t;belind...@gmx.de<mailto:belind...@gmx.de>>, "mailman,
r-sig-phylo" <r-sig-phylo@r-project.org<mailto:r-sig-phylo@r-project.org>>
Subject: Re: [R-sig-phylo] estimating the evolutionary rate of a continous
trait
Hi, Belinda.
One thing to watch is over-intepretation:
>
> Reply-To: "omeara.br...@gmail.com<mailto:omeara.br...@gmail.com>" <
> omeara.br...@gmail.com<mailto:omeara.br...@gmail.com>>
> Date: Friday, April 15, 2016 at 11:00 AM
> To: Belinda Kahnt <belind...@gmx.de<mailto:belind...@gmx.de>>, "
r...@gmail.com<mailto:omeara.br...@gmail.com>>
Date: Friday, April 15, 2016 at 11:00 AM
To: Belinda Kahnt <belind...@gmx.de<mailto:belind...@gmx.de>>, "mailman,
r-sig-phylo" <r-sig-phylo@r-project.org<mailto:r-sig-phylo@r-project.org>>
Subject: Re: [R-sig
Hi, Belinda.
One thing to watch is over-intepretation: BM is consistent with drift, OU
is consistent with selection, but various kinds of selection can also lead
to BM. [1]. A lot of the people involved in these methods (including me)
are guilty of sloppiness in language in this area, leading to
Dear all,
I am a newbie to this mailing list and phylogenetic analyses in R and hope you can comment on a question I have. I would like to estimate the rate of evolution of a continous trait and check if the trait evolves faster along some branches of the topology. I already checked with Pagels
