Hey
http://d2vadds.com/father.php?born=3zcmkn5madsq1fudm2
Angie Larsen
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
___
R-sig-ecology mailing list
R-sig-ecology@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-ecology
Hi Andrew,
On 24 October 2014 01:41, Andrew Halford wrote:
> Dear Gavin,
>
> Firstly let me say that I take offence at your "bogus" comment. Just
> because I, like many others who interact on this list, often struggle
> conceptually with the overwhelming analysis choices that are required in
> o
Andrew,
Your problems arise from two issues:
1) The overall test of equal P[prefer] in each age and the tests of equal
P[prefer] in a specific pair of ages are based on different testing
philosophies (Score or LR test for the overall test and Wald test for the
pairwise comparisons).
2) The be
Andrew,
If the 24 rows are the data you are analysing, I cannot replicate any of your
significant results within that glm framework *if* I take into account the
overdispersion. The full model with age*test interaction is saturated and
cannot be analysed at all, but the main effects model age+te
Dear Gavin,
Firstly let me say that I take offence at your "bogus" comment. Just
because I, like many others who interact on this list, often struggle
conceptually with the overwhelming analysis choices that are required in
our line of work doesn't give you the right to drop snide remarks as you
s
On 24/10/2014, at 09:03 AM, V. Coudrain wrote:
> Thank you all for the good discussion. To recenter the debate if you are
> interested in, my data are actually: 20 sample locations distributed across 5
> treatments (4 locations / treatment). Each sample location has been surveyed
> for 4 years
