Re: [R-SIG-Mac] Rglpk package

2013-08-19 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On 19/08/2013 05:02, Simon Urbanek wrote: On Aug 18, 2013, at 6:50 PM, Michael Weylandt wrote: On Aug 18, 2013, at 15:47, David Winsemius dwinsem...@comcast.net wrote: On Aug 18, 2013, at 11:45 AM, Horst R. Wolf wrote: Is there any reason why the OS X binary is still not available?

[R-SIG-Mac] Rglpk package

2013-08-18 Thread Horst R. Wolf
Is there any reason why the OS X binary is still not available? Horst R. Wolfe mail horstrw...@msn.com To appreciate the good, we must suffer some things thatare bad. This is true of people, places and, er, cars. [[alternative HTML version

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] Rglpk package

2013-08-18 Thread David Winsemius
On Aug 18, 2013, at 11:45 AM, Horst R. Wolf wrote: Is there any reason why the OS X binary is still not available? Perhaps you should offer your basis for thinking, incorrectly, that it is not available. -- David Winsemius Alameda, CA, USA ___

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] Rglpk package

2013-08-18 Thread Michael Weylandt
On Aug 18, 2013, at 15:47, David Winsemius dwinsem...@comcast.net wrote: On Aug 18, 2013, at 11:45 AM, Horst R. Wolf wrote: Is there any reason why the OS X binary is still not available? Perhaps you should offer your basis for thinking, incorrectly, that it is not available. Seems

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] Rglpk package

2013-08-18 Thread Simon Urbanek
On Aug 18, 2013, at 6:50 PM, Michael Weylandt wrote: On Aug 18, 2013, at 15:47, David Winsemius dwinsem...@comcast.net wrote: On Aug 18, 2013, at 11:45 AM, Horst R. Wolf wrote: Is there any reason why the OS X binary is still not available? Perhaps you should offer your basis for