> On 3 Apr 2020, at 13:25, Simon Urbanek wrote:
>
> Rainer,
>
>
>> On 3/04/2020, at 10:01 PM, Rainer M Krug wrote:
>>
>> Thanks a lot for your detailed response - it is very much appreciated.
>>
>>> On 2 Apr 2020, at 22:30, Simon Urbanek wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
On 2/04/2020, at 9:15 P
Rainer,
> On 3/04/2020, at 10:01 PM, Rainer M Krug wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot for your detailed response - it is very much appreciated.
>
>> On 2 Apr 2020, at 22:30, Simon Urbanek wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 2/04/2020, at 9:15 PM, Patrick Schratz wrote:
>>>
>>> AFAIK most people on that list wou
Thanks a lot for your detailed response - it is very much appreciated.
> On 2 Apr 2020, at 22:30, Simon Urbanek wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 2/04/2020, at 9:15 PM, Patrick Schratz wrote:
>>
>> AFAIK most people on that list would vote hard against installing R via
>> homebrew for several reasons - ma
> On 2/04/2020, at 9:15 PM, Patrick Schratz wrote:
>
> AFAIK most people on that list would vote hard against installing R via
> homebrew for several reasons - maybe there should be a section about this on
> the R dev / CRAN page to address this topic, @Simon? Otherwise this will come
> up
Rainer,
I am definitively interested.
But, as a disclaimer, I am an elderly Gynecologist only dabbling in R
and a little in Perl :-)-O.
el
On 02/04/2020 12:43, Rainer M Krug wrote:
>
>
>> On 2 Apr 2020, at 12:17, Duncan Murdoch
>> wrote:
>>
>> On 02/04/2020 5:58 a.m., Dr Eberhard W Lisse wr
Argument for homebrew:
brew upgrade
which will figure out what needs to be upgraded so I don't have
manually keep track of it.
BTW, it usually pulls the binary, and these have worked without any
issues for many years, the last time something went wrong on the
Download and it pulled t
> On 2 Apr 2020, at 12:56, Hervé Pagès wrote:
>
> Just for a minute let's ignore the fact that installing R via Homebrew is not
> considered a good option by the competent authorities (which sounds like a
> good enough reason to stay away from it). I'm still wondering: what's the
> benefit
Just for a minute let's ignore the fact that installing R via Homebrew
is not considered a good option by the competent authorities (which
sounds like a good enough reason to stay away from it). I'm still
wondering: what's the benefit vs installing the official CRAN binary?
Just curious.
Than
> On 2 Apr 2020, at 12:17, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> On 02/04/2020 5:58 a.m., Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
>> New thread :-)-O
>> I am wondering if I should not try to figure out how automate this.
>> Is there a way of (only) listing all user installed (additional)
>> packages, ie not the ones t
On 02/04/2020 5:58 a.m., Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
New thread :-)-O
I am wondering if I should not try to figure out how automate this.
Is there a way of (only) listing all user installed (additional)
packages, ie not the ones that come with R?
Look at the "Priority" column in installed.pack
New thread :-)-O
I am wondering if I should not try to figure out how automate this.
Is there a way of (only) listing all user installed (additional)
packages, ie not the ones that come with R?
I could then construct the below file automagically, and if I was
really bothered and bored find out
> On Oct 18, 2017, at 12:09 AM, Rainer Krug wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 17 Oct 2017, at 17:18, David Winsemius wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 17, 2017, at 7:56 AM, David Winsemius wrote:
>>>
On Oct 17, 2017, at 1:43 AM, Rainer Krug wrote:
Hi
One question about home-brew
> On 17 Oct 2017, at 17:18, David Winsemius wrote:
>
>>
>> On Oct 17, 2017, at 7:56 AM, David Winsemius wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 17, 2017, at 1:43 AM, Rainer Krug wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> One question about home-brew installation:
>>>
>>> After upgrading to High Sierra (and update to R
> On Oct 17, 2017, at 7:56 AM, David Winsemius wrote:
>
>>
>> On Oct 17, 2017, at 1:43 AM, Rainer Krug wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> One question about home-brew installation:
>>
>> After upgrading to High Sierra (and update to R 3.4.2), I don’t get tcl-tk
>> support in R.
>>
>> I get the followi
> On Oct 17, 2017, at 1:43 AM, Rainer Krug wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> One question about home-brew installation:
>
> After upgrading to High Sierra (and update to R 3.4.2), I don’t get tcl-tk
> support in R.
>
> I get the following error:
>
> > library(tcltk)
> Error: package or namespac
Hi
One question about home-brew installation:
After upgrading to High Sierra (and update to R 3.4.2), I don’t get tcl-tk
support in R.
I get the following error:
> library(tcltk)
Error: package or namespace load failed for ‘tcltk’:
.onLoad failed in loadNamespace() for
Hi,
I think
brew link --force gettext
is also a viable workaround ... when not being afraid of the wolves
(This pushes the keg only homebrew provided gettext version closer to
the conflicts arena, but for me enabled package installation in R again)
Usually-ignoring-fine-print-ly-yours
Stefan
Hi list,
This is probably the wrong place to post this, but I've hit an issue with the
homebrewed version of R. See:
https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-science/pull/676
It looks like the --with-libintl-prefix configure option is not adding the
proper include directory when installing packages.
Am 01.11.12 17:57, schrieb Frazier, Tyler James:
... is there a homebrew for r? maybe its just "brew install r"
...
what about "brew info r" before asking the list?
and then, yes "brew install r"
All the best,
Stefan.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Kryptografische Unterschrift
__
Hi, is there a homebrew for r? maybe its just "brew install r" -- thanks, Ty
-
Tyler Frazier
Department of Transportation Planning and Telematics
Technical University Berlin
http://www.vsp.tu-berlin.de/
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
___
20 matches
Mail list logo
