Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Problem with the update to R 4.0.2 in the Fedora users' list

2020-07-23 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Tuesday, 21 July 2020 16.43.31 WEST Tom Callaway wrote: > I'm inclined to agree. Users are expecting that things they install > manually will override the system default (if any). > > Tom FWIW I agree with both of you. OTOH someone who never did that kind of error please raise your hand. :-)

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Problem with the update to R 4.0.2 in the Fedora users' list

2020-07-21 Thread Tom Callaway
I'm inclined to agree. Users are expecting that things they install manually will override the system default (if any). Tom On Tue, Jul 21, 2020, 11:39 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 at 17:17, José Abílio Matos wrote: > > > > There was a thread this weekend in the fedora users'

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Problem with the update to R 4.0.2 in the Fedora users' list

2020-07-21 Thread Iñaki Ucar
On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 at 17:17, José Abílio Matos wrote: > > There was a thread this weekend in the fedora users' mailing list where a user > had problems updating R 4.0.2: > > "non-rpm R libraries not accessible now w R v 4.0.x" >

[R-sig-Fedora] Problem with the update to R 4.0.2 in the Fedora users' list

2020-07-21 Thread José Abílio Matos
There was a thread this weekend in the fedora users' mailing list where a user had problems updating R 4.0.2: "non-rpm R libraries not accessible now w R v 4.0.x" https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/us...@lists.fedoraproject.org/ thread/2FFST3GWZCNM45SX53VKB255TO4LOV4C/ TLDR; as far