On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Federico Calboli
wrote:
[...]
> I do that *with the current release of R* and I never had an issue
> whatsoever. Incidentally the words 'This should be done with the current
> version of R-devel (or if that is not possible, current R-patched or the
> current relea
On 20 Jan 2014, at 09:31, Federico Calboli wrote:
> On 18 Jan 2014, at 14:31, Axel Urbiz wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>> I'm planning to submit my first package to R, and although I read all the
>> documentation, I'm not very clear on the following 2 items, from which I'd
>> appreciate your guid
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Federico Calboli wrote:
[...]
>
> That's as interesting as the English language makes it -- please note of
> the expression 'should' as opposed to 'must', and the list of three options
> of R versions.
>
Well, my interpretation is that package maintainers are ex
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 4:31 AM, Federico Calboli
wrote:
[...]
> Is it? this is news to me. I have a grand total of 2 packages up and I
> never ever used R-devel, and never ever had a problem, had a report of a
> problem or had a note from CRAn about my packages not being ok because I
> built th
On Jan 20, 2014, at 10:34 AM, Federico Calboli wrote:
>
> On 20 Jan 2014, at 15:15, Gábor Csárdi wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Federico Calboli
>> wrote:
>> [...]
>> I do that *with the current release of R* and I never had an issue
>> whatsoever. Incidentally the words 'Th
On Jan 20, 2014, at 4:31 AM, Federico Calboli wrote:
> On 18 Jan 2014, at 14:31, Axel Urbiz wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>> I'm planning to submit my first package to R, and although I read all the
>> documentation, I'm not very clear on the following 2 items, from which I'd
>> appreciate your
On 20 Jan 2014, at 15:15, Gábor Csárdi wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Federico Calboli
> wrote:
> [...]
> I do that *with the current release of R* and I never had an issue
> whatsoever. Incidentally the words 'This should be done with the current
> version of R-devel (or if that
On 20 Jan 2014, at 14:51, Gábor Csárdi wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 4:31 AM, Federico Calboli
> wrote:
> [...]
> Is it? this is news to me. I have a grand total of 2 packages up and I
> never ever used R-devel, and never ever had a problem, had a report of a
> problem or had a note fro
On 20 Jan 2014, at 09:31, Federico Calboli wrote:
> On 18 Jan 2014, at 14:31, Axel Urbiz wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>> I'm planning to submit my first package to R, and although I read all the
>> documentation, I'm not very clear on the following 2 items, from which I'd
>> appreciate your guid
On 18 Jan 2014, at 14:31, Axel Urbiz wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
> I'm planning to submit my first package to R, and although I read all the
> documentation, I'm not very clear on the following 2 items, from which I'd
> appreciate your guidance:
>
>
> 1)I understand it is suggested to use the R dev
Hi All,
I'm planning to submit my first package to R, and although I read all the
documentation, I'm not very clear on the following 2 items, from which I'd
appreciate your guidance:
1)I understand it is suggested to use the R dev version to build the
package. Which one specifically should I us
11 matches
Mail list logo