Re: [R-SIG-Mac] Compiling against the Accelerate framework on OS X 10.9

2013-10-28 Thread peter dalgaard
On Oct 27, 2013, at 22:33 , Simon Zehnder wrote: P.S.: I would consider the gcc4.8.2 binary from http://hpc.sourceforge.net for Mavericks and ML; I worked before with the macports alternative and found it easier to use these binaries. They are always up to date… --- except that MacPorts

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] Compiling against the Accelerate framework on OS X 10.9

2013-10-28 Thread Simon Zehnder
Just for the record, I install the gcc binaries from http://hpc.sourceforge.net (no MacPorts anymore) and with these I compile R from sources. Before I used the gcc4.8 from Macports - but never used R from MacPorts. And yes, with Apple installation of any open-source software including a

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] Compiling against the Accelerate framework on OS X 10.9

2013-10-28 Thread Federico Calboli
On 27 Oct 2013, at 21:33, Simon Zehnder szehn...@uni-bonn.de wrote: P.S.: I would consider the gcc4.8.2 binary from http://hpc.sourceforge.net for Mavericks and ML; I worked before with the macports alternative and found it easier to use these binaries. They are always up to date… Please

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] Compiling against the Accelerate framework on OS X 10.9

2013-10-28 Thread Simon Zehnder
Thanks for the link! Something new for me. On 28 Oct 2013, at 12:11, Federico Calboli f.calb...@imperial.ac.uk wrote: On 27 Oct 2013, at 21:33, Simon Zehnder szehn...@uni-bonn.de wrote: P.S.: I would consider the gcc4.8.2 binary from http://hpc.sourceforge.net for Mavericks and ML; I

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] Compiling against the Accelerate framework on OS X 10.9

2013-10-28 Thread Jon Clayden
Thanks for the replies. Adding -D__ACCELERATE__ to CPPFLAGS does seem to work. I did see that thread before, but I was under the impression that it was an issue with configuring against the vecLib framework rather than Accelerate. It seems pretty surprising to me that not defining this