Re: [racket-dev] Re: support for arm64 / aarch64

At Fri, 18 Dec 2015 13:21:29 -0400, David Bremner wrote: > Just to update, the default (-j4) build is still failing on ppc64el / > aarm64 with racket 6.3 > > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=racket=ppc64el=6.3-2 > amp=1450447398 > > I can try a single threaded build

Re: [racket-dev] Re: support for arm64 / aarch64

At Fri, 18 Dec 2015 19:04:32 -0400, David Bremner wrote: > Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado writes: > > > On Friday 18 December 2015 13:42:32 Matthew Flatt wrote: > >>At Fri, 18 Dec 2015 13:21:29 -0400, David Bremner wrote: > >>> > >>> I can try a single threaded build later,

[racket-dev] report from December leadership meeting

Every few months, the principals of the Racket world meet for a day to discuss the state and near (and, occasionally, distant) future of the Racket world. We met on the weekend of December 5 in Dunstable, MA, and here is the list of major points we discussed. 1. Contributions and Software Freedom

Re: [racket-dev] report from December leadership meeting

> A related issue is that examples in the documentation sometimes > fail in a way that indicates a bug. By having that failure be a > documentation-build failure, instead of rendered as an error > message in the documentation, we can avoid some errors in a > release. Matthew will add a

[racket-dev] Re: support for arm64 / aarch64

On 19/12/15 00:04, David Bremner wrote: Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado writes: On Friday 18 December 2015 13:42:32 Matthew Flatt wrote: At Fri, 18 Dec 2015 13:21:29 -0400, David Bremner wrote: I can try a single threaded build later, but I wondered if the huge number of

Re: [racket-dev] Re: support for arm64 / aarch64

Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado writes: > On Friday 18 December 2015 13:42:32 Matthew Flatt wrote: >>At Fri, 18 Dec 2015 13:21:29 -0400, David Bremner wrote: >>> >>> I can try a single threaded build later, but I wondered if the huge >>> number of warnings from the JIT code

Re: [racket-dev] Re: support for arm64 / aarch64

Matthew Flatt writes: > At Fri, 18 Dec 2015 13:21:29 -0400, David Bremner wrote: >> Just to update, the default (-j4) build is still failing on ppc64el / >> aarm64 with racket 6.3 >> >> >> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=racket=ppc64el=6.3-2 >>