Hello members,
I'm creating relative values os semicircular canal size by fitting a PGLS
and extracting residuals (using phyl.resid). I've heard that R-squared
isn't meaningful in gls models. What I'm trying to do is to know is which
of the two independent variables is best and on a lm () model I
Hi Emmanuel,
Thanks for your answer. So that means I can still use that Lambda estimated
value, I suppose. In the case of Lambda1, it then means that species are
more similar than expected, right?
Best regards,
Sérgio.
2015-07-17 15:57 GMT+01:00 Emmanuel Paradis emmanuel.para...@ird.fr:
Hi
It's not that r squared isn't meaningful for generalized least squares but
rather that it cannot be compared directly with values from OLS models.
Cheers,
Ted
From: R-sig-phylo [r-sig-phylo-boun...@r-project.org] on behalf of Sergio
Ferreira Cardoso [sff.card...@campus.fct.unl.pt]
Sent:
Dear Dr. Garland,
Then there is no problem because I just need to compare between
phylogenetic models.
Thank you.
Best regards,
Sérgio.
2015-07-20 14:48 GMT+01:00 Theodore Garland Jr theodore.garl...@ucr.edu:
It's not that r squared isn't meaningful for generalized least squares but
rather
