Original Message-
From: Steve Lianoglou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 11/6/2008 2:58 PM
To: Steven McKinney
Cc: R-SIG-Mac@stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: Re: [R-SIG-Mac] 64 bit - Installing packages from source
"> You don't actually need to install bioconductor packages from
sour
z.ch
Subject: Re: [R-SIG-Mac] 64 bit - Installing packages from source
"> You don't actually need to install bioconductor packages from
source "
Can Simon Urbanek weigh in on this?
I've been keeping an eye on R-SIG-Mac and have been seeing
repeated references in the last fe
MAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 11/6/2008 2:58 PM
To: Steven McKinney
Cc: R-SIG-Mac@stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: Re: [R-SIG-Mac] 64 bit - Installing packages from source
"> You don't actually need to install bioconductor packages from
source "
Can Simon Urbanek weigh in on this?
I&#
for Mac OS X Leopard for arch ppc64.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Lianoglou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 11/6/2008 2:58 PM
To: Steven McKinney
Cc: R-SIG-Mac@stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: Re: [R-SIG-Mac] 64 bit - Installing packages from source
> "> You don't
"> You don't actually need to install bioconductor packages from
source "
Can Simon Urbanek weigh in on this?
I've been keeping an eye on R-SIG-Mac and have been seeing
repeated references in the last few weeks about
installing from source for 64-bit R.
...
For some tangential weight, see t
Note that R 2.8.0 and Bioconductor 2.3 postdate the messages you quote.
On Thu, 6 Nov 2008, Steven McKinney wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Steve Lianoglou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 11/6/2008 1:29 PM
To: Steven McKinney
Cc: R-SIG-Mac@stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: Re: [R-SIG-Mac
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Lianoglou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thu 11/6/2008 1:29 PM
> To: Steven McKinney
> Cc: R-SIG-Mac@stat.math.ethz.ch
> Subject: Re: [R-SIG-Mac] 64 bit R tcltk library problem: Symbol not found:
> _Tk_Init
>
> Hi,
>
...
>
> In trying to be a litt
