[R-sig-phylo] Problem with the use of list of trees in aov.phylo () command.

2015-03-16 Thread Carlos H. Biagolini Junior
Hello, I would like to ask for an advice: I am using the function aov.phylo () in Geiger package (Garland, 1993), to run a phylogenetic ANOVA. I have had collected data in literature, and I am using trees from the birdtree.org web site (for bird phylogenies). My difficulty is: How can I perform

Re: [R-sig-phylo] Problem with the use of list of trees in aov.phylo () command.

2015-03-17 Thread Carlos H. Biagolini Junior
y)"[1]) > > All the best, Liam > > Liam J. Revell, Assistant Professor of Biology > University of Massachusetts Boston > web: http://faculty.umb.edu/liam.revell/ > email: liam.rev...@umb.edu > blog: http://blog.phytools.org > > On 3/16/2015 5:29 PM, Carlos H. Biagolini Juni

[R-sig-phylo] Phylogenetic ANOVA or PGLS for categorical data?

2015-05-28 Thread Carlos H. Biagolini Junior
Hello everyone, I am comparing a categorical data vs. a continues data, but the continues data is a frequency of an observed parameter. I'm considering using phylogenetic ANOVA (Garland 1993) or PGLS for categorical data. But, I am not sure with one is more appropriate to my data. I would like

Re: [R-sig-phylo] A question about phylogenetic signal significance with 1000 trees

2016-12-08 Thread Carlos H. Biagolini Junior
Hi Bruno, I had a similar problem. In my case, I had a set of 1000 trees (from birdtree.org), and I dealt with it, by: # Load packages library(adephylo) library(phytools) library(geiger) # Load data data.base<- read.table(file = "data.base.txt", header = TRUE, row.names = 1); # Load trees n.tre