Hi all,
There is a short explanation of the law suite on the wikipedia page (History-);
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tz_database
Rgds,
Matti Zemack, Stockholm, Sweden
On 7 okt 2011, at 12.00, r-sig-finance-requ...@r-project.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Jeffrey Ryan
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/10/07/unix_time_zone_database_destroyed/
___
R-SIG-Finance@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-finance
-- Subscriber-posting only. If you want to post, subscribe first.
-- Also note
Dear John,
yes it does seem to be a problem with my network connection. Thanks
for your help, and for the great package!
Aidan
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 6:42 PM, John Laing john.la...@gmail.com wrote:
Aidan,
Sorry for the delayed response.
Your code runs pretty quickly for me:
Hello Everybody,
In relation to this subject, does anybody know the protection status on
historical financial quote data (stocks, futures) and/or the dissemination
of graphs/analyses based off such data?
I thought it would fall in the public domain as the TZ data does, but it
seems that I am
On 7 October 2011 at 10:41, Brian G. Peterson wrote:
| On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 09:48 -0500, Andrew Miller wrote:
| In relation to this subject, does anybody know the protection status on
| historical financial quote data (stocks, futures) and/or the dissemination
| of graphs/analyses based off
On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 11:12 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
Google/Yahoo actually pay the exchanges. That came up when Google
started to show real-time data in an Ajax-y form (that you can easily
program against) and some news stories at the time reported what deal
Google had struck with the
On 7 October 2011 at 12:05, Brian G. Peterson wrote:
| On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 11:12 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| Google/Yahoo actually pay the exchanges. That came up when Google
| started to show real-time data in an Ajax-y form (that you can easily
| program against) and some news
Am 07.10.2011 19:44, schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel:
Andrew also asked about the dissemination of derived analysis (graphs etc).
which I think that is fine because that is your work rather that their raw
data. IANAL.
Actually that's not entirely the best answer as this again depends on
the data
Thank you for all of your responses, they have helped a lot.
One thing that interests me is how much analysis would have to be done to
distribute the graphs? For example, would posting a simple graph of the
price history, or the spread between two futures be acceptable without
license? Or would
interesting studies:
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111006/11532316235/astrolabe-claims-it-holds-copyright-timezone-data-sues-maintainers-public-timezone-database.shtml
http://www.thedailyparker.com/PermaLink,guid,c5f28bae-4b9c-41ea-b7b7-8891ad63c938.aspx
best,
daniel
2011/10/7 Andrew
Posting simple graphs, even raw data is *likely* to be okay for three reasons:
1) No one will care. Yahoo, CME, etc would gain little in preventing
this or tracking it.
2) No one could tell were your data comes from anyway - especially if
it is graph.
3) Fair Use
of course, I am not a lawyer...
11 matches
Mail list logo
