That's what I meant with (b), but it was perhaps too hastily
written...
On 9/18/11 5:41 PM, Leandro Jones wrote:
Nick´s rules won´t allways work in a Parsimony context. For example, a
position like this one:
1 A
2 A
3 T
4 C
would be "informative" under rules (a) and (b), but it is in reality
un
Hi all,
It can be done with phyloch but I forgot the name of the function.
HTH
Emmanuel
-Original Message-
From: Leandro Jones
Sender: r-sig-phylo-boun...@r-project.org
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 07:35:32
To:
Subject: [R-sig-phylo] Show Informative Sites?
Nick´s rules won´t allways work
Nick´s rules won´t allways work in a Parsimony context. For example, a
position like this one:
1 A
2 A
3 T
4 C
would be "informative" under rules (a) and (b), but it is in reality
uninformative, as any of the possible trees have a length of 2. Thus,
this character tells us nothing about _phylogeny_