Re: [racket-dev] Browser support on unix

2016-11-15 Thread Vincent St-Amour
Eli, I looks like you have a very specific resolution in mind, which is not coming across in email. Could you submit a patch with what you have in mind? That would make it clearer to everyone. Vincent On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 08:07:24 -0600, Eli Barzilay wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 4:31 P

Re: [racket-dev] Browser support on unix

2016-11-15 Thread 'Reuben Thomas' via Racket Developers
On November 15, 2016 2:07:24 PM GMT, Eli Barzilay wrote: >On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Reuben Thomas wrote: >> On 13 November 2016 at 03:54, Eli Barzilay wrote: >>> >>> xdg-open still has an advantage of being installed more (eg, on >>> Fedora I don't see either of the other two things insta

Re: [racket-dev] Browser support on unix

2016-11-15 Thread Eli Barzilay
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Reuben Thomas wrote: > On 13 November 2016 at 03:54, Eli Barzilay wrote: >> >> xdg-open still has an advantage of being installed more (eg, on >> Fedora I don't see either of the other two things installed by >> default), and at least trying to be a standard... >

Re: [racket-dev] Browser support on unix

2016-11-14 Thread 'Reuben Thomas' via Racket Developers
On 13 November 2016 at 03:54, Eli Barzilay wrote: > On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 6:24 PM, 'Reuben Thomas' via Racket Developers > wrote: > > > > That's a good idea, but I don't think there is much point. xdg-open is > > meant mainly to open files. For Racket, we know we are trying to run a > > browser

Re: [racket-dev] Browser support on unix

2016-11-12 Thread Eli Barzilay
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 6:24 PM, 'Reuben Thomas' via Racket Developers wrote: > > That's a good idea, but I don't think there is much point. xdg-open is > meant mainly to open files. For Racket, we know we are trying to run a > browser. There are other methods to do this, e.g. sensible-browser > a

Re: [racket-dev] Browser support on unix

2016-11-10 Thread Vincent St-Amour
I'd put `chromium-browser` next to `google-chrome` in the list. Other than that, looks good to me. I'm happy to make the above change when committing, if that works for you. Vincent On Tue, 08 Nov 2016 19:01:19 -0600, Racket Dev wrote: > > On 8 November 2016 at 17:16, Reuben Thomas wrote: >

Re: [racket-dev] Browser support on unix

2016-11-09 Thread 'Reuben Thomas' via Racket Developers
On 9 November 2016 at 23:22, Eli Barzilay wrote: > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 8:01 PM, 'Reuben Thomas' via Racket Developers > wrote: > >> > >> Thanks, I'll take that back to the xdg-utils list, and prepare a > >> simple PR to add chromium-browser. > > > > Attached, a patch to improve the browser li

Re: [racket-dev] Browser support on unix

2016-11-09 Thread Eli Barzilay
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 8:01 PM, 'Reuben Thomas' via Racket Developers wrote: >> >> Thanks, I'll take that back to the xdg-utils list, and prepare a >> simple PR to add chromium-browser. > > Attached, a patch to improve the browser list. See the commit log for > details. Openning a URL on windows

Re: [racket-dev] Browser support on unix

2016-11-09 Thread Vincent St-Amour
Perfect. I'll commit your changes. Thanks a lot for looking into this! Vincent On Wed, 09 Nov 2016 11:10:55 -0600, Reuben Thomas wrote: > > On 9 November 2016 at 17:10, Vincent St-Amour > wrote: > > I'd put `chromium-browser` next to `google-chrome` in the list. > > > ​Sounds sens

Re: [racket-dev] Browser support on unix

2016-11-09 Thread 'Reuben Thomas' via Racket Developers
On 9 November 2016 at 17:10, Vincent St-Amour < stamo...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: > I'd put `chromium-browser` next to `google-chrome` in the list. > ​Sounds sensible!​ Other than that, looks good to me. I'm happy to make the above change > when committing, if that works for you. > ​That's

Re: [racket-dev] Browser support on unix

2016-11-08 Thread 'Reuben Thomas' via Racket Developers
On 8 November 2016 at 17:16, Reuben Thomas wrote: > On 8 November 2016 at 17:11, Ryan Culpepper wrote: > >> On 11/07/2016 03:25 PM, 'Reuben Thomas' via Racket Developers wrote: >> >>> A couple of questions: >>> >>> 1. Why is xdg-open commented out in all-unix-browsers? (These days it >>> should

Re: [racket-dev] Browser support on unix

2016-11-08 Thread 'Reuben Thomas' via Racket Developers
On 8 November 2016 at 17:11, Ryan Culpepper wrote: > On 11/07/2016 03:25 PM, 'Reuben Thomas' via Racket Developers wrote: > >> A couple of questions: >> >> 1. Why is xdg-open commented out in all-unix-browsers? (These days it >> should be possible to put this first, and also to remove gnome-open,

Re: [racket-dev] Browser support on unix

2016-11-08 Thread Ryan Culpepper
On 11/07/2016 03:25 PM, 'Reuben Thomas' via Racket Developers wrote: A couple of questions: 1. Why is xdg-open commented out in all-unix-browsers? (These days it should be possible to put this first, and also to remove gnome-open, long-obsolete.) In particular, xdg-open does support file: URLs.

[racket-dev] Browser support on unix

2016-11-07 Thread 'Reuben Thomas' via Racket Developers
A couple of questions: 1. Why is xdg-open commented out in all-unix-browsers? (These days it should be possible to put this first, and also to remove gnome-open, long-obsolete.) In particular, xdg-open does support file: URLs. 2. chromium-browser should be added to the list. If some developer