Great, thanks!
Vincent
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 12:41:34 -0500,
Ryan Culpepper wrote:
>
> On 07/22/2016 01:17 PM, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
> > Ok, just a few left.
> >
> >> ryanc:
> >> - upcoming syntax/parse backwards incompatibility
> >
> > I've re-read the discussion, and now I'm confused. Was
On 07/22/2016 01:17 PM, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
Ok, just a few left.
ryanc:
- upcoming syntax/parse backwards incompatibility
I've re-read the discussion, and now I'm confused. Was the resolution a
new set of changes that accomplishes what the older, backwards-
incompatible changes would
Ok, just a few left.
> ryanc:
> - upcoming syntax/parse backwards incompatibility
I've re-read the discussion, and now I'm confused. Was the resolution a
new set of changes that accomplishes what the older, backwards-
incompatible changes would have achieved, but which preserves backwards
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 7:35 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> Can we say in a single line how to get the warnings to show up?
>
> Robby
>
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Vincent
Ok, so how about:
Typed Racket produces up to 4x smaller compiled files compared with
Racket 6.5, reducing the size of the Racket distribution by 50M.
Vincent
On Thu, 21 Jul 2016 19:08:03 -0500,
Alex Harsanyi wrote:
>
> Hi Asumu,
>
> I just installed 6.6.0.2 and for a small TR module