Re: [R-SIG-Mac] rgdal on mac os 10.9

2014-04-30 Thread Manuel Spínola
Hi Ian, I installed from here: http://cran.r-project.org/bin/macosx/contrib/3.1/ Manuel 2014-04-29 15:08 GMT-06:00 Ian Fellows ian.fell...@stat.ucla.edu: Hi All, Does anyone know if there are plans to have rgdal compile correctly on the CRAN Mavericks machine? I’ve really been enjoying

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] rgdal on mac os 10.9

2014-04-30 Thread Rainer M Krug
If I remember correctly, the installation from source was quite easy: apart from the usual compilers, you need gdal installed, which installs easily via homebrew [1]. After this, installation of rgdal from source worked without any additional configurations? Rainer Ian Fellows

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] rgdal on mac os 10.9

2014-04-30 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On 30/04/2014 13:56, Rainer M Krug wrote: If I remember correctly, the installation from source was quite easy: apart from the usual compilers, you need gdal installed, which installs easily via homebrew [1]. After this, installation of rgdal from source worked without any additional

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] rgdal on mac os 10.9

2014-04-30 Thread Rainer M Krug
Prof Brian Ripley rip...@stats.ox.ac.uk writes: On 30/04/2014 13:56, Rainer M Krug wrote: If I remember correctly, the installation from source was quite easy: apart from the usual compilers, you need gdal installed, which installs easily via homebrew [1]. After this, installation of rgdal

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] rgdal on mac os 10.9

2014-04-30 Thread Ian Fellows
Thanks for the replies everyone, @Simon: Thank you. That will be most useful, especially for those of us with dependent packages and (shall we say) a less sophisticated user base. @Brian: Thank you for pointing that out, though I think “ignored is a inappropriate word. My main concern is not

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] rgdal on mac os 10.9

2014-04-30 Thread Simon Urbanek
On Apr 30, 2014, at 12:42 PM, Ian Fellows ian.fell...@stat.ucla.edu wrote: Thanks for the replies everyone, @Simon: Thank you. That will be most useful, especially for those of us with dependent packages and (shall we say) a less sophisticated user base. @Brian: Thank you for pointing