Re: [R-SIG-Mac] rgl_0.92.879 package broke with R 2.15

2012-04-13 Thread Grimes Mark
Duncan Brilliant. This solved the problem. Library (rgl) is now accessiible, and the plot3d function works fine in X11 (which I think is how it worked before anyway). Whatever I may be missing, I don't think I'll notice. Best, Mark On Apr 13, 2012, at 11:08 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] Building binary packages for distribution

2012-04-13 Thread Marc Schwartz
On Apr 13, 2012, at 12:48 PM, Marc Schwartz wrote: > Hi, > > I will readily admit that I am naive in terms of some of the subtleties, but > would running Leopard under Lion in a VM be a suitable possibility? > > It would seem that with Lion, some of the licensing issues relative to > running

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] Building binary packages for distribution

2012-04-13 Thread Marc Schwartz
Hi, I will readily admit that I am naive in terms of some of the subtleties, but would running Leopard under Lion in a VM be a suitable possibility? It would seem that with Lion, some of the licensing issues relative to running non-server versions of the older OSX distributions under a VM have

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] Building binary packages for distribution

2012-04-13 Thread Simon Urbanek
On Apr 13, 2012, at 1:34 PM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > Thanks, that is bad news. > There is a lot of bad new from Apple recently ;) > I really don't want to ask our sysadmins to maintain a Leopard system for the > very limited amount of package building we do, so we'll have to hope this >

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] Building binary packages for distribution

2012-04-13 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
Thanks, that is bad news. I really don't want to ask our sysadmins to maintain a Leopard system for the very limited amount of package building we do, so we'll have to hope this suffices. On 13/04/2012 18:05, Simon Urbanek wrote: On Apr 13, 2012, at 11:36 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: I ha

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] Building binary packages for distribution

2012-04-13 Thread Simon Urbanek
On Apr 13, 2012, at 11:36 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > I have hitherto used a Leopard system to build Mac binary packages for > distribution, but that system has died and we only have Lion systems left > (and the replacement hardware only runs Lion). I'm only concerned with > building i386/

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] Building binary packages for distribution

2012-04-13 Thread Roy Mendelssohn
On Apr 13, 2012, at 8:36 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > I have hitherto used a Leopard system to build Mac binary packages for > distribution, but that system has died and we only have Lion systems left > (and the replacement hardware only runs Lion). I'm only concerned with > building i386/x

[R-SIG-Mac] Building binary packages for distribution

2012-04-13 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
I have hitherto used a Leopard system to build Mac binary packages for distribution, but that system has died and we only have Lion systems left (and the replacement hardware only runs Lion). I'm only concerned with building i386/x86_64 packages. We saw problems with packages built on Snow Le