Re: [R-SIG-Mac] [Rd] My first package

2014-01-20 Thread Gábor Csárdi
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Federico Calboli wrote: [...] > I do that *with the current release of R* and I never had an issue > whatsoever. Incidentally the words 'This should be done with the current > version of R-devel (or if that is not possible, current R-patched or the > current relea

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] My first package

2014-01-20 Thread Matthew Denwood
On 20 Jan 2014, at 09:31, Federico Calboli wrote: > On 18 Jan 2014, at 14:31, Axel Urbiz wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> >> I'm planning to submit my first package to R, and although I read all the >> documentation, I'm not very clear on the following 2 items, from which I'd >> appreciate your guid

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] [Rd] My first package

2014-01-20 Thread Gábor Csárdi
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Federico Calboli wrote: [...] > > That's as interesting as the English language makes it -- please note of > the expression 'should' as opposed to 'must', and the list of three options > of R versions. > Well, my interpretation is that package maintainers are ex

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] [Rd] My first package

2014-01-20 Thread Gábor Csárdi
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 4:31 AM, Federico Calboli wrote: [...] > Is it? this is news to me. I have a grand total of 2 packages up and I > never ever used R-devel, and never ever had a problem, had a report of a > problem or had a note from CRAn about my packages not being ok because I > built th

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] [Rd] My first package

2014-01-20 Thread Simon Urbanek
On Jan 20, 2014, at 10:34 AM, Federico Calboli wrote: > > On 20 Jan 2014, at 15:15, Gábor Csárdi wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Federico Calboli >> wrote: >> [...] >> I do that *with the current release of R* and I never had an issue >> whatsoever. Incidentally the words 'Th

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] My first package

2014-01-20 Thread Simon Urbanek
On Jan 20, 2014, at 4:31 AM, Federico Calboli wrote: > On 18 Jan 2014, at 14:31, Axel Urbiz wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> >> I'm planning to submit my first package to R, and although I read all the >> documentation, I'm not very clear on the following 2 items, from which I'd >> appreciate your

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] [Rd] My first package

2014-01-20 Thread Federico Calboli
On 20 Jan 2014, at 15:15, Gábor Csárdi wrote: > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Federico Calboli > wrote: > [...] > I do that *with the current release of R* and I never had an issue > whatsoever. Incidentally the words 'This should be done with the current > version of R-devel (or if that

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] [Rd] My first package

2014-01-20 Thread Federico Calboli
On 20 Jan 2014, at 14:51, Gábor Csárdi wrote: > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 4:31 AM, Federico Calboli > wrote: > [...] > Is it? this is news to me. I have a grand total of 2 packages up and I > never ever used R-devel, and never ever had a problem, had a report of a > problem or had a note fro

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] My first package

2014-01-20 Thread Matthew Denwood
On 20 Jan 2014, at 09:31, Federico Calboli wrote: > On 18 Jan 2014, at 14:31, Axel Urbiz wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> >> I'm planning to submit my first package to R, and although I read all the >> documentation, I'm not very clear on the following 2 items, from which I'd >> appreciate your guid

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] My first package

2014-01-20 Thread Federico Calboli
On 18 Jan 2014, at 14:31, Axel Urbiz wrote: > Hi All, > > > I'm planning to submit my first package to R, and although I read all the > documentation, I'm not very clear on the following 2 items, from which I'd > appreciate your guidance: > > > 1)I understand it is suggested to use the R dev

[R-SIG-Mac] My first package

2014-01-20 Thread Axel Urbiz
Hi All, I'm planning to submit my first package to R, and although I read all the documentation, I'm not very clear on the following 2 items, from which I'd appreciate your guidance: 1)I understand it is suggested to use the R dev version to build the package. Which one specifically should I us