimilarities) to study beta diversity of moths between altitudinal
levels and seasons. My analysis is based on the example included in the
vegan tutorial “Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Communities in R: vegan
tutorial”, written by Jari Oksanen. As in the example, the analysis of my
data indicated that there are significant differences. However, the Tukey’s
test indicated that there are no differences between groups? Why does it
happen? Shouldn’t the Tukey’s test show that one group is different from
another?

The script is almost the same of the tutorial but with more permutations.



Thank you.



Mauricio



Permanova-read.table(Permanova.txt,header=T)

PermanovaII-read.table(PermanovaII.txt,header=T)

betad - betadiver(Permanova, z)

adonis(formula = betad ~ Altitude*Season,data = PermanovaII,

permutations = 1000)

hov - with(PermanovaII, betadisper(betad, Altitude))

TukeyHSD(hov)

hovII - with(PermanovaII, betadisper(betad, Season))

TukeyHSD(hovII)

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

___
R-sig-ecology mailing list
R-sig-ecology@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-ecology


Re: [R-sig-eco] Multivariate ANOVA based on dissimilarities

2012-08-27 Thread Jari Oksanen
Mauricio,

Nothing reproducible here (we don't have your data sets), not even the output.

In your email you only write about adonis() and the p-values you got from 
adonis. On the other hand, your TukeyHSD() is based on betadisper(), and you 
never seem to check the betadisper() p-values. These two methods are radically 
different: adonis() is about differences between groups, and betadisper() is 
about dispersions within groups. We expect some kind of consistency between 
betadisper() p-values and TukeyHSD() of betadisper, but adonis() is quite a 
different beast which has little to do with betadisper().

If you take an analogy to standard statistics: adonis() is like (M)ANOVA, 
betadisper() is like Levene's test of homogeneity (what ever that means) of 
variances, and TukeyHSD() is its sequel about detecting cases with different 
variances.

I suggest you rather use 999 permutations than 1000: you can get nicer round 
figures. Once we were more patronizing and dropped one permutation if the user 
asked for even hundred or thousand, but then we thought that this is up to user 
to decide and none of our business.

Cheers, Jari Oksanen

On 27/08/2012, at 23:23 PM, Maurício Moraes Zenker wrote:

 Dear all,
 
 
 I‚m using the function „adonis‰ (multivariate ANOVA based on
 dissimilarities) to study beta diversity of moths between altitudinal
 levels and seasons. My analysis is based on the example included in the
 vegan tutorial „Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Communities in R: vegan
 tutorial‰, written by Jari Oksanen. As in the example, the analysis of my
 data indicated that there are significant differences. However, the Tukey‚s
 test indicated that there are no differences between groups? Why does it
 happen? Shouldn‚t the Tukey‚s test show that one group is different from
 another?
 
 The script is almost the same of the tutorial but with more permutations.
 
 
 
 Thank you.
 
 
 
 Mauricio
 
 
 
 Permanova-read.table(Permanova.txt,header=T)
 
 PermanovaII-read.table(PermanovaII.txt,header=T)
 
 betad - betadiver(Permanova, z)
 
 adonis(formula = betad ~ Altitude*Season,data = PermanovaII,
 
 permutations = 1000)
 
 hov - with(PermanovaII, betadisper(betad, Altitude))
 
 TukeyHSD(hov)
 
 hovII - with(PermanovaII, betadisper(betad, Season))
 
 TukeyHSD(hovII)
 
   [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
 
 ___
 R-sig-ecology mailing list
 R-sig-ecology@r-project.org
 https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-ecology

-- 
Jari Oksanen, Dept Biology, Univ Oulu, 90014 Finland
jari.oksa...@oulu.fi, Ph. +358 400 408593, http://cc.oulu.fi/~jarioksa

___
R-sig-ecology mailing list
R-sig-ecology@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-ecology